EIN: 391380437
UEI: X171WD8KHW49
Audited by: SVA Certified Public Accountants, S.C.
Oversight agency: 16 [Department of Justice]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 7, 2027 (152 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on October 2, 2025 — management decision was due April 2, 2026.
Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-001. Criteria: Internal controls over preparation and review of the financial statements should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that a misstatement in the financial statements would be prevented or detected. Statement of condition: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare monthly financial statements for eight months of the year. Thus, monthly financial statements were not reviewed by management or those charged with governance. Organization personnel do have the necessary expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cause: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements for eight months of the year. Effect: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Questioned costs: There were no questioned costs. Views of responsible officials: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements for eight months of the year. The organization accepts responsibility for the audited financial statements. Context: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Recommendation: It is recommended that monthly financial statements be prepared and reviewed by management and those charged with governance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-001. Criteria: Internal controls over preparation and review of the financial statements should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that a misstatement in the financial statements would be prevented or detected. Statement of condition: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare monthly financial statements for eight months of the year. Thus, monthly financial statements were not reviewed by management or those charged with governance. Organization personnel do have the necessary expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cause: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements for eight months of the year. Effect: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Questioned costs: There were no questioned costs. Views of responsible officials: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements for eight months of the year. The organization accepts responsibility for the audited financial statements. Context: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Recommendation: It is recommended that monthly financial statements be prepared and reviewed by management and those charged with governance.
Comments on findings and recommendations The organization agrees with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation. Actions taken or planned The organization reinstated the practice of preparing monthly financial statements to be reviewed by management and those charged with governance. Completion date September 30, 2024
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on July 26, 2024 — management decision was due January 26, 2025.
Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Criteria: Internal controls over preparation and review of the financial statements should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that a misstatement in the financial statements would be prevented or detected. Statement of condition: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare monthly financial statements. Thus, monthly financial statements were not reviewed by management or those charged with governance. Organization personnel do have the necessary expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cause: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements. Effect: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Questioned costs: There were no questioned costs. Views of responsible officials: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements. The organization accepts responsibility for the audited financial statements. Context: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Recommendation: It is recommended that monthly financial statements be prepared and reviewed by management and those charged with governance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Criteria: Internal controls over preparation and review of the financial statements should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that a misstatement in the financial statements would be prevented or detected. Statement of condition: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare monthly financial statements. Thus, monthly financial statements were not reviewed by management or those charged with governance. Organization personnel do have the necessary expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cause: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements. Effect: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Questioned costs: There were no questioned costs. Views of responsible officials: Due to staffing and workload constraints, the organization did not prepare or review monthly financial statements. The organization accepts responsibility for the audited financial statements. Context: Since there was no preparation or review of monthly financial statements, the organization’s system of internal control may not prevent, detect, or correct misstatements in the financial statements. Recommendation: It is recommended that monthly financial statements be prepared and reviewed by management and those charged with governance.
Condition and Cause: Due to staff turnover in Finance and the level of workload there were difficulties creating financial statements on a timely basis. Status: The Coalition is implementing a process to prepare, review, and approve financial statements to ensure that financials are reviewed and approved by Management on a regular basis. Corrective Action: End Abuse will take the following corrective actions: (1) End Abuse will create a process that involves the creation, review, and approval of financial statements. (2) The Finance Director will create the financial statements; the Executive Director or the Associate Director will review and approve them. (3) The Finance Director is currently recruiting for a staff accountant to help ease the workload. (4) The Board of Directors will review financial statements and/or financial reports on a quarterly basis to ensure that proper procedures are followed. Expected Completion Date: September 30, 2024
FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2023 — management decision was due January 23, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2022 — management decision was due January 24, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 14, 2021 — management decision was due December 14, 2021.
The Coalition did not maintain evidence of review and approval of controls over the procurement process. The Coalition also did not maintain history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Context: A test of four contracts totaling $100,862 from a population of 37 contracts totaling $246,033 revealed that three contracts had a lack of evidence of review and approval over the procurement process and records to support the rationale of the procurement method, selection of contractor, and basis of contract price. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Effect: Lack of reviews may result in noncompliance. Disallowed costs charged to programs could occur and not be detected and corrected or contracts entered into may be disallowed. Cause: There was no monitoring system in place to detect the lack of documentation. Policies and procedures do not clearly document what procurement requirements should be reviewed for and how and where the review should be documented. Policies and procedures also do not clearly document who is responsible for maintaining records of procurement and where those records are to be retained. Recommendation: We recommend the review and approval of the procurement process to be documented on a procurement checklist or form. We recommend the procurement checklist or form be attached or filed with the supporting documentation of the history of the procurement. We also recommend policies and procedures over procurement to be updated to clearly document who is responsible for reviewing, what is to be reviewed, and how and where to document the review. The policies and procedures should also document who is responsible for maintaining records of procurement and where those records are to be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Coalition agrees with the finding and is in the process of implementing the recommendations to improve its systems to evaluate and monitor internal controls over procurement by June 2021.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2020-001 Information on the Federal Program: United States Department of Justice, Federal Assistance Listings Number 16.526, OVW Technical Assistance Initiative, Year ended December 31, 2020. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.303 requires establishing and maintaining internal controls that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with the Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) requires the maintenance of records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: The Coalition did not maintain evidence of review and approval of controls over the procurement process. The Coalition also did not maintain history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Context: A test of four contracts totaling $100,862 from a population of 37 contracts totaling $246,033 revealed that three contracts had a lack of evidence of review and approval over the procurement process and records to support the rationale of the procurement method, selection of contractor, and basis of contract price. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Effect: Lack of reviews may result in noncompliance. Disallowed costs charged to programs could occur and not be detected and corrected or contracts entered into may be disallowed. Cause: There was no monitoring system in place to detect the lack of documentation. Policies and procedures do not clearly document what procurement requirements should be reviewed for and how and where the review should be documented. Policies and procedures also do not clearly document who is responsible for maintaining records of procurement and where those records are to be retained. Recommendation: We recommend the review and approval of the procurement process to be documented on a procurement checklist or form. We recommend the procurement checklist or form be attached or filed with the supporting documentation of the history of the procurement. We also recommend policies and procedures over procurement to be updated to clearly document who is responsible for reviewing, what is to be reviewed, and how and where to document the review. The policies and procedures should also document who is responsible for maintaining records of procurement and where those records are to be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Coalition agrees with the finding and is in the process of implementing the recommendations to improve its systems to evaluate and monitor internal controls over procurement by June 2021.
Will obtain from the client.
FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2020 — management decision was due December 29, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on July 7, 2019 — management decision was due January 7, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2018 — management decision was due December 21, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2017 — management decision was due December 4, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
