Northcott Neighborhood House, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 390984402

UEI: WBYYRQMK3W93

Audited by: Ritz Holman LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Northcott Neighborhood House, Inc.9 audit years2 findings1 repeat
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,871,913 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2026 (158 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,877,210 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2024 — management decision was due March 27, 2025.

2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Costs reported on the grant cost reports do not match the costs reported in the financial system for salaries of certain staff, primarily for staff working in more than one program. From January – September 2023 no salaries were allocated in the financial system to the City of Milwaukee Hydrophonics program, however, costs were charged for salaries on grant cost reports. According to management, the program was active during this time, however, timesheets didn’t have an appropriate tracking of this program and so wages were not allocated in the financial system. Management believes the amounts charged on cost reports are accurate, however documentation of timesheets doesn’t provide enough information to test. In addition, the allocation spreadsheet used to enter the monthly payroll costs in the financial system had an error in one payroll tested and two time sheets were not provided to the auditor for testing. 4) Cause: The Organization was preparing a worksheet of costs based on timesheets and using this to enter into the accounting system. A separate allocation worksheet was used to prepare grant reports which also included an allocation of time and wages per employee. The allocations in the two systems were not always matching. 5) Effect: While management believes the amounts charged on cost reports are accurate, the general ledger required reclassification journal entries to increase salaries for the following grants to match cost reports as follows: Hydrophonics $14,424, Repro Arborist $4,429, COVID $10,052 and, UMOS $4,987. All programs had losses after the reclassification adjustments, and, therefore, no revenue received from the City of Milwaukee was unused by the programs. 6) Questioned costs: See consideration of losses by program noted in the Effect. 7) Prevalence or consequence: The process was in place throughout the year. 8) Repeated audit finding: This is not a repeat finding. 9) Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: It is recommended that the worksheet used to allocate salaries based on timesheets be used to also create grant cost reports. In addition, it is recommended that the timesheets be regularly reviewed and updated to include all programs, agency wide work, and fundraising to account for all possible activities. It is also recommended that the cost reports be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis. 10) Views of responsible officials at auditee: Timesheets will be updated to reflect all active programs and support functions. The worksheet that is used to compile employee hours will be used to allocate in the financial system and on the grant cost reports so that all systems align. Responsible Employee: Tony Kearney is responsible for determining that the system is updated by the accounting department. Corrective Action Implementation Date: September 2024.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

1) ALN 14.218 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants provided through the City of Milwaukee 2) Criteria: Reported costs on grants should match recorded costs in the financial accounting system. Payroll costs recorded in the general ledger and reported on grant cost reports should be based off the time sheets prepared by employees and reviewed by supervisors. 3) Condition: Costs reported on the grant cost reports do not match the costs reported in the financial system for salaries of certain staff, primarily for staff working in more than one program. From January – September 2023 no salaries were allocated in the financial system to the City of Milwaukee Hydrophonics program, however, costs were charged for salaries on grant cost reports. According to management, the program was active during this time, however, timesheets didn’t have an appropriate tracking of this program and so wages were not allocated in the financial system. Management believes the amounts charged on cost reports are accurate, however documentation of timesheets doesn’t provide enough information to test. In addition, the allocation spreadsheet used to enter the monthly payroll costs in the financial system had an error in one payroll tested and two time sheets were not provided to the auditor for testing. 4) Cause: The Organization was preparing a worksheet of costs based on timesheets and using this to enter into the accounting system. A separate allocation worksheet was used to prepare grant reports which also included an allocation of time and wages per employee. The allocations in the two systems were not always matching. 5) Effect: While management believes the amounts charged on cost reports are accurate, the general ledger required reclassification journal entries to increase salaries for the following grants to match cost reports as follows: Hydrophonics $14,424, Repro Arborist $4,429, COVID $10,052 and, UMOS $4,987. All programs had losses after the reclassification adjustments, and, therefore, no revenue received from the City of Milwaukee was unused by the programs. 6) Questioned costs: See consideration of losses by program noted in the Effect. 7) Prevalence or consequence: The process was in place throughout the year. 8) Repeated audit finding: This is not a repeat finding. 9) Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: It is recommended that the worksheet used to allocate salaries based on timesheets be used to also create grant cost reports. In addition, it is recommended that the timesheets be regularly reviewed and updated to include all programs, agency wide work, and fundraising to account for all possible activities. It is also recommended that the cost reports be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis. 10) Views of responsible officials at auditee: Timesheets will be updated to reflect all active programs and support functions. The worksheet that is used to compile employee hours will be used to allocate in the financial system and on the grant cost reports so that all systems align. Responsible Employee: Tony Kearney is responsible for determining that the system is updated by the accounting department. Corrective Action Implementation Date: September 2024.

Corrective Action Plan

Timesheets will be updated to reflect all active programs and support functions. The worksheet that is used to compile employee hours will be used for allocations in the financial system and on the grant cost reports, so that all systems align. Tony Kearney Sr. is responsible for compliance and the implementation is expected in September 2024.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,071,807 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 23, 2023 — management decision was due February 23, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,466,199 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2022 — management decision was due March 27, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

$1,224,851 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2021 — management decision was due January 11, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

$1,312,356 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 22, 2020 — management decision was due May 22, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

GOING CONCERN$1,619,166 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 22, 2019 — management decision was due February 22, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

GOING CONCERN$1,226,079 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 6, 2018 — management decision was due March 6, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

GOING CONCERN$1,203,087 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2017 — management decision was due March 28, 2018.

2016-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.