EIN: 381848425
UEI: VGJQHZLHCD58
Audited by: Siegfried Crandall PC
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 2, 2027 (174 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2024 — management decision was due February 28, 2025.
A formal written policy covering allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement has not been updated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: This condition appears to be the result of a time lag in identifying the requirement and developing a plan for compliance. Effect: The lack of written policies could result in costs or transactions that would be nonallowable for a federal program. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, adopt written policies, as required by Uniform Guidance, for allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. However, corrective action will be done whereby the written policies will be prepared and adopted for the future.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Program Title: Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: October 2021 to September 30, 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Michigan Department of Transportation Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded to have written policies pertaining to allowability of costs, payments, and compensation charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)). Condition: A formal written policy covering allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement has not been updated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: This condition appears to be the result of a time lag in identifying the requirement and developing a plan for compliance. Effect: The lack of written policies could result in costs or transactions that would be nonallowable for a federal program. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, adopt written policies, as required by Uniform Guidance, for allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. However, corrective action will be done whereby the written policies will be prepared and adopted for the future.
This finding is due to the Village not having formal written policies in place required by Uniform Guidance. The Village is now aware that these policies are required and will adopt all necessary policies. The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. The Village will adopt all necessary policies to be in compliance. The person responsible for the corrective action is the Village President. The anticipated completion date of the corrective action plan is before the end of the 2025 fiscal year. The plan for adherence is the Council will review all proposed policies and adopt them, the Council will also monitor any changes to policy requirements to ensure that they are in compliance in the future.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
