← Back to home

County of WashtenawLocal Government

EIN: 386004894

UEI: M5WKMFUV9GA4

Audited by: Rehmann Robson LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

County of Washtenaw10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$30.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$30,550,898 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 15, 2026 (74 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

$60,819,943 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2025 — management decision was due December 13, 2025.

2024-003
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Lack of Subrecipient Monitoring Activities Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Home Investment Partnerships Program (ALN 14.239); Direct award and Pass-through: Michigan State Housing Development Authority; All project numbers. Criteria. Under 2 CFR Part 200.332(e), the pass through-entity must monitor the activities of a subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. Condition. The County performed financial monitoring procedures during the year and obtained and reviewed subrecipient single audit reports from those subrecipients who were required to have single audits performed under 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. However, the County could not provide evidence that programmatic or performance monitoring to ensure that the stated goals and objectives of the subaward program were achieved during the year, and as such did not comply with all necessary subrecipient monitoring requirements during the year as required in 2 CFR Part 200.332(e). Cause. The County does not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure all aspects of subrecipient monitoring were performed in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect. The County did not follow all federal requirements for subrecipient monitoring and as a result has not completed all monitoring requirements for pass-through entities. Questioned Costs. None. Recommendation. We recommend that the County review its procedures for subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. In the past, the County has had established procedures which included desk reviews and documented program monitoring of subrecipient programs, and it appears that not all of those procedures have remained in place due to staff turnover. The County should review, update, and implement procedures to ensure that those required elements of internal control are carried out by the responsible County department.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of Subrecipient Monitoring Activities Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Home Investment Partnerships Program (ALN 14.239); Direct award and Pass-through: Michigan State Housing Development Authority; All project numbers. Criteria. Under 2 CFR Part 200.332(e), the pass through-entity must monitor the activities of a subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. Condition. The County performed financial monitoring procedures during the year and obtained and reviewed subrecipient single audit reports from those subrecipients who were required to have single audits performed under 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. However, the County could not provide evidence that programmatic or performance monitoring to ensure that the stated goals and objectives of the subaward program were achieved during the year, and as such did not comply with all necessary subrecipient monitoring requirements during the year as required in 2 CFR Part 200.332(e). Cause. The County does not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure all aspects of subrecipient monitoring were performed in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect. The County did not follow all federal requirements for subrecipient monitoring and as a result has not completed all monitoring requirements for pass-through entities. Questioned Costs. None. Recommendation. We recommend that the County review its procedures for subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. In the past, the County has had established procedures which included desk reviews and documented program monitoring of subrecipient programs, and it appears that not all of those procedures have remained in place due to staff turnover. The County should review, update, and implement procedures to ensure that those required elements of internal control are carried out by the responsible County department.

Corrective Action Plan

Lack of Subrecipient Monitoring Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: Under 2 CFR Part 200.332(e), the pass through-entity must monitor the activities of a subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. The County performed financial monitoring procedures during the year and obtained and reviewed subrecipient single audit reports from those subrecipients who were required to have single audits performed under 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. However, the County could not provide evidence that programmatic or performance monitoring to ensure that the stated goals and objectives of the subaward program were achieved during the year, and as such did not comply with all necessary subrecipient monitoring requirements during the year as required in 2 CFR Part 200.332(e). The County did not follow all federal requirements for subrecipient monitoring and as a result has not completed all monitoring requirements for pass-through entities. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its procedures for subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. In the past, the County has had established procedures which included desk reviews and documented program monitoring of subrecipient programs, and it appears that not all of those procedures have remained in place due to staff turnover. The County should review, update, and implement procedures to ensure that those required elements of internal control are carried out by the responsible County department. Corrective Action: The Office of Community and Economic Development will implement a subrecipient monitoring policy specific to grants and operations including a schedule of monitoring and risk assessment. OCED program and finance staff will undergo training specific to subrecipient monitoring to ensure alignment in policies across programs. The OCED Finance and Operations Division Administrator will lead subrecipient monitoring activities and will coordinate as necessary with other OCED department division administrators to develop a monitoring schedule and communication plan for subrecipients. Washtenaw County Finance will assist in developing this subrecipient monitoring policy and will perform an overall review of all subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance and consistency across departments and programs. Responsible Person: Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: December 2025

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2023-12-31

$46,400,316 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 9, 2024 — management decision was due November 9, 2024.

2023-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Reporting Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants (ALN 14.218); Direct award; All project numbers. Criteria. Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Direct recipients must report key data elements by registering through the FSRS and reporting subaward data through that system. Direct recipients that are awarded a federal grant are required to file a FFATA sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime awardee awards any sub-grant equal to or greater than $30,000. Condition. The County did not submit the required key data elements through the FSRS reporting system as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause. The County does not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure that FFATA reporting is completed promptly in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect. The County did not follow federal requirements for FFATA reporting through the FSRS and as a result has not completed the appropriate sub-award reporting that is required for direct recipients. Questioned Costs. None. Recommendation. We recommend that the County review its procedures for FFATA reporting through FSRS and ensure that all key data elements are reported timely moving forward. View of Responsible Officials. The County will ensure that its procedures for FFATA reporting on all required grants are updated to ensure future compliance with this requirement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Reporting Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants (ALN 14.218); Direct award; All project numbers. Criteria. Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Direct recipients must report key data elements by registering through the FSRS and reporting subaward data through that system. Direct recipients that are awarded a federal grant are required to file a FFATA sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime awardee awards any sub-grant equal to or greater than $30,000. Condition. The County did not submit the required key data elements through the FSRS reporting system as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause. The County does not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure that FFATA reporting is completed promptly in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect. The County did not follow federal requirements for FFATA reporting through the FSRS and as a result has not completed the appropriate sub-award reporting that is required for direct recipients. Questioned Costs. None. Recommendation. We recommend that the County review its procedures for FFATA reporting through FSRS and ensure that all key data elements are reported timely moving forward. View of Responsible Officials. The County will ensure that its procedures for FFATA reporting on all required grants are updated to ensure future compliance with this requirement.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2023-001 – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Reporting Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Direct recipients must report key data elements by registering through the FSRS and reporting subaward data through that system. Direct recipients that are awarded a federal grant are required to file a FFATA sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime awardee awards any sub-grant equal to or greater than $30,000. The County did not submit the required key data elements through the FSRS reporting system as required by the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the County did not follow federal requirements for FFATA reporting through the FSRS and as a result has not completed the appropriate sub-award reporting that is required for direct recipients. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its procedures for FFATA reporting through FSRS and ensure that all key data elements are reported timely moving forward. Corrective Action: The County will ensure that its procedures for FFATA reporting on all required grants are updated to ensure future compliance with this requirement. Responsible Person: Ellis Johnson II, Finance and Operations Manager (Office of Community and Economic Development) Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024

About Reporting →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$38,290,050 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2023 — management decision was due November 12, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

$42,110,182 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 26, 2022 — management decision was due October 26, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

$34,625,349 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2021 — management decision was due October 28, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

$20,285,724 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 4, 2020 — management decision was due November 4, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

$17,547,642 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2019 — management decision was due November 14, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

$15,669,335 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 18, 2018 — management decision was due October 18, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

$19,855,674 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2017 — management decision was due October 28, 2017.

2016-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.