← Back to home

United Way of South Central MichiganNon-Profit

EIN: 381359193

UEI: LB2MPMC4BQS4

Audited by: Rehmann Robson LLC

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

United Way of South Central Michigan2 audit years6 findings2 repeat
2
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-03-31

$1,680,732 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 10, 2026 (81 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-004OTHER MATTERS

Lack of Independent Review and Approval of Reporting Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Reporting). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. Recipients of federal awards are required to report periodically on financial information, as specified by the 2 CFR 200 Compliance Supplement or grant agreement. Reported information should be supported by the entity’s accounting records and subjected to an independent review and approval prior to submission in order to detect and correct any errors or omissions. Condition. The Organization is required to submit quarterly reports on the grant expenditures, and we noted that these reports are not subjected to an independent review and approval process. Cause. This condition was caused by the lack of understanding by program staff of the specific requirements of reporting. Effect. The Organization was exposed to an increased risk that the reports filed could contain errors and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its procedures for compiling financial data for external reporting purposes and develop an independent review process before report submission. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of Independent Review and Approval of Reporting Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Reporting). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. Recipients of federal awards are required to report periodically on financial information, as specified by the 2 CFR 200 Compliance Supplement or grant agreement. Reported information should be supported by the entity’s accounting records and subjected to an independent review and approval prior to submission in order to detect and correct any errors or omissions. Condition. The Organization is required to submit quarterly reports on the grant expenditures, and we noted that these reports are not subjected to an independent review and approval process. Cause. This condition was caused by the lack of understanding by program staff of the specific requirements of reporting. Effect. The Organization was exposed to an increased risk that the reports filed could contain errors and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its procedures for compiling financial data for external reporting purposes and develop an independent review process before report submission. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

This was a finding last year. Audit findings were issued in December 2024. There was not time to implement a review process for 2025. Management has agreed upon and developed a review process. Management will implement a formal process requiring an independent review of all federal quarterly grant expenditure reports before submission. The designated reviewer will be a senior staff member or an individual independent of the preparation and approval process. This person will have sufficient expertise in grant management and financial reporting. The reviewer will carefully verify the accuracy of the data, confirm that all expenditures are correctly categorized, ensure compliance with grant terms, and validate calculations.

Prior Finding References

2024-004

About Reporting →
2025-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-005OTHER MATTERS

Failure to Implement Required Written Policies Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Cash Management and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to various areas, including: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302 (6)); 2) Procurement (including bidding and a conflict of interest policy) (§200.318); 3) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302 (7)); 4) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431); and 5) Travel costs (including mileage and per diem) (§200.474). Condition. There are no written policies in place covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs charged to federal programs, compensation, or travel costs. Cause. This condition appears to have been caused by a lack of knowledge of applicable federal compliance requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Organization did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that written policies be put in place for all required processes to comply with requirements. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Failure to Implement Required Written Policies Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Cash Management and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to various areas, including: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302 (6)); 2) Procurement (including bidding and a conflict of interest policy) (§200.318); 3) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302 (7)); 4) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431); and 5) Travel costs (including mileage and per diem) (§200.474). Condition. There are no written policies in place covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs charged to federal programs, compensation, or travel costs. Cause. This condition appears to have been caused by a lack of knowledge of applicable federal compliance requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Organization did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that written policies be put in place for all required processes to comply with requirements. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Management developed and formalized written policies covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs, compensation, and travel costs. These policies clearly outline procedures and approval processes to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. They address key areas such as payment processing, procurement protocols, criteria for allowable costs on federal programs, compensation guidelines, and travel reimbursement rules, ensuring consistency and adherence to federal regulations.

Prior Finding References

2024-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management →

FY 2024-03-31

$2,285,852 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2024 — management decision was due June 23, 2025.

2024-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2024-003 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Procurement, Suspension and Debarment). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition. There is no procedure in place to determine whether vendors are suspended or debarred. Cause. The Organization did not have a procedure in place to require documentation be maintained that the search for suspension and department associated with procurement transactions in excess of the $25,000 threshold had been performed prior to procurement. Effect. Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as none of the vendors or subrecipients involved were actually suspended or debarred. Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its policies over suspension and debarment review to ensure they are maintaining compliance and controls over verifying or contracting with vendors that are allowable. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-003 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Procurement, Suspension and Debarment). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition. There is no procedure in place to determine whether vendors are suspended or debarred. Cause. The Organization did not have a procedure in place to require documentation be maintained that the search for suspension and department associated with procurement transactions in excess of the $25,000 threshold had been performed prior to procurement. Effect. Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as none of the vendors or subrecipients involved were actually suspended or debarred. Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its policies over suspension and debarment review to ensure they are maintaining compliance and controls over verifying or contracting with vendors that are allowable. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our single audit testing, it was determined that there was no process in place to verify that vendors with transactions in excess of $25,000 were not suspended or debarred. Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its policies over suspension and debarment review to ensure that they are contracting with allowable vendors. Corrective Action. For Federal grants, management will implement a system for verifying that all vendors or subrecipients with transactions exceeding $25,000 are not suspended or debarred by the federal government, ensuring full compliance with federal regulations and minimizing the risk of using prohibited vendors. A mandatory check against the System for Award Management (SAM) database for suspension and debarment status will occur, with a printout or screenshot of the results maintained. Responsible Person. Chris Sargent, President & Executive Officer Anticipated Completion Date. January 31, 2025

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2024-004
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2024-004 – Lack of Independent Review and Approval of Reporting Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Reporting). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. Recipients of federal awards are required to report periodically on financial information, as specified by the 2 CFR 200 Compliance Supplement or grant agreement. Reported information should be supported by the entity’s accounting records and subjected to an independent review and approval prior to submission in order to detect and correct any errors or omissions. Condition. The Organization is required to submit quarterly reports on the grant expenditures, and we noted that these reports are not subjected to an independent review and approval process. Cause. This condition was caused by the lack of understanding by program staff of the specific requirements of reporting. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Organization did not comply fully with the reporting requirements under this federal award. In addition, the Organization was exposed to an increased risk that the reports filed could contain errors and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its procedures for compiling financial data for external reporting purposes and develop an independent review process before report submission. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-004 – Lack of Independent Review and Approval of Reporting Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Reporting). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. Recipients of federal awards are required to report periodically on financial information, as specified by the 2 CFR 200 Compliance Supplement or grant agreement. Reported information should be supported by the entity’s accounting records and subjected to an independent review and approval prior to submission in order to detect and correct any errors or omissions. Condition. The Organization is required to submit quarterly reports on the grant expenditures, and we noted that these reports are not subjected to an independent review and approval process. Cause. This condition was caused by the lack of understanding by program staff of the specific requirements of reporting. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Organization did not comply fully with the reporting requirements under this federal award. In addition, the Organization was exposed to an increased risk that the reports filed could contain errors and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its procedures for compiling financial data for external reporting purposes and develop an independent review process before report submission. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our testing we noted that there was not an independent review performed on quarterly grant expenditure reports before submission. This can cause an increased risk that reports filed could contain errors and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization review its procedures for compiling financial data for external reporting purposes and develop an independent review process before report submission. Corrective Action. Management will implement a formal process requiring an independent review of all federal quarterly grant expenditure reports before submission. The designated reviewer will be a senior staff member or an individual independent of the preparation and approval process. This person will have sufficient expertise in grant management and financial reporting. The reviewer will carefully verify the accuracy of the data, confirm that all expenditures are correctly categorized, ensure compliance with grant terms, and validate calculations. Responsible Person. Chris Sargent, President & Executive Officer Anticipated Completion Date. January 31, 2025

About Reporting →
2024-005
Cost Allowability / Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2024-005 – Failure to Implement Required Written Policies Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Cash Management and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to various areas, including: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302 (6)); 2) Procurement (including bidding and a conflict of interest policy) (§200.318); 3) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302 (7)); 4) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431); and 5) Travel costs (including mileage and per diem) (§200.474). Condition. There are no written policies in place covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs charged to federal programs, compensation, or travel costs. Cause. This condition appears to have been caused by a lack of knowledge of applicable federal compliance requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Organization did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that written policies be put in place for all required processes to comply with requirements. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-005 – Failure to Implement Required Written Policies Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Cash Management and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to various areas, including: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302 (6)); 2) Procurement (including bidding and a conflict of interest policy) (§200.318); 3) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302 (7)); 4) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431); and 5) Travel costs (including mileage and per diem) (§200.474). Condition. There are no written policies in place covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs charged to federal programs, compensation, or travel costs. Cause. This condition appears to have been caused by a lack of knowledge of applicable federal compliance requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Organization did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that written policies be put in place for all required processes to comply with requirements. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. There are no written policies in place covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs charged to federal programs, compensation, or travel costs, leading to noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that written policies be put in place for all required processes to comply with requirements. Corrective Action. Management will develop and formalize written policies covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs, compensation, and travel costs. These policies will clearly outline procedures and approval processes to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. They will address key areas such as payment processing, procurement protocols, criteria for allowable costs on federal programs, compensation guidelines, and travel reimbursement rules, ensuring consistency and adherence to federal regulations. Responsible Person. Chris Sargent, President & Executive Officer Anticipated Completion Date. March 31, 2025

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management →
2024-006
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2024-006– Lack of Independent Review and Approval of Journal Entries in Federal Grant Programs Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Activities). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. According to 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition. The Organization does not have a formal review process in place for journal entries related to its federal grant programs. Journal entries are posted without independent review or approval, increasing the risk of errors or misstatements in the financial records. Cause. The lack of a review process is due to insufficient staffing and inadequate segregation of duties within the accounting department. Effect. Without a review process, there is an increased risk of inaccurate financial reporting and potential non-compliance with federal regulations. This could lead to questioned costs, audit findings, and potential loss of federal funding. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, in as much as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. The Organization should implement a formal review and approval process for all journal entries related to federal grant programs. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-006– Lack of Independent Review and Approval of Journal Entries in Federal Grant Programs Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Activities). Program. COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027, All Award Numbers Criteria. According to 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition. The Organization does not have a formal review process in place for journal entries related to its federal grant programs. Journal entries are posted without independent review or approval, increasing the risk of errors or misstatements in the financial records. Cause. The lack of a review process is due to insufficient staffing and inadequate segregation of duties within the accounting department. Effect. Without a review process, there is an increased risk of inaccurate financial reporting and potential non-compliance with federal regulations. This could lead to questioned costs, audit findings, and potential loss of federal funding. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, in as much as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. The Organization should implement a formal review and approval process for all journal entries related to federal grant programs. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our testing we noted that there was not an independent review performed on journal entries related to their federal grant program. Without a review process, there is an increased risk of inaccurate financial reporting and potential noncompliance. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization implement a formal review and approval process for all journal entries related to federal grant programs. Corrective Action. Management will implement an independent monthly review of all journal entries, including those related to the federal grant programs. The designated reviewer will be a senior accounting team member or equivalent who does not have the ability to create or approve journal entries in the general ledger system. The designated reviewer will compare the entries to ensure proper documentation, accurate amounts, correct coding, and compliance with the applicable federal grant regulations. Any discrepancies or issues identified during the review will be documented, and corrective actions will be taken immediately. The reviewer will sign off on the entries, confirming that all journal entries meet required standards. Responsible Person. Chris Sargent, President & Executive Officer Anticipated Completion Date. March 31, 2025

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.