← Back to home

VIROQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 396004944

UEI: JPC1ZMXDHR14

Audited by: Lauterbach & Amen, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

VIROQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,122,050 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (27 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,946,414 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2025 — management decision was due December 26, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$3,458,055 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2024 — management decision was due August 22, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,078,910 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 25, 2023 — management decision was due November 25, 2023.

2022-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

There was one Education Stabilization Fund construction project performed by a contractor. Grant expenditures for the project paid by the Education Stabilization Fund totaled $33,000. There was not a prevailing wage clause in the contract and certified payrolls were not received. Criteria: Wage rate requirements apply to the Education Stabilization Fund when laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors work on construction contracts more than $2,000. Laborers must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL). Nonfederal entities shall include in their contracts, subject to wage rate requirements, a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the District weekly payrolls and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Cause: The District was not aware that wage rate requirements applied to the construction project until after it was completed. Effect: A reimbursement request was made for expenditures that did not comply with wage rate requirements. Questioned Costs: $33,000 Auditor?s Recommendation: Establish controls to comply with wage rate requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund. Grantee Response: The District will comply with the wage rate requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-002 ? Education Stabilization Fund ? Prevailing wage rate requirements Condition: There was one Education Stabilization Fund construction project performed by a contractor. Grant expenditures for the project paid by the Education Stabilization Fund totaled $33,000. There was not a prevailing wage clause in the contract and certified payrolls were not received. Criteria: Wage rate requirements apply to the Education Stabilization Fund when laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors work on construction contracts more than $2,000. Laborers must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL). Nonfederal entities shall include in their contracts, subject to wage rate requirements, a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the District weekly payrolls and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Cause: The District was not aware that wage rate requirements applied to the construction project until after it was completed. Effect: A reimbursement request was made for expenditures that did not comply with wage rate requirements. Questioned Costs: $33,000 Auditor?s Recommendation: Establish controls to comply with wage rate requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund. Grantee Response: The District will comply with the wage rate requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-002 ? Education Stabilization Fund ? Prevailing wage rate requirements Condition: There was one Education Stabilization Fund construction project performed by a contractor. Grant expenditures for the project paid by the Education Stabilization Fund totaled $33,000. There was not a prevailing wage clause in the contract and certified payrolls were not received. Criteria: Wage rate requirements apply to the Education Stabilization Fund when laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors work on construction contracts more than $2,000. Laborers must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL). Nonfederal entities shall include in their contracts, subject to wage rate requirements, a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the District weekly payrolls and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Cause: The District was not aware that wage rate requirements applied to the construction project until after it was completed. Effect: A reimbursement request was made for expenditures that did not comply with wage rate requirements. Questioned Costs: $33,000 Auditor?s Recommendation: Establish controls to comply with wage rate requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund. Grantee Response: The District will comply with the wage rate requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund going forward. Contact Person: Michael Brendel Anticipated Completion: June 30, 2023

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,922,676 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 27, 2022 — management decision was due October 27, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$1,533,716 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2021 — management decision was due August 8, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$1,383,853 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
OTHER MATTERS

Condition & Criteria: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services requires districts to obtain and maintain a Wisconsin Department of Public Instructions Form M-5, ?Consent to Bill Wisconsin Medicaid? from the parent or guardian of a student with an IEP before claims can be submitted to Medicaid. The consent to bill is a one-time consent but is not transferrable to a different district. Cause: The District was aware of the requirement, but failed to locate one consent to bill for a student within a sample of students picked for testing. Effect: Services billed to Medicaid are not allowed if a consent to bill is not on file. The amount of questioned costs was below the reportable threshold. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that the District put controls into effect to assure all eligible students with an IEP have a consent to bill on file. Grantee Response: The District is aware of the requirement and felt they had obtained the proper documentation but were not able to locate it. The District will make a better effort to ensure that all consent to bill forms are filed appropriately.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition & Criteria: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services requires districts to obtain and maintain a Wisconsin Department of Public Instructions Form M-5, ?Consent to Bill Wisconsin Medicaid? from the parent or guardian of a student with an IEP before claims can be submitted to Medicaid. The consent to bill is a one-time consent but is not transferrable to a different district. Cause: The District was aware of the requirement, but failed to locate one consent to bill for a student within a sample of students picked for testing. Effect: Services billed to Medicaid are not allowed if a consent to bill is not on file. The amount of questioned costs was below the reportable threshold. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that the District put controls into effect to assure all eligible students with an IEP have a consent to bill on file. Grantee Response: The District is aware of the requirement and felt they had obtained the proper documentation but were not able to locate it. The District will make a better effort to ensure that all consent to bill forms are filed appropriately.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002 Medicaid Condition & Criteria: The Wisconsin Department of Health Services requires districts to obtain and maintain a Wisconsin Department of Public Instructions Form M-5, ?Consent to Bill Wisconsin Medicaid? from the parent or guardian of a student with an IEP before claims can be submitted to Medicaid. The consent to bill is a one-time consent but is not transferrable to a different district. Cause: The District was aware of the requirement, but failed to locate one consent to bill for a student within a sample of students picked for testing. Effect: Services billed to Medicaid are not allowed if a consent to bill is not on file. The amount of questioned costs was below the reportable threshold. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that the District put controls into effect to assure all eligible students with an IEP have a consent to bill on file. Grantee Response: The District is aware of the requirement and felt they had obtained the proper documentation but were not able to locate it. The District will make a better effort to ensure that all consent to bill forms are filed appropriately. Contact Person: Michael Brendel Anticipated Completion: June 30, 2020

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,273,855 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2019 — management decision was due September 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,461,737 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2017 — management decision was due June 14, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,543,685 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2017 — management decision was due August 15, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.