EIN: 386006420
UEI: LDRRE6AP5KB3
Audited by: UHY, LLP
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 24, 2027 (136 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025 — management decision was due March 30, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2024 — management decision was due March 27, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2023 — management decision was due March 25, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2022 — management decision was due March 26, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 7, 2021 — management decision was due April 7, 2022.
The County did not have adequate controls over certain transactions charged to CRF to ensure costs were not requested for reimbursement that were also charged to other grants or funding sources. Context: Certain charges to CRF did not have adequate controls over compliance to ensure costs were not requested for reimbursement under other grants or funding sources. Cause: The County received notifications of CRF awards and, in certain cases, requirements for use and full amounts that were to be received were unknown. Upon receipt of requirements and funding amounts, allowable expenditures were analyzed and charges were transferred from original accounts to CRF grant related accounts. Effect: Expenditures could have been requested for reimbursement from more than one source. Recommendation: We recommend a review procedure be put in place to ensure allowable costs are only requested from one source for which they could apply. View of responsible officials and planned corrected action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-002: Controls over Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) Type: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires entities to design internal control over compliance requirements for federal awards to provide reasonable assurance transactions are properly recorded and accounted for, transactions are executed in compliance with federal awards, and funds are safeguarded. Condition: The County did not have adequate controls over certain transactions charged to CRF to ensure costs were not requested for reimbursement that were also charged to other grants or funding sources. Context: Certain charges to CRF did not have adequate controls over compliance to ensure costs were not requested for reimbursement under other grants or funding sources. Cause: The County received notifications of CRF awards and, in certain cases, requirements for use and full amounts that were to be received were unknown. Upon receipt of requirements and funding amounts, allowable expenditures were analyzed and charges were transferred from original accounts to CRF grant related accounts. Effect: Expenditures could have been requested for reimbursement from more than one source. Recommendation: We recommend a review procedure be put in place to ensure allowable costs are only requested from one source for which they could apply. View of responsible officials and planned corrected action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
The County strives to ensure that they have separate accounts for recording all revenues and expenditures for federal grants. The county had hired new staff that were in charge of these federal grants and due to the pandemic, they were not properly trained on the reporting processes. The County has since taken steps to mitigate the situation and have trained the new staff accountants and going forward plan to have all journal entries reviewed by Dena Alderdyce, Finance Director. These entries will in turn be checked to internal reports to verify the costs are accurate and allowable. We appreciate the opportunity to submit our corrective action plan to the findings reported in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for the year ended December 31, 2020. We believe the implementation of the aforementioned comments, suggestions and our improvements and/or changes in procedures will not only correct the findings, but prevent them from reoccurring in the future.
FAC accepted this audit on August 24, 2020 — management decision was due February 24, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on July 8, 2019 — management decision was due January 8, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2018 — management decision was due March 24, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2017 — management decision was due December 20, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
