← Back to home

WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES, INCNon-Profit

EIN: 381918221

UEI: CAX5MKW6LNC4

Audited by: Hungerford

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES, INC5 audit years2 findings
5
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2026)

FY 2026-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,136,411 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 14, 2027 (167 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2025-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,707,501 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 8, 2025 — management decision was due February 8, 2026.

FY 2024-03-31

$2,128,418 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2024 — management decision was due February 19, 2025.

FY 2023-03-31

$1,737,325 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2023 — management decision was due June 8, 2024.

FY 2019-03-31

$898,244 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 17, 2019 — management decision was due March 17, 2020.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Organization has not developed written procedures that are consistent with requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization has not dedicated the resources necessary to document written procedures that are in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Control activities of the Organization were in some cases ineffective or nonexistent, thereby increasing the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards administered. Questioned Costs: $0 for all programs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization compile and adhere to Federal Written Procedures that support an effective control environment and provide reasonable assurance that the Organization is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and has compiled Federal Written Procedures prior to the date of this report. Procedures implemented will be adhered to by staff involved with grants management. Criteria: Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303, requires that the Organization establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization has not developed written procedures that are consistent with requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization has not dedicated the resources necessary to document written procedures that are in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Control activities of the Organization were in some cases ineffective or nonexistent, thereby increasing the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards administered. Questioned Costs: $0 for all programs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization compile and adhere to Federal Written Procedures that support an effective control environment and provide reasonable assurance that the Organization is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and has compiled Federal Written Procedures prior to the date of this report. Procedures implemented will be adhered to by staff involved with grants management.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303, requires that the Organization establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization has not developed written procedures that are consistent with requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization has not dedicated the resources necessary to document written procedures that are in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Control activities of the Organization were in some cases ineffective or nonexistent, thereby increasing the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards administered. Questioned Costs: $0 for all programs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization compile and adhere to Federal Written Procedures that support an effective control environment and provide reasonable assurance that the Organization is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and has compiled Federal Written Procedures prior to the date of this report. Procedures implemented will be adhered to by staff involved with grants management. Criteria: Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303, requires that the Organization establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization has not developed written procedures that are consistent with requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization has not dedicated the resources necessary to document written procedures that are in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Control activities of the Organization were in some cases ineffective or nonexistent, thereby increasing the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards administered. Questioned Costs: $0 for all programs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization compile and adhere to Federal Written Procedures that support an effective control environment and provide reasonable assurance that the Organization is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and has compiled Federal Written Procedures prior to the date of this report. Procedures implemented will be adhered to by staff involved with grants management.

Corrective Action Plan

See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table

About Other →
2019-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Meals served, as reported on the monthly Claim for Reimbursement, did not reconcile to daily meal count checklists prepared at the point of service. We reviewed 2 of 12 monthly Claim for Reimbursements during the audit period, and noted a discrepancy between meals served and totals per the daily meal count checklists for both months. Furthermore, we noted that meal counts on one day had been included in Claim for Reimbursements in consecutive months. Cause: The Organization?s process for recording, monitoring, and reporting meals served is performed entirely by staff without assistance of point of sale technology, and is therefore subject to human error. Effect: Reporting of meals served on the monthly Claim for Reimbursement, for the periods tested, were not an accurate reflection of actual meals served. In total for the audit period, meals served were under-reported on monthly Claim for Reimbursements. Questioned Costs: $0 for all programs. Recommendation: The Organization should establish and implement effective internal controls that would identify and correct meal count errors prior to submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and is in the process of implementing controls to ensure the accuracy of monthly Claims for Reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per 7 CFR 210.8, a school food authority shall establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of lunch counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. These internal controls shall include, at a minimum, comparisons of daily free, reduced price and paid meal counts against data which will assist in the identification of meal counts in excess of the number of free, reduced price and paid meals served each day to children eligible for such meals; and a system for following up on those meal counts which suggest the likelihood of meal counting problems. Furthermore, prior to the submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure its accuracy. Condition: Meals served, as reported on the monthly Claim for Reimbursement, did not reconcile to daily meal count checklists prepared at the point of service. We reviewed 2 of 12 monthly Claim for Reimbursements during the audit period, and noted a discrepancy between meals served and totals per the daily meal count checklists for both months. Furthermore, we noted that meal counts on one day had been included in Claim for Reimbursements in consecutive months. Cause: The Organization?s process for recording, monitoring, and reporting meals served is performed entirely by staff without assistance of point of sale technology, and is therefore subject to human error. Effect: Reporting of meals served on the monthly Claim for Reimbursement, for the periods tested, were not an accurate reflection of actual meals served. In total for the audit period, meals served were under-reported on monthly Claim for Reimbursements. Questioned Costs: $0 for all programs. Recommendation: The Organization should establish and implement effective internal controls that would identify and correct meal count errors prior to submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and is in the process of implementing controls to ensure the accuracy of monthly Claims for Reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.