← Back to home

COMSTOCK PUBLIC SCHOOLSLocal Government

EIN: 386001926

UEI: J8DUUXHCBF54

Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

COMSTOCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,037,537 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 19, 2026 (83 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.010, Michigan Department of Education, Title I Regional Assistance Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 2025 Pass through Entity Kalamazoo Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type- Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Pursuant to federal regulations governing Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the School District is required to ensure grant funds are spent only for allowable costs incurred in eligible school buildings. Condition - The School District charged an expenditure to the grant that was incurred in a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Questioned Costs- $2,952 If Questioned Costs Are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Questioned costs of $2,952 resulted from the School District charging an expenditure to the grant that was incurred in a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Context - Of the 12 non payroll transactions selected for testing that were charged to this grant, 1 transaction was incurred by a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Cause and Effect - The School District was not aware expenditures charged to the Title 1 Regional Assistance Grant were only to be incurred by school buildings that were eligible for Title 1 services within the School District's annual Consolidated Application. Upon discovery, the client conducted a comprehensive review of all Title I expenditures by building and confirmed that this was the only expenditure charged to an ineligible building. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District enhance its internal controls to ensure expenditures are charged only to eligible school buildings. Specifically, the School District should implement a verification step during the grant budgeting and expenditure review process to confirm building eligibility prior to charging costs to the Title I grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The associate accountant will ensure the assistant superintendent’s signature is on all invoices charged to federal grants, including the Title 1 Regional Assistance Grant. The finance director will ensure this during the invoice approval process. The finance director and assistant superintendent meet monthly to discuss federal grants, which includes the Title 1 Regional Assistance Grant. Part of this meeting is to discuss known expenditures for federal grants so far this year to ensure they are properly coded and expended. The finance director will run a general ledger analysis every two months to compare posted grant expenditures to approved grant budgets. Expenditures in question will be discussed at monthly meetings. Any determined to be incorrect will be moved to nongrant accounts via journal entry, most likely prepared by the finance director and approved by the associate accountant.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.010, Michigan Department of Education, Title I Regional Assistance Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 2025 Pass through Entity Kalamazoo Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type- Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Pursuant to federal regulations governing Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the School District is required to ensure grant funds are spent only for allowable costs incurred in eligible school buildings. Condition - The School District charged an expenditure to the grant that was incurred in a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Questioned Costs- $2,952 If Questioned Costs Are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Questioned costs of $2,952 resulted from the School District charging an expenditure to the grant that was incurred in a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Context - Of the 12 non payroll transactions selected for testing that were charged to this grant, 1 transaction was incurred by a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Cause and Effect - The School District was not aware expenditures charged to the Title 1 Regional Assistance Grant were only to be incurred by school buildings that were eligible for Title 1 services within the School District's annual Consolidated Application. Upon discovery, the client conducted a comprehensive review of all Title I expenditures by building and confirmed that this was the only expenditure charged to an ineligible building. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District enhance its internal controls to ensure expenditures are charged only to eligible school buildings. Specifically, the School District should implement a verification step during the grant budgeting and expenditure review process to confirm building eligibility prior to charging costs to the Title I grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The associate accountant will ensure the assistant superintendent’s signature is on all invoices charged to federal grants, including the Title 1 Regional Assistance Grant. The finance director will ensure this during the invoice approval process. The finance director and assistant superintendent meet monthly to discuss federal grants, which includes the Title 1 Regional Assistance Grant. Part of this meeting is to discuss known expenditures for federal grants so far this year to ensure they are properly coded and expended. The finance director will run a general ledger analysis every two months to compare posted grant expenditures to approved grant budgets. Expenditures in question will be discussed at monthly meetings. Any determined to be incorrect will be moved to nongrant accounts via journal entry, most likely prepared by the finance director and approved by the associate accountant.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The School District charged an expenditure to the grant which was incurred in a school building that was not an eligible school building under the award. Planned Corrective Action: Associate Accountant will ensure the Assistant Superintendent’s signature is on all invoices charged to federal grants including the Regional Assistance Grant. The Finance Director will ensure this during the invoice approval process. Finance Director and Assistant Superintendent meet monthly to discuss federal grants which includes the Regional Assistance Grant. Part of this meeting is to discuss known expenditures for federal grants so far this year to ensure they are properly coded and expended. Finance Director will run a general ledger analysis every two months to compare posted grant expenditures to approved grant budgets. Expenditures in question will be discussed at monthly meetings. Any determined to be incorrect will be moved to non-grant accounts via journal entry most likely prepared by Finance Director and approved by Associate Accountant. Contact person responsible for corrective action: RJ Wiersema and Jill Ansel Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,955,652 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2024 — management decision was due May 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$6,274,714 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2024 — management decision was due August 6, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$4,548,783 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2022 — management decision was due June 5, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,221,982 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2021 — management decision was due May 11, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$3,270,838 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2021 — management decision was due July 5, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,324,017 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 6, 2019 — management decision was due May 6, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,942,834 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2018 — management decision was due May 1, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,652,249 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2017 — management decision was due April 23, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,671,560 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 26, 2016 — management decision was due April 26, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.