← Back to home

SHAWL II SENIOR HOUSING OF MONTAGUENon-Profit

EIN: 382931825

UEI: ZWMKLLNNVLA3

Audited by: MANER COSTERISAN

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

SHAWL II SENIOR HOUSING OF MONTAGUE11 audit years2 findings
11
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,045,565 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 15, 2026 (73 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Based on the prior year surplus cash computation, the Project was required to deposit $10,582 to the residual receipts account. As of December 31, 2025, this required deposit had not been made to the residual receipts account. Criteria: Per the Regulatory Agreement and HUD requirements, surplus cash remaining after allowable distributions must be deposited into the residual receipts account. Residual receipts deposits are required to be made in the amount determined by the surplus cash calculation and must be maintained in the residual receipts account for project purposes in accordance with HUD regulations. Effect: Failure to deposit the required amount into the residual receipts account resulted in noncompliance with HUD requirements related to the proper handling and restriction of project funds. Cause: The required residual receipts deposit was not made because management did not properly identify the amount due from the prior year surplus cash calculation and did not complete the required transfer to the residual receipts account. Questioned Costs: $10,582, representing the required residual receipts deposit that had not been made as of December 31, 2025. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to review the surplus cash computation each year and ensure that all required residual receipts deposits are made timely in accordance with HUD requirements. Management Comments: We agree with the facts and circumstances described above. Subsequent to year end, the Project deposited the required amount of $10,582 to the residual receipts account, and the account is now in compliance with HUD requirements. Management has implemented procedures to review the surplus cash computation annually and ensure that all required residual receipts deposits are made on a timely basis going forward. Auditor Noncompliance Code: B – Failure to make required residual receipts deposits

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-001 -Considered to be immaterial noncompliance Condition: Based on the prior year surplus cash computation, the Project was required to deposit $10,582 to the residual receipts account. As of December 31, 2025, this required deposit had not been made to the residual receipts account. Criteria: Per the Regulatory Agreement and HUD requirements, surplus cash remaining after allowable distributions must be deposited into the residual receipts account. Residual receipts deposits are required to be made in the amount determined by the surplus cash calculation and must be maintained in the residual receipts account for project purposes in accordance with HUD regulations. Effect: Failure to deposit the required amount into the residual receipts account resulted in noncompliance with HUD requirements related to the proper handling and restriction of project funds. Cause: The required residual receipts deposit was not made because management did not properly identify the amount due from the prior year surplus cash calculation and did not complete the required transfer to the residual receipts account. Questioned Costs: $10,582, representing the required residual receipts deposit that had not been made as of December 31, 2025. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to review the surplus cash computation each year and ensure that all required residual receipts deposits are made timely in accordance with HUD requirements. Management Comments: We agree with the facts and circumstances described above. Subsequent to year end, the Project deposited the required amount of $10,582 to the residual receipts account, and the account is now in compliance with HUD requirements. Management has implemented procedures to review the surplus cash computation annually and ensure that all required residual receipts deposits are made on a timely basis going forward. Auditor Noncompliance Code: B – Failure to make required residual receipts deposits

Corrective Action Plan

Shawl II, Senior Housing of Montague, respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December31, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Maner Costerisan, P.C. 2425 E. Grand River Ave, Ste 1 Lansing, MI 48912 Audit period: January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 The findings from the December 31, 2025 schedule of findings, questioned costs, and recommendations are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. Findings - Considered to be immaterial noncompliance Finding 2025-001 Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to review the residual receipt account on a regular basis and ensure that residual receipt deposits are in accordance with HUD requirements. Management Comments: We agree with the facts and circumstances described above. Subsequent to year end, the Organization funded the residual receipt account for the amount of the deficiency of $10,582, and the account is now fully funded in accordance with HUD requirements. No underfunding existed as of the report date. Management has implemented procedures to make sure required residual receipt deposits from surplus cash are made to ensure ongoing compliance with HUD requirements.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,075,202 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2025 — management decision was due December 21, 2025.

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,075,202 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 10, 2025 — management decision was due January 10, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,104,882 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 9, 2024 — management decision was due November 9, 2024.

2023-001
Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Organization overpaid management fees by $250 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Questioned costs: $250 Cause: Organization did not adjust the HUD-prescribed percentage of rental and other receipts used to calculate management fees after increasing rent rates during 2023. Effect: Management fees were overpaid for the year ended December 31, 2023. Recommendation: The HUD-prescribed percentage of rental and other receipts used to calculate management fees should be adjusted after changes to rent rates to ensure that the management fees charged are under the per-unit-per-month amount outlines in the management agent certification. Management Comments: We agree with the facts and circumstances of this finding and will pay back the 250 dollars that is owed back to the organization. Auditor Noncompliance Code: J – Unauthorized management fees

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-001- Considered a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Federal Program: Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Multifamily Housing Projects ALN #: 14.155 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Criteria: Organization management is responsible for ensuring the management fees are paid in accordance with the HUD approved management certification. Condition: The Organization overpaid management fees by $250 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Questioned costs: $250 Cause: Organization did not adjust the HUD-prescribed percentage of rental and other receipts used to calculate management fees after increasing rent rates during 2023. Effect: Management fees were overpaid for the year ended December 31, 2023. Recommendation: The HUD-prescribed percentage of rental and other receipts used to calculate management fees should be adjusted after changes to rent rates to ensure that the management fees charged are under the per-unit-per-month amount outlines in the management agent certification. Management Comments: We agree with the facts and circumstances of this finding and will pay back the 250 dollars that is owed back to the organization. Auditor Noncompliance Code: J – Unauthorized management fees

Corrective Action Plan

March 22, 2024 Corrective Action Plan SHAWL II, Senior Housing of Montague Finding: 2023-001 Condition: The Organization overpaid management fees by $250 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Regarding finding 2023-001 we will pay back the $250 that is owed to the organization in 2024. Moving forward we will make sure that the HUD-prescribed percentage of rental and other receipts used to calculate management fees are adjusted after changes to rent rates to ensure that the management fees charged are under the per-unit-per-month amount outlines in the management agent certification. Alex Valean, CPA Finance Supervisor, Affordable Living 40

About Program Income →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,147,073 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2023 — management decision was due September 28, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,177,864 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2022 — management decision was due October 1, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,196,827 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2021 — management decision was due October 20, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,220,106 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 21, 2020 — management decision was due October 21, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,220,954 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 25, 2019 — management decision was due October 25, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,238,936 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,253,175 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2017 — management decision was due October 16, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.