EIN: 396005088
UEI: NLMRNCH8JPC6
Audited by: Lauterbach & Amen, LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 14, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (16 days from today).
What is a management decision? →The District did not have appropriate M-5's on file for several students. Criteria: Districts are required to maintain a signed and dated M-5 form (Consent to Bill Wisconsin Medicaid) for each student who has services billed through Medicaid. Cause: District staff did not maintain proper documentation to bill Medicaid for students. Effect: Failing to obtain a signed and dated M-5 form could affect the reimbursements received by the District under the SBS Medicaid program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The District did not have appropriate M-5's on file for several students. Criteria: Districts are required to maintain a signed and dated M-5 form (Consent to Bill Wisconsin Medicaid) for each student who has services billed through Medicaid. Cause: District staff did not maintain proper documentation to bill Medicaid for students. Effect: Failing to obtain a signed and dated M-5 form could affect the reimbursements received by the District under the SBS Medicaid program.
The District acknowledges its lack of proper consent for billing and will continue to review its procedures for obtaining and maintaining consent forms to ensure that the District has appropriate permission to submit services for reimbursement through the SBS Medicaid System.
FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2024 — management decision was due June 23, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2024 — management decision was due November 6, 2024.
The District submitted reimbursements for one student who did not have a signed M-5 on file. Effect: The District did not comply with the requirements needed to submit claims. Cause: The District did not have procedures in place for ensuring that all M-5’s have been obtained prior to claiming student costs. Questioned Costs: $1,327 Recommendation: We recommend that management and those charged with governance ensure the policies and procedures are in place to maintain proper documentation for claiming student costs. Corrective Action Plan: The district has changed internal verifications and has engaged a new Medicare processing provider which will ensure future compliance with having all M5 forms on file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The School Based Service provider is required to have a signed and dated consent to bill (M-5) from the parent or guardian of a student with an IEP before claims can be submitted. Condition: The District submitted reimbursements for one student who did not have a signed M-5 on file. Effect: The District did not comply with the requirements needed to submit claims. Cause: The District did not have procedures in place for ensuring that all M-5’s have been obtained prior to claiming student costs. Questioned Costs: $1,327 Recommendation: We recommend that management and those charged with governance ensure the policies and procedures are in place to maintain proper documentation for claiming student costs. Corrective Action Plan: The district has changed internal verifications and has engaged a new Medicare processing provider which will ensure future compliance with having all M5 forms on file.
The district has changed internal verifications and has engaged a new Medicare processing provider which will ensure future compliance with having all M5 forms on file.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2023 — management decision was due July 8, 2023.
The District had wages coded to IDEA for employees that had multiple cost objectives. The District did not maintain time and effort documentation for positions that have multiple cost objectives under IDEA. Effect: The District could not substantiate the amount of wages claimed for the purposes of receiving IDEA funding. Cause: The District did not have procedures in place for documenting time and effort for employees sharing multiple cost objectives for purposes of claiming IDEA funds. Questioned Costs: $62,671 Recommendation: We recommend that management and those charged with governance ensure the policies and procedures are in place for accurate reporting for federal costs that share multiple cost objectives. Corrective Action Plan: The District has put in place Federal Funding procedures. The positions in question for the 2021/2022 audit have been removed from the grant and replaced with salaries not requiring time and effort. We are aware of the time and effort requirements and will require any salaries added back into the grant to track their time.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulates in ?200.430(i) that all salaries charged to a Federal grant must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. For a position with multiple cost objectives under a grant program, the recipient must have supporting documentation that the time charged to the grant is the amount of actual time the position worked on the grant?s objectives. Condition: The District had wages coded to IDEA for employees that had multiple cost objectives. The District did not maintain time and effort documentation for positions that have multiple cost objectives under IDEA. Effect: The District could not substantiate the amount of wages claimed for the purposes of receiving IDEA funding. Cause: The District did not have procedures in place for documenting time and effort for employees sharing multiple cost objectives for purposes of claiming IDEA funds. Questioned Costs: $62,671 Recommendation: We recommend that management and those charged with governance ensure the policies and procedures are in place for accurate reporting for federal costs that share multiple cost objectives. Corrective Action Plan: The District has put in place Federal Funding procedures. The positions in question for the 2021/2022 audit have been removed from the grant and replaced with salaries not requiring time and effort. We are aware of the time and effort requirements and will require any salaries added back into the grant to track their time.
Corrective Action Plan: The District has put in place Federal Funding procedures. The positions in question for the 2021/2022 audit have been removed from the grant and replaced with salaries not requiring time and effort. We are aware of the time and effort requirements and will require any salaries added back into the grant to track their time.
FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2022 — management decision was due July 4, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2020 — management decision was due June 14, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2018 — management decision was due June 10, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2018 — management decision was due September 11, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2017 — management decision was due September 11, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.