← Back to home

DETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIESNon-Profit

EIN: 381459371

UEI: DCT1MCBLYLA1

Audit also covers EIN: 382269638 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CapinCrouse LLC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

DETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES10 audit years6 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$4.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$4,739,492 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 1, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 1, 2026 (86 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

$6,242,649 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 14, 2025 — management decision was due April 14, 2026.

2024-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-001

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Untimely Closing of Books Criteria – According to best practices in financial reporting and accounting standards, including GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), financial records should be closed promptly—typically within 30 to 45 days after the end of the reporting period. Timely closing ensures accurate, complete, and relevant financial information is available for decision-making and reporting to stakeholders. Condition—The organization failed to close its books within the timeframe for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023. Several accounts were not adequately reconciled from prior years, which delayed the finalized financial statements 10 months past the deadline. Cause—The delays were due to insufficient staffing, a change in accounting leadership, inadequate closing procedures, and delays in information such as the 211 Glendale Promissory Information. Effect – The untimely closing process resulted in inaccurate interim financial reports shared with the board and increased audit risk, as late adjustments and reconciliations may compromise the reliability of financial data. Recommendation—We recommend developing and implementing a financial close calendar, automating key processes, hiring and training additional staff, and conducting monthly close reviews.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Untimely Closing of Books Criteria – According to best practices in financial reporting and accounting standards, including GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), financial records should be closed promptly—typically within 30 to 45 days after the end of the reporting period. Timely closing ensures accurate, complete, and relevant financial information is available for decision-making and reporting to stakeholders. Condition—The organization failed to close its books within the timeframe for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023. Several accounts were not adequately reconciled from prior years, which delayed the finalized financial statements 10 months past the deadline. Cause—The delays were due to insufficient staffing, a change in accounting leadership, inadequate closing procedures, and delays in information such as the 211 Glendale Promissory Information. Effect – The untimely closing process resulted in inaccurate interim financial reports shared with the board and increased audit risk, as late adjustments and reconciliations may compromise the reliability of financial data. Recommendation—We recommend developing and implementing a financial close calendar, automating key processes, hiring and training additional staff, and conducting monthly close reviews.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will ensure that the books are closed within 45 days of the end of each reporting period. To support this timeframe, we have put a dedicated team in place. Additionally, a month-end checklist has been established to confirm that all tasks are completed on schedule.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Other →
2024-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-002

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Multiple Adjustments to Financial Statements Criteria – Effective internal controls require that financial transactions and accounts be accurately recorded and reported in the general ledger. According to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and sound financial management practices, adjustments should be minimal if proper controls, reconciliations, and review procedures are in place throughout the reporting period. Condition—During the audit, multiple material adjustments were required to correct errors in the financial statements. These adjustments included corrections to various balance sheet accounts, grant revenue, and recognizing unrecorded notes payable discovered by management in September 2024. Cause – The root cause of these multiple adjustments appears to be inadequate internal controls over financial reporting. Effect – The multiple adjustments indicate that the financial statements initially presented were unreliable, increasing the risk of material misstatements. This undermines the users' confidence in the organization’s financial reports and could lead to adverse consequences, including loss of donor trust, regulatory noncompliance, or financial penalties. Recommendation—We recommend that management implement enhanced controls over financial reporting to minimize the need for multiple adjustments. Routine monthly recognition of key accounts should detect discrepancies early. A formal review and approval process of journal entries and adjustments should also be implemented, and accounting personnel should be trained to strengthen their knowledge in complex financial reporting areas.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Multiple Adjustments to Financial Statements Criteria – Effective internal controls require that financial transactions and accounts be accurately recorded and reported in the general ledger. According to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and sound financial management practices, adjustments should be minimal if proper controls, reconciliations, and review procedures are in place throughout the reporting period. Condition—During the audit, multiple material adjustments were required to correct errors in the financial statements. These adjustments included corrections to various balance sheet accounts, grant revenue, and recognizing unrecorded notes payable discovered by management in September 2024. Cause – The root cause of these multiple adjustments appears to be inadequate internal controls over financial reporting. Effect – The multiple adjustments indicate that the financial statements initially presented were unreliable, increasing the risk of material misstatements. This undermines the users' confidence in the organization’s financial reports and could lead to adverse consequences, including loss of donor trust, regulatory noncompliance, or financial penalties. Recommendation—We recommend that management implement enhanced controls over financial reporting to minimize the need for multiple adjustments. Routine monthly recognition of key accounts should detect discrepancies early. A formal review and approval process of journal entries and adjustments should also be implemented, and accounting personnel should be trained to strengthen their knowledge in complex financial reporting areas.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has implemented enhanced review processes to ensure accuracy in key accounts and prevent discrepancies. A formal review procedure is now in place to examine journal entries before they are posted.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Other →

FY 2023-09-30

$6,060,547 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 14, 2025 — management decision was due April 14, 2026.

2023-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Criteria – According to best practices in financial reporting and accounting standards, including GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), financial records should be closed promptly—typically within 30 to 45 days after the end of the reporting period. Timely closing ensures accurate, complete, and relevant financial information is available for decision-making and reporting to stakeholders. Condition—The organization failed to close its books within the timeframe for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023. Several accounts were not adequately reconciled from prior years, which delayed the finalized financial statements 10 months past the deadline. Cause—The delays were due to insufficient staffing, a change in accounting leadership, inadequate closing procedures, and delays in information such as the 211 Glendale Promissory Information. Effect – The untimely closing process resulted in inaccurate interim financial reports shared with the board and increased audit risk, as late adjustments and reconciliations may compromise the reliability of financial data. Recommendation—We recommend developing and implementing a financial close calendar, automating key processes, hiring and training additional staff, and conducting monthly close reviews.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria – According to best practices in financial reporting and accounting standards, including GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), financial records should be closed promptly—typically within 30 to 45 days after the end of the reporting period. Timely closing ensures accurate, complete, and relevant financial information is available for decision-making and reporting to stakeholders. Condition—The organization failed to close its books within the timeframe for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023. Several accounts were not adequately reconciled from prior years, which delayed the finalized financial statements 10 months past the deadline. Cause—The delays were due to insufficient staffing, a change in accounting leadership, inadequate closing procedures, and delays in information such as the 211 Glendale Promissory Information. Effect – The untimely closing process resulted in inaccurate interim financial reports shared with the board and increased audit risk, as late adjustments and reconciliations may compromise the reliability of financial data. Recommendation—We recommend developing and implementing a financial close calendar, automating key processes, hiring and training additional staff, and conducting monthly close reviews.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will ensure that the books are closed within 45 days of the end of each reporting period. To support this timeframe, we have put a dedicated team in place. Additionally, a month-end checklist has been established to confirm that all tasks are completed on schedule.

About Reporting →
2023-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Criteria – Effective internal controls require that financial transactions and accounts be accurately recorded and reported in the general ledger. According to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and sound financial management practices, adjustments should be minimal if proper controls, reconciliations, and review procedures are in place throughout the reporting period. Condition—During the audit, multiple material adjustments were required to correct errors in the financial statements. These adjustments included corrections to various balance sheet accounts, grant revenue, and recognizing unrecorded notes payable discovered by management in September 2024. Cause – The root cause of these multiple adjustments appears to be inadequate internal controls over financial reporting Effect – The multiple adjustments indicate that the financial statements initially presented were unreliable, increasing the risk of material misstatements. This undermines the users' confidence in the organization’s financial reports and could lead to adverse consequences, including loss of donor trust, regulatory noncompliance, or financial penalties. Recommendation—We recommend that management implement enhanced controls over financial reporting to minimize the need for multiple adjustments. Routine monthly recognition of key accounts should detect discrepancies early. A formal review and approval process of journal entries and adjustments should also be implemented, and accounting personnel should be trained to strengthen their knowledge in complex financial reporting areas.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria – Effective internal controls require that financial transactions and accounts be accurately recorded and reported in the general ledger. According to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and sound financial management practices, adjustments should be minimal if proper controls, reconciliations, and review procedures are in place throughout the reporting period. Condition—During the audit, multiple material adjustments were required to correct errors in the financial statements. These adjustments included corrections to various balance sheet accounts, grant revenue, and recognizing unrecorded notes payable discovered by management in September 2024. Cause – The root cause of these multiple adjustments appears to be inadequate internal controls over financial reporting Effect – The multiple adjustments indicate that the financial statements initially presented were unreliable, increasing the risk of material misstatements. This undermines the users' confidence in the organization’s financial reports and could lead to adverse consequences, including loss of donor trust, regulatory noncompliance, or financial penalties. Recommendation—We recommend that management implement enhanced controls over financial reporting to minimize the need for multiple adjustments. Routine monthly recognition of key accounts should detect discrepancies early. A formal review and approval process of journal entries and adjustments should also be implemented, and accounting personnel should be trained to strengthen their knowledge in complex financial reporting areas.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has implemented enhanced review processes to ensure accuracy in key accounts and prevent discrepancies. A formal review procedure is now in place to examine journal entries before they are posted.

About Reporting →

FY 2022-09-30

$5,850,895 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2023 — management decision was due December 29, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

$4,058,798 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 3, 2022 — management decision was due October 3, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

$4,009,932 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

$4,031,556 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2020 — management decision was due March 16, 2021.

2019-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Significant Deficiency - Procurement Program Information ? Continuum of Care (CoC), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CFDA #14.267 Criteria ? Management is responsible for complying with 2CFR200?s procurement requirements. Condition ? We noted 5 of 40 transactions that, based on Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries and Lakeview Farms Mission?s policies, could have been quoted or bid before selecting a winning bidder. Documentation of the bid and decision to select those winners was not maintained or provided. Questioned Costs ? None Cause ? This condition was the result of oversights in the procedures designed to ensure the procurement process is appropriate for goods or services obtained. Effect ? The affect is unknown. Recommendation ? We recommend Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries and Lakeview Farms Mission implement and document procedures to ensure the appropriate level of procurement occurs. Consideration should be given to updating the policies and procedures manuals to specify monetary thresholds and specific services and goods that should be procured via quote or sealed bid. The selection of the winning bid should be documented if not the lowest bidder and any inability for an appropriate procurement process to occur should also be documented. View of Responsible Officials ? Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries and Lakeview Farms Mission will endeavor to update procurement policies and procedures and document the results of any procurements. Corrective Action Plan ? See attached corrective action plan from management.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant Deficiency - Procurement Program Information ? Continuum of Care (CoC), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CFDA #14.267 Criteria ? Management is responsible for complying with 2CFR200?s procurement requirements. Condition ? We noted 5 of 40 transactions that, based on Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries and Lakeview Farms Mission?s policies, could have been quoted or bid before selecting a winning bidder. Documentation of the bid and decision to select those winners was not maintained or provided. Questioned Costs ? None Cause ? This condition was the result of oversights in the procedures designed to ensure the procurement process is appropriate for goods or services obtained. Effect ? The affect is unknown. Recommendation ? We recommend Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries and Lakeview Farms Mission implement and document procedures to ensure the appropriate level of procurement occurs. Consideration should be given to updating the policies and procedures manuals to specify monetary thresholds and specific services and goods that should be procured via quote or sealed bid. The selection of the winning bid should be documented if not the lowest bidder and any inability for an appropriate procurement process to occur should also be documented. View of Responsible Officials ? Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries and Lakeview Farms Mission will endeavor to update procurement policies and procedures and document the results of any procurements. Corrective Action Plan ? See attached corrective action plan from management.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-003 Suitable Procurement Practices DRMM has updated current procurement policies, including thresholds and services requiring competitive bids and will document bid processes and outcomes more closely going forward.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,685,917 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2019 — management decision was due December 27, 2019.

2018-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2017-09-30

$4,757,480 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 10, 2018 — management decision was due December 10, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

$6,603,547 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2017 — management decision was due December 29, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.