Carman-Ainsworth Community SchoolsLocal Government

EIN: 386001213

UEI: H5UGPVB877L5

Audited by: Yeo & Yeo CPA's and Advisors

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Carman-Ainsworth Community Schools10 audit years5 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$7.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$7,773,706 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 16, 2026 (74 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The School District’s support for the payroll indicated that an incorrect amount was paid for transactions charged to the Food Service Fund. The School District paid 3 of the sample of 40 for payroll testing, the incorrect amount of hours for the employees selected payroll transaction and overall, the 3 items noted were undercharged. Cause and Effect: Failure to properly review balances and reconcile payroll registers for individual pays. This led to employees being paid the incorrect amounts during the fiscal year. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure all expenditures are being paid to employees allocated to the program are correct for rates of pay and actual hours worked. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program: Child Nutrition Cluster, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 10.553 & 10.555, Federal Award #: 241970, 251970, 241960, 251960 Criteria: The School District should maintain internal controls to document salaries and wages that accurately reflect the expenditures incurred and work performed based on Uniform Guidance. The internal controls should provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated as to account and period. Questioned Costs: $2,684 Condition: The School District’s support for the payroll indicated that an incorrect amount was paid for transactions charged to the Food Service Fund. The School District paid 3 of the sample of 40 for payroll testing, the incorrect amount of hours for the employees selected payroll transaction and overall, the 3 items noted were undercharged. Cause and Effect: Failure to properly review balances and reconcile payroll registers for individual pays. This led to employees being paid the incorrect amounts during the fiscal year. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure all expenditures are being paid to employees allocated to the program are correct for rates of pay and actual hours worked. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Carman-Ainsworth Community Schools submits the following corrective action plan concerning finding 2025-001 on the schedule of findings and questioned costs: 2025-001– Significant Deficiency – Noncompliance – Allowable Costs / Payroll Plan – During the audit, we were made aware of 3 instances in which employees were not paid according to their actual hours worked. Due to this finding, the School District business office will review all payroll registers for each pay and match hourly employees timesheets to all registers to ensure actual hours worked are used in calculation. Timetable for Completion – Implementation for this will begin immediately upon issuance of the audit reports. Responsible Officials – Assistant Superintendent

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$9,250,166 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2024 — management decision was due May 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$9,789,918 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2024 — management decision was due September 19, 2024.

2023-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-006QUESTIONED COSTS

During the testing of controls over payroll processing, an employee in the sample was being paid in excess of the contractually approved amount. The District could not provide a rationale or support for wages in excess of the approved contract being paid to a staff charged fully to the Early Head Start grant program.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

During the testing of controls over payroll processing, an employee in the sample was being paid in excess of the contractually approved amount. The District could not provide a rationale or support for wages in excess of the approved contract being paid to a staff charged fully to the Early Head Start grant program.

Corrective Action Plan

The Assistant Superintendent has created a spreadsheet for Early Head Start payroll that shows rate of pay, number of hours, longevity and benefits available with corresponding account numbers. This spreadsheet will be used during the program grant year to verify that payroll charges by employee to the Early Head Start program are consistent with approved contracts .

Prior Finding References

2022-006

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$25,177,840 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2023 — management decision was due October 10, 2023.

2022-006
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001

The District did not maintain supporting documentation for interim grant drawdowns made during the year. Grant revenues were not reconciled with general ledger grant expenditures until year end. When reconciled at year end, $3,505 was overdrawn and due back to the State of Michigan. Context: The District did not have a system in place to properly support grant drawdowns made on an interim basis during the year. As a result interim grant drawdowns may not have reflected actual cash disbursements incurred before or shortly after the drawdown. Cause: The District did not have a system in place to properly support grant drawdowns made on an interim basis during the year. Effect: Audit adjustments were required at year end to record amounts due back to the State for overdrawn grant reimbursements. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should base interim grant draw downs on actual general ledger expenditures and other supporting data and maintain that documentation to support the drawdown amount. View of Responsible Officials: Assistant Superintendent will approval all drawdowns and record documentation in grant notebook

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2022-006 Cash Management Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Over Compliance Program Names: rock and roll hall of fame fan votes Criteria: Cash management principles require that costs are incurred before reimbursement is requested, or related cost disbursements are made shortly after the grant draw down is received. The grant reimbursement should be based on actual costs as evidenced by actual invoices, general ledger detail, or other supporting data. Condition: The District did not maintain supporting documentation for interim grant drawdowns made during the year. Grant revenues were not reconciled with general ledger grant expenditures until year end. When reconciled at year end, $3,505 was overdrawn and due back to the State of Michigan. Context: The District did not have a system in place to properly support grant drawdowns made on an interim basis during the year. As a result interim grant drawdowns may not have reflected actual cash disbursements incurred before or shortly after the drawdown. Cause: The District did not have a system in place to properly support grant drawdowns made on an interim basis during the year. Effect: Audit adjustments were required at year end to record amounts due back to the State for overdrawn grant reimbursements. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should base interim grant draw downs on actual general ledger expenditures and other supporting data and maintain that documentation to support the drawdown amount. View of Responsible Officials: Assistant Superintendent will approval all drawdowns and record documentation in grant notebook

Corrective Action Plan

6. 2022-006 Cash Management - Early Head Start The District did not maintain supporting documentation for interim grant drawdowns made during the year. Grant revenues were not reconciled with general ledger grant expenditures until year end. When reconciled at year end, $3,505 was overdrawn and due back to the State of Michigan. District Corrective Action: Assistant Superintendent will approval all drawdowns and record documentation in grant notebook.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Cash Management →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,616,865 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2021 — management decision was due April 29, 2022.

2021-001
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

The District requested cash reimbursements in excess of program expenditures for the ESSER program. Context: Cash drawdowns for the ESSER program exceeded expenditures for one transaction/event. Cause: Certain program costs were fully funded through grant reimbursement drawdowns when initially purchased. Subsequent to the purchase date, the District received a federally funded rebate of $153,318 based on the purchase price. Future cash requests were not reduced by the amount of the rebate received, and cash was drawn down in excess of expenditures for the ESSER program. Effect: The District was not in compliance with cash management criteria for the ESSER program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should ensure that program costs/activities are specifically identified with the federal funding source from which the reimbursement is requested to ensure grant reimbursement requests are net of other federal program revenues or rebates restricted for the same purpose. View of Responsible Officials: The District is in the process of implementing improved procedures to ensure that grant reimbursement requests are for specific program costs generated by program activities.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 Cash Management Finding Type: Material noncompliance; material weakness in internal controls over compliance Program Names: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund (CFDA 84.425D) Criteria: Compliance with cash management requires that when grant program activities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be funded by available entity resources before reimbursement amounts are requested from the federal government. Condition: The District requested cash reimbursements in excess of program expenditures for the ESSER program. Context: Cash drawdowns for the ESSER program exceeded expenditures for one transaction/event. Cause: Certain program costs were fully funded through grant reimbursement drawdowns when initially purchased. Subsequent to the purchase date, the District received a federally funded rebate of $153,318 based on the purchase price. Future cash requests were not reduced by the amount of the rebate received, and cash was drawn down in excess of expenditures for the ESSER program. Effect: The District was not in compliance with cash management criteria for the ESSER program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should ensure that program costs/activities are specifically identified with the federal funding source from which the reimbursement is requested to ensure grant reimbursement requests are net of other federal program revenues or rebates restricted for the same purpose. View of Responsible Officials: The District is in the process of implementing improved procedures to ensure that grant reimbursement requests are for specific program costs generated by program activities.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan for Audit Findings 1. 2021-001 Cash Management The District requested cash reimbursements in excess of expenditures for the ESSER federal program. District Corrective Action: The District is implementing improved procedures to ensure that grant reimbursement requests are for specific program costs generated by program activities.

About Cash Management →

FY 2020-06-30

$6,226,088 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2020 — management decision was due May 29, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$6,189,849 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2019 — management decision was due April 30, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$5,954,705 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2018 — management decision was due May 1, 2019.

2018-002
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,946,619 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,954,290 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2016 — management decision was due May 1, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.