← Back to home

City of Grosse Pointe Farms, MichiganLocal Government

EIN: 386007222

UEI: ML71RFMRJWX5

Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

City of Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan2 audit years1 findings
2
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,475,090 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 18, 2026 (86 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,094,467 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2024 — management decision was due June 11, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 97.039, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Not applicable Pass through Entity - Michigan State Police Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a) - The recipient and subrecipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - There is no evidence of review of the reports submitted to the funding agency. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Based on the grant award date, the City submitted three quarterly reports. There was no evidence that the reports were reviewed prior to submission. Cause and Effect - The reports were not reviewed for completeness and accuracy prior to submission, and, as a result, the year end quarterly report included costs that were estimated to be 25 percent of the grant award rather than the actual costs incurred to date. Recommendation - The City should implement controls to ensure that reports are reviewed for completeness and accuracy prior to submission to the funding agency. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The City has implemented controls to have a secondary review of reports prior to submission to the funding agency.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 97.039, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Not applicable Pass through Entity - Michigan State Police Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a) - The recipient and subrecipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - There is no evidence of review of the reports submitted to the funding agency. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Based on the grant award date, the City submitted three quarterly reports. There was no evidence that the reports were reviewed prior to submission. Cause and Effect - The reports were not reviewed for completeness and accuracy prior to submission, and, as a result, the year end quarterly report included costs that were estimated to be 25 percent of the grant award rather than the actual costs incurred to date. Recommendation - The City should implement controls to ensure that reports are reviewed for completeness and accuracy prior to submission to the funding agency. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The City has implemented controls to have a secondary review of reports prior to submission to the funding agency.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2024-001 Condition: There is no evidence of review of reports submitted to the funding agency. Planned Corrective Action: The City of Grosse Pointe Farms has hired additional staff in the accounting department that will complete review of reports prior to submission to the funding agency. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Tim Rowland, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: 09/03/2024

About Reporting →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.