← Back to home

CHIPPEWA VALLEY SCHOOLSLocal Government

EIN: 386034009

UEI: PZKAF912HAY6

Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CHIPPEWA VALLEY SCHOOLS10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$12M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$12,010,973 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 15, 2026 (76 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 10.553 and 10.555, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 241960, 251960, 241970, and 251970 Pass through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The School District is required to have processes that comply with applicable procurement rules in the Uniform Guidance, including initial identification of those requirements and subsequent compliance per 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327, as well as contain required contract provisions for cost reimbursable contracts per the provisions in 7 CFR 210.21(f), 7 CFR 210.21(d)(3), and 7 CFR 220.16(d)(3). Condition The School District's internal controls did not effectively identify all of the required components necessary in formal solicitation documents for food service/cost reimbursable contracts and when using a third party entity (e.g., consortium) and did not utilize competitive procurement methods. Questioned Costs - None If Questioned Costs are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context- It was noted that the School District was not required to competitively bid any purchases during fiscal year 2025. Cause and Effect - Conducting solicitations or entering into contracts that do not follow the appropriate competitive procurement guidelines could result in the School District having an unallowable contract under the provisions of the grant and/or questioned costs. Recommendation - The School District should examine its processes and controls surrounding competitive procurement methods for the food service program to verify inclusions of the requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - As a result of a rotational School Nutrition Programs Procurement Review, as administered by the Office of School Nutrition Services within the Michigan Department of Education (MDE), general procurement findings were identified in the food service program. To address, the School District is revising its food service procurement documents to explicitly include all required contract provisions under the Uniform Guidance. The School District is also incorporating recent interpretations and guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), as communicated through MDE, particularly regarding cooperative purchasing and pricing structures for federal compliance. These actions are intended to strengthen the procurement controls to ensure all future food service contracts meet the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance and USDA regulations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 10.553 and 10.555, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 241960, 251960, 241970, and 251970 Pass through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The School District is required to have processes that comply with applicable procurement rules in the Uniform Guidance, including initial identification of those requirements and subsequent compliance per 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327, as well as contain required contract provisions for cost reimbursable contracts per the provisions in 7 CFR 210.21(f), 7 CFR 210.21(d)(3), and 7 CFR 220.16(d)(3). Condition The School District's internal controls did not effectively identify all of the required components necessary in formal solicitation documents for food service/cost reimbursable contracts and when using a third party entity (e.g., consortium) and did not utilize competitive procurement methods. Questioned Costs - None If Questioned Costs are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context- It was noted that the School District was not required to competitively bid any purchases during fiscal year 2025. Cause and Effect - Conducting solicitations or entering into contracts that do not follow the appropriate competitive procurement guidelines could result in the School District having an unallowable contract under the provisions of the grant and/or questioned costs. Recommendation - The School District should examine its processes and controls surrounding competitive procurement methods for the food service program to verify inclusions of the requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - As a result of a rotational School Nutrition Programs Procurement Review, as administered by the Office of School Nutrition Services within the Michigan Department of Education (MDE), general procurement findings were identified in the food service program. To address, the School District is revising its food service procurement documents to explicitly include all required contract provisions under the Uniform Guidance. The School District is also incorporating recent interpretations and guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), as communicated through MDE, particularly regarding cooperative purchasing and pricing structures for federal compliance. These actions are intended to strengthen the procurement controls to ensure all future food service contracts meet the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance and USDA regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The School District's internal controls did not effectively identify all of the required components necessary in formal solicitation documents for food service/cost reimbursable contracts and when using a third party entity (e.g., consortium) and did not utilize competitive procurement methods. Planned Corrective Action: The School District is revising its food service procurement documents to explicitly include all required contract provisions under the Uniform Guidance. The School District is also incorporating recent interpretations and guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), as communicated through MDE, particularly regarding cooperative purchasing and pricing structures for federal compliance. These actions are intended to strengthen the procurement controls to ensure all future food service contracts meet the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance and USDA regulations. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Danielle Jacobs, Director of Business Services Anticipated Completion Date: 8/15/2025

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,734,444 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 4, 2024 — management decision was due April 4, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 10.553 and 10.555, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 241960, 230910, 240910, and 241970 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The School District must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim (7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15 (c)). Upon preparation of meal reimbursement claims, the School District is required to have controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the request for reimbursement. Condition - The School District does not currently have a control in place where a review of the meal counts entered into the Michigan Nutrition Data (MiND) system takes place, which could result in incorrect reporting of the number of free and reduced priced meals, which could result in the School District being reimbursed an incorrect amount by the Michigan Department of Education. Questioned Costs - $9,438 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The entire population of claims submitted was recalculated by the School District. Context - It was noted that the School District submitted for reimbursement with inaccurate information for seven months during the fiscal year. There were 3,062 overclaimed free breakfast/lunch meals and 2,838 overclaimed reduced breakfast/lunch meals. Cause and Effect - The absence of a secondary review comparing meal data from the School District's meal tracking point of sale system to the inputs into the MiND system resulted in the School District being reimbursed for inaccurate amounts. Recommendation - The School District should implement a control where the monthly reimbursement request is reviewed and approval is documented to ensure the submission is mechanically accurate and that it agrees with the School District’s internal meal claims data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - As a result of errors identified during the audit, the School District’s Business Office performed a detailed review of all meal claim submissions for the 2023/2024 fiscal year. An offsetting amount of underclaimed meal reimbursements was identified which nets against the overclaimed meal reimbursements, resulting in an aggregate underclaim of $2,243.18 when looking at the entire fiscal year in total. Ultimately, the School District did not request funds beyond which it was eligible to claim over the span of the fiscal year. The Business Office has since implemented a formalized internal control procedure for the Food Service Department to adhere, alongside performing a thorough review of the monthly claims reimbursement submission.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 10.553 and 10.555, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 241960, 230910, 240910, and 241970 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The School District must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim (7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15 (c)). Upon preparation of meal reimbursement claims, the School District is required to have controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the request for reimbursement. Condition - The School District does not currently have a control in place where a review of the meal counts entered into the Michigan Nutrition Data (MiND) system takes place, which could result in incorrect reporting of the number of free and reduced priced meals, which could result in the School District being reimbursed an incorrect amount by the Michigan Department of Education. Questioned Costs - $9,438 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The entire population of claims submitted was recalculated by the School District. Context - It was noted that the School District submitted for reimbursement with inaccurate information for seven months during the fiscal year. There were 3,062 overclaimed free breakfast/lunch meals and 2,838 overclaimed reduced breakfast/lunch meals. Cause and Effect - The absence of a secondary review comparing meal data from the School District's meal tracking point of sale system to the inputs into the MiND system resulted in the School District being reimbursed for inaccurate amounts. Recommendation - The School District should implement a control where the monthly reimbursement request is reviewed and approval is documented to ensure the submission is mechanically accurate and that it agrees with the School District’s internal meal claims data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - As a result of errors identified during the audit, the School District’s Business Office performed a detailed review of all meal claim submissions for the 2023/2024 fiscal year. An offsetting amount of underclaimed meal reimbursements was identified which nets against the overclaimed meal reimbursements, resulting in an aggregate underclaim of $2,243.18 when looking at the entire fiscal year in total. Ultimately, the School District did not request funds beyond which it was eligible to claim over the span of the fiscal year. The Business Office has since implemented a formalized internal control procedure for the Food Service Department to adhere, alongside performing a thorough review of the monthly claims reimbursement submission.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The School District does not currently have a control in place whereby a review of the meal counts entered into the Michigan Nutrition Data (MiND) system takes place, which could result in an incorrect reporting of the number of free and reduced priced meals, which could result in the School District being reimbursed an incorrect amount by the Michigan Department of Education. Planned Corrective Action: The Business Office has implemented a formalized internal control procedure for the Food Service Department to adhere, alongside performing a thorough review of the monthly claims reimbursement submission. The formalized internal control procedure will accompany the supporting documentation submitted to the Business Office monthly (Attachment A). The procedure involves a review of inputted meal counts, prior to the claim submission. The Food Service Department Administrator responsible for meal claim input will provide corroboration of input accuracy, as documented by signoff from a secondary reviewer. In addition, the Business Office has prepared a Meal Claim Check Tool spreadsheet to utilize, on a monthly basis, as another layer of validation. The Meal Claim Check Tool spreadsheet allows the Business Office to input meal count figures from the Food Service POS system report and compare against the figures from the claims submission report. Any discrepancy identified would be immediately addressed with the Food Service Department and would require an amended claim submission. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Danielle Jacobs, Director of Business Services Anticipated Completion Date: 08/01/2024

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,868,914 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2024 — management decision was due July 18, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$33,185,579 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 20, 2022 — management decision was due May 20, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,991,974 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 13, 2021 — management decision was due April 13, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,414,281 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2020 — management decision was due May 9, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,305,892 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2019 — management decision was due April 23, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,890,020 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 22, 2018 — management decision was due April 22, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,420,879 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 1, 2017 — management decision was due April 1, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,993,288 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 12, 2016 — management decision was due April 12, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.