← Back to home

MHP SALUDNon-Profit

EIN: 383092194

UEI: PC56FSR4EPV5

Audited by: Sax LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

MHP SALUD10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$5.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,634,304 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 6, 2027 (160 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,179,653 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2025 — management decision was due January 22, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,671,129 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2024 — management decision was due March 24, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,528,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2023 — management decision was due December 27, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,687,210 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,073,243 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2021 — management decision was due December 28, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,600,589 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 28, 2020 — management decision was due January 28, 2021.

2019-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Organization?s procurement policy did not contain the criteria outlined in the regulation. Cause: The Organization did not update the procurement policy to be in line with the new requirements under Uniform Guidance. Effect: There is a risk that purchases will be made that do not contain the proper bids or be documented in a manner that is consistent with federal guidelines. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The policy did not contain all the criteria for procurement thresholds above the micro purchase level. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management make changes to the current policy to be consistent with the federal requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 ? Procurement Program: 10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Sponsor Award Number: 529-17-0046-00001 Sponsor Agency: Texas Health and Human Services Commission Criteria: The final regulations of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (?UG?) made substantial changes to the cost principles related to procurement effective for the June 30, 2019 year. Under the UG, there are several new methods that must be followed: ? Micro purchases, which apply to goods and services less than $10,000, do not require competitive quotes but does require attempts at equitable distribution to avoid all purchases from the same vendor. ? Small purchases, which apply to goods and services directly charged to federal awards that are more than $10,000 but below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), require multiple rate quotes from qualified sources. ? Sealed bids when services are above the $250,000 level and which are most applicable for construction. ? Competitive proposals to be used when sealed bids are not practical. There are 5 standards that an organization must comply with regardless of which procurement method is used: ? Written procedures, ? Expenses must be necessary and reasonable, ? Subject to open competition, ? Code of conduct and conflict of interest policies must be adhered to, and ? Contain proper documentation including the detail of the purchase transaction, support of the procurement method used and the basis of the award and price. Citation: 2 CFR 200.320 Condition: The Organization?s procurement policy did not contain the criteria outlined in the regulation. Cause: The Organization did not update the procurement policy to be in line with the new requirements under Uniform Guidance. Effect: There is a risk that purchases will be made that do not contain the proper bids or be documented in a manner that is consistent with federal guidelines. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The policy did not contain all the criteria for procurement thresholds above the micro purchase level. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management make changes to the current policy to be consistent with the federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2019-001 ? Procurement Agency: MHP Salud Responsible Official: Brynna Burguard, Chief Allocation and Resources Officer Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/2020 Agency?s Response: Concur MHP Salud agrees with this finding and will implement the following: ? Modify the Purchasing and Procurement policy within the MHP Salud Finance Manual to align with all federal requirements ? Develop a Procurement Pre-Authorization Procedure to accompany the Purchasing and Procurement policy outlined in the MHP Salud Finance Manual and support the proactive monitoring of adherence to all procurement guidelines before purchases are made ? Distribute the updated policy and new procedure ? Provide training on the updated policy and new procedure

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,412,033 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2019 — management decision was due February 21, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

$2,503,413 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 6, 2018 — management decision was due March 6, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

$1,488,877 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2017 — management decision was due November 14, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.