← Back to home

Birch Run Area SchoolsLocal Government

EIN: 386021795

UEI: TDYXD8TMM9M5

Audited by: Yeo and Yeo, PC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Birch Run Area Schools10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,069,482 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 8, 2026 (83 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,046,462 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 15, 2024 — management decision was due April 15, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,710,644 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2023 — management decision was due May 7, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,030,106 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 18, 2022 — management decision was due April 18, 2023.

2022-001
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Material budget overages were noted in total expenses in the General Fund and Food Service Fund. A material overage was noted in the General Fund for operations and maintenance and in the Food Service Fund for food costs. A material overage was noted in the Education Stabilization Fund for instructional staff and elementary devices. There also was a material budget overage in the Education Stabilization Fund in salaries, benefits and capital outlay when compared to the MEGS budget. Questioned costs: None Cause and effect: Management failed to analyze actual food service expenses and operations and maintenance payments when amending the final budget for the Food Service Fund and General Fund, respectively. Recommendation: We recommend that management monitor the budget throughout the year and follow the established policies regarding budget preparation and implementation. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding. Corrective action plan: See attached corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance ? Budget Variances / Allowable Costs Program information: Education Stabilization Fund, U.S. Department of Education, passed through Michigan Department of Education, AL #84.425, Passthrough grantor numbers 213712 and 213713. Criteria: Sections 18 and 19 (MCL 141.438 and 141.439) of the Uniform Budgeting and Accounting Act state that an administrative officer of the local unit shall not incur expenditures against an appropriation account in excess of the amount appropriated by the legislative body. Additionally, the chief administrative officer, an administrative officer, or an employee of the local unit shall not apply or divert money for purposes inconsistent with those specified in the appropriations. Condition: Material budget overages were noted in total expenses in the General Fund and Food Service Fund. A material overage was noted in the General Fund for operations and maintenance and in the Food Service Fund for food costs. A material overage was noted in the Education Stabilization Fund for instructional staff and elementary devices. There also was a material budget overage in the Education Stabilization Fund in salaries, benefits and capital outlay when compared to the MEGS budget. Questioned costs: None Cause and effect: Management failed to analyze actual food service expenses and operations and maintenance payments when amending the final budget for the Food Service Fund and General Fund, respectively. Recommendation: We recommend that management monitor the budget throughout the year and follow the established policies regarding budget preparation and implementation. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding. Corrective action plan: See attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-001 ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance ? Budget Variances / Allowable Costs Corrective Action Plan: Analyze actual expenditures monthly, review the budget to actual numbers monthly and use data from this review to prepare a more accurate final budget revision. Responsible Parties: Rod Livingston, Business Manager Anticipated complete date of June 30, 2023 Rod Livingston Business Manager

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,966,757 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2021 — management decision was due April 10, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,433,130 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 19, 2020 — management decision was due April 19, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,203,673 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 17, 2019 — management decision was due March 17, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,191,857 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2018 — management decision was due March 30, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,191,743 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 22, 2017 — management decision was due April 22, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,133,800 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 11, 2016 — management decision was due April 11, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.