EIN: 383236412
UEI: PPC7BEEX9SX8
Audited by: Siegfried Crandall P.C.
Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 1, 2025 (486 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Board had appropriate procedures for procurement to conform to the requirements in the Uniform Guidance but did not have its policy in a written form. Cause: The Board’s internal controls over updating its policies for new regulations did not ensure a written procurement policy was in place in a timely manner. Effect: The Board’s procurement policy was not updated in a written form to conform to the new requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Auditor’s Recommendation We recommend management update its procurement policy to conform to the new requirements of the Uniform Guidance and implement monitoring procedures to ensure that policies conform with new regulations in a timely manner. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Per procurement standards contained in Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements Section 200.318, “nonfederal entities must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part.” Condition: The Board had appropriate procedures for procurement to conform to the requirements in the Uniform Guidance but did not have its policy in a written form. Cause: The Board’s internal controls over updating its policies for new regulations did not ensure a written procurement policy was in place in a timely manner. Effect: The Board’s procurement policy was not updated in a written form to conform to the new requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Auditor’s Recommendation We recommend management update its procurement policy to conform to the new requirements of the Uniform Guidance and implement monitoring procedures to ensure that policies conform with new regulations in a timely manner. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Management is in the process of drafting an updated procurement policy to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.