EIN: 382117978
UEI: NF3RTRFCF393
Audited by: Plante & Moran, PLLC
Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 10, 2026 (12 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2025 — management decision was due August 28, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2024 — management decision was due August 22, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on April 11, 2023 — management decision was due October 11, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2022 — management decision was due September 17, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2021 — management decision was due August 8, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2020 — management decision was due September 9, 2020.
FEDERAL AWARD AUDIT FINDING Reference Number Finding 2019-001 CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: 20.509, Department of Transportation, Formula Grants for Rural Areas Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2017-0008/P10 Pass Through Entity ? Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type ? Significant Deficiency and noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria ? Per 2 CFR ? 200.331 all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: Federal Award Identification such as: a) Subrecipient name (which must match registered name in DUNS), b) Subrecipient?s DUNS number, c) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), d) Federal Award date, e) Subaward period of performance start and end date, f) Amount of Federal funds obligated by this action, g) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient, h) Total amount of the Federal award, i) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), j) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official, k) CFDA number and name, the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement, l) Identification of whether the award is R&D, and m) Direct cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged). Condition ? The Authority did not identify the required federal award information in the subaward agreement/contracts. Questioned Costs ? None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed ? Not applicable, as there are no questioned costs. Context ? The Authority executed agreements with two subrecipients. During testing performed, it was noted that the subaward agreements/contracts did not include the required Federal Award Identification information such as: a) Federal Award date, b) Total amount of the Federal award, c) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), d) CFDA number and name, the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement, e) Identification of whether the award is R&D, and f) Direct cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged). Cause and Effect ? A review of the subaward agreement/contracts was not performed; therefore, the Authority did not comply with the sub-recipient monitoring requirements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FEDERAL AWARD AUDIT FINDING Reference Number Finding 2019-001 CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: 20.509, Department of Transportation, Formula Grants for Rural Areas Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2017-0008/P10 Pass Through Entity ? Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type ? Significant Deficiency and noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria ? Per 2 CFR ? 200.331 all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: Federal Award Identification such as: a) Subrecipient name (which must match registered name in DUNS), b) Subrecipient?s DUNS number, c) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), d) Federal Award date, e) Subaward period of performance start and end date, f) Amount of Federal funds obligated by this action, g) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient, h) Total amount of the Federal award, i) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), j) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official, k) CFDA number and name, the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement, l) Identification of whether the award is R&D, and m) Direct cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged). Condition ? The Authority did not identify the required federal award information in the subaward agreement/contracts. Questioned Costs ? None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed ? Not applicable, as there are no questioned costs. Context ? The Authority executed agreements with two subrecipients. During testing performed, it was noted that the subaward agreements/contracts did not include the required Federal Award Identification information such as: a) Federal Award date, b) Total amount of the Federal award, c) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), d) CFDA number and name, the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement, e) Identification of whether the award is R&D, and f) Direct cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged). Cause and Effect ? A review of the subaward agreement/contracts was not performed; therefore, the Authority did not comply with the sub-recipient monitoring requirements.
January 28, 2020 FEDERAL AUDIT CLEARINGHOUSE RE: Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR ENDED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 RE: CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) Federal Award Finding Number: 2019-001 Condition: The Authority did not identify the required federal award information in the subaward agreement/contracts. Planned Corrective Action: The above finding was noted in the Authority?s recent 2018 FTA (Federal Transit Administration) Triennial Review as well. This deficiency was addressed as part of the FTA Correction Action Plan as of February 1, 2019. The Finance department updated the subrecipient agreement template and began using the new template for all new subrecipient agreements. The selected agreements for the 2019 Single Audit were executed prior to the control remediation and therefore were missing the key elements. However, management views this deficiency to be resolved based on the correction actions already taken. Completion Date: February 2019 Point of Contact: LaTasha Thompson, Controller Sincerely, John Metzinger Deputy CEO, Finance and Administration
FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2019 — management decision was due August 26, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2018 — management decision was due August 20, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2017 — management decision was due September 2, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
