← Back to home

STURGIS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTNon-Profit

EIN: 386003657

UEI: JXHNS3JYERZ4

Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

STURGIS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years7 findings
10
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,586,962 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 16, 2026 (76 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,389,075 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2024 — management decision was due April 29, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,962,615 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2024 — management decision was due July 3, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,718,344 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 26, 2022 — management decision was due April 26, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,207,888 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 21, 2021 — management decision was due April 21, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$2,690,336 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2020 — management decision was due May 9, 2021.

2020-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Finding Type - Significant deficiency Criteria - The School District's internal control structure should ensure that accounting data is properly calculated and reported for current liabilities and expenditures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Condition - The School District's general ledger contained certain adjusting journal entries that were required to reflect accurate accounts payable and related expenditure balances as of June 30, 2020. The School District is required to ensure that items are recorded within the correct fiscal year and that proper cutoff procedures are performed. These audit adjustments were proposed by the auditors. Context - Adjustments were made to the Energy Conservation Improvement Fund to record retainage payable that had not been recorded in the general ledger in the proper period. Cause - The School District had improperly excluded the retainage payable due as of year end prior to the audit adjusting entries. Effect - Prior to the adjustments identified, certain retainage payable and related expenditure accounts in the Energy Conservation Improvement Fund related to ongoing construction activity did not have accurate balances in accordance with GAAP. These items were not corrected by management during the audit process. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District implement procedures to ensure recording of retainage payable balances in the proper period during the year-end closing procedures and seek appropriate guidance for properly analyzing ongoing construction activity.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Type - Significant deficiency Criteria - The School District's internal control structure should ensure that accounting data is properly calculated and reported for current liabilities and expenditures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Condition - The School District's general ledger contained certain adjusting journal entries that were required to reflect accurate accounts payable and related expenditure balances as of June 30, 2020. The School District is required to ensure that items are recorded within the correct fiscal year and that proper cutoff procedures are performed. These audit adjustments were proposed by the auditors. Context - Adjustments were made to the Energy Conservation Improvement Fund to record retainage payable that had not been recorded in the general ledger in the proper period. Cause - The School District had improperly excluded the retainage payable due as of year end prior to the audit adjusting entries. Effect - Prior to the adjustments identified, certain retainage payable and related expenditure accounts in the Energy Conservation Improvement Fund related to ongoing construction activity did not have accurate balances in accordance with GAAP. These items were not corrected by management during the audit process. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District implement procedures to ensure recording of retainage payable balances in the proper period during the year-end closing procedures and seek appropriate guidance for properly analyzing ongoing construction activity.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The Sturgis Public School District agrees with the above recommendation. The School District will continue to use its resources to adequately review and revise year-end closing procedures to make certain all account balance reconciliations are completed accurately before the annual audit.

About Eligibility →
2020-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, Child Nutrition Cluster, U.S. Department of Agriculture None Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 190900/191900 (2019- 2020), 191970/201970 (2019-2020), 191960/201960/201980 (2019-2020), 200902 (2019-2020) Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The School District's procedures should be designed to ensure that students receive the benefits for which they qualify. The School District is required to determine annually a child's eligibility for free or reduced meals based on the child's family income and family size or based on the child's household receiving benefits under various other federal programs per 7 CFR Section 225.15(f). Condition - One student tested for eligibility received reduced lunch; however, no eligibility documentation was maintained; thus, the student was deemed ineligible to receive the benefit. The School District's procedure for maintaining supporting documentation was not sufficient to prevent the error. Questioned Costs - None greater than $25,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned costs were determined by totaling the reduced benefits received by the student less the full pay that the student should have been required to pay. The error identified resulted in a known error of approximately $655 based on the changes in eligibility. Context - In 1 out of the 60 student applications reviewed, the proper documentation was not maintained. The student was provided the benefit of reduced lunch for the whole year. Cause and Effect - Applications are completed on paper or online and printed, at which time the application is filed for record-keeping purposes. Procedures were not followed to ensure proper documents obtained from students were retained. Recommendation - The School District's procedures should include a detailed review and tracking system for all applications filed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, Child Nutrition Cluster, U.S. Department of Agriculture None Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 190900/191900 (2019- 2020), 191970/201970 (2019-2020), 191960/201960/201980 (2019-2020), 200902 (2019-2020) Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The School District's procedures should be designed to ensure that students receive the benefits for which they qualify. The School District is required to determine annually a child's eligibility for free or reduced meals based on the child's family income and family size or based on the child's household receiving benefits under various other federal programs per 7 CFR Section 225.15(f). Condition - One student tested for eligibility received reduced lunch; however, no eligibility documentation was maintained; thus, the student was deemed ineligible to receive the benefit. The School District's procedure for maintaining supporting documentation was not sufficient to prevent the error. Questioned Costs - None greater than $25,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned costs were determined by totaling the reduced benefits received by the student less the full pay that the student should have been required to pay. The error identified resulted in a known error of approximately $655 based on the changes in eligibility. Context - In 1 out of the 60 student applications reviewed, the proper documentation was not maintained. The student was provided the benefit of reduced lunch for the whole year. Cause and Effect - Applications are completed on paper or online and printed, at which time the application is filed for record-keeping purposes. Procedures were not followed to ensure proper documents obtained from students were retained. Recommendation - The School District's procedures should include a detailed review and tracking system for all applications filed.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Sturgis Public School District agrees with the recommendation. The School District will implement a detailed review and tracking system for all applications filed, increasing the ability to accurately locate applications for the free and reduced meal program.

About Eligibility →

FY 2019-06-30

$2,700,618 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2019 — management decision was due April 24, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,614,735 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2018 — management decision was due May 7, 2019.

2018-004
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,585,319 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2017 — management decision was due April 17, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,767,447 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2016 — management decision was due May 1, 2017.

2016-001
Equipment & Real Property
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.