EIN: 386004845
UEI: JZAMCVAFGAU8
Audited by: Clark Schaefer Hackett
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 16, 2027 (136 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2025 — management decision was due December 26, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2024 — management decision was due December 28, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2023 — management decision was due December 29, 2023.
2022-001 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Treasury ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA# 21.027) Criteria. A recipient of federal awards is required to determine that vendors being paid with federal funds are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the government. Such procedures are required whenever the amount disbursed to a single vendor in a given fiscal year is expected to be at least $25,000. Also, recipients of federal awards are required to ensure that federal procurement standards are followed for any purchases over the federal micropurchase threshold. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that these purchases must adhere to one of the allowable procurement methods (sealed bids, competitive proposals, noncompetitive procurement) and maintain documentation of this procurement decision. Condition. The County charged costs for multiple vendors to federal grants that they determined fell under noncompetitive procurement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. However, documentation was not obtained to support such determinations. Cause. This condition is a result of the County not properly documenting procurement methodology. Effect. As a result of this condition, several vendors paid with federal funding appeared to be procured in a manner not in accordance with federal regulations. Questioned Costs. No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the County implement a policy to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. View of Responsible Officials. The County agrees that a policy needs to be implemented to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. Responsible Officials. Finance Director Estimated Completion Date. December 31, 2023
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-001 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Treasury ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA# 21.027) Criteria. A recipient of federal awards is required to determine that vendors being paid with federal funds are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the government. Such procedures are required whenever the amount disbursed to a single vendor in a given fiscal year is expected to be at least $25,000. Also, recipients of federal awards are required to ensure that federal procurement standards are followed for any purchases over the federal micropurchase threshold. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that these purchases must adhere to one of the allowable procurement methods (sealed bids, competitive proposals, noncompetitive procurement) and maintain documentation of this procurement decision. Condition. The County charged costs for multiple vendors to federal grants that they determined fell under noncompetitive procurement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. However, documentation was not obtained to support such determinations. Cause. This condition is a result of the County not properly documenting procurement methodology. Effect. As a result of this condition, several vendors paid with federal funding appeared to be procured in a manner not in accordance with federal regulations. Questioned Costs. No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the County implement a policy to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. View of Responsible Officials. The County agrees that a policy needs to be implemented to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. Responsible Officials. Finance Director Estimated Completion Date. December 31, 2023
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Pursuant to Federal Regulations, Uniform Administrative Requirements Section 200.511, the following are the findings as noted in County of Jackson, Michigan?s Single Audit report for the year ended December 31, 2022, and corrective actions to be completed. 2022-001 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. The County charged costs for multiple vendors to federal grants that they determined fell under noncompetitive procurement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. However, documentation was not obtained to support such determinations. As a result of this condition, several vendors paid with federal funding appeared to be procured in a manner not in accordance with federal regulations. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the County implement a policy to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. Corrective Action. The County agrees that a policy needs to be implemented to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. Responsible Person: Cecilia Anderson, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2023
FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2022 — management decision was due December 28, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2021 — management decision was due December 30, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2020 — management decision was due December 29, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2019 — management decision was due December 26, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on July 5, 2018 — management decision was due January 5, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on July 2, 2017 — management decision was due January 2, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
