EIN: 396001570
UEI: FN1KLMTMVM29
Audited by: JOHNSON BLOCK & COMPANY, INC.
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2024 (747 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District’s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District’s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
Condition: Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District's office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: ► The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system.Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportonities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an ► The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to detennine eligibility.Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the nonnal course of their responsibilitie as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease. opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportonities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
2022-001
FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2022 — management decision was due June 18, 2023.
Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District?s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding #2022-001 - Segregation of Duties (Prior Year Finding #2021-001) Condition: Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District?s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
Finding #2022-001 - Segregation of Duties (Prior Year Finding #2021-001) Condition: Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District?s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District. Finding #2022-001 - Segregation of Contact Person: Heather Droessler Anticipated Completion: Not applicable
2021-001
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2022 — management decision was due July 30, 2022.
Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District?s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding #2021-001 - Segregation of Duties (Prior Year Finding #2020-001) Condition: Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District?s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District.
Finding #2021-001 - Segregation of Duties (Prior Year Finding #2020-001) Condition: Proper segregation of duties is an important aspect of any control system. Management is responsible for the design, installation and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control. The limited size of the District?s office staff prevents the ideal segregation of functions. The following duties lack adequate segregation of duties: The District uses e-signatures to approve purchase orders. Two individuals have access to the e-signatures and have the ability to create new vendors, enter invoices, print checks, record journal entries and record activity on the general ledger. Both individuals also have access to the payroll system. The person reviewing free and reduced food service eligibility can also enter information into the system to determine eligibility. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Cause: Limited number of personnel. Criteria: Segregation of duties is an aspect of internal control intended to prevent or decrease opportunities of intentional and unintentional errors and fraud. Duties and responsibilities are properly segregated if no single individual either has control over all phases of a transaction or has the ability to both make and conceal an error, whether such error is intentional or unintentional. Recommendation: The Board of Education and the Superintendent should continue to monitor the transactions and the financial records of the District. We also encourage the District to continue to identify cost effective opportunities to improve the design of the internal control structure. Response: We agree with this finding but do not believe it is cost effective to increase the office staff in an attempt to bring about a more effective segregation of duties. The Superintendent approves purchase orders and the Board of Education approves monthly accounts payable checks, and one of the school secretaries or the board treasurer reviews the bank reconciliations. The Board of Education and Superintendent will continue to monitor transactions of the District. Contact Person: Heather Droessler Anticipated Completion: Not Applicable
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
