← Back to home

Association of Illinois Soil & Water Conservation DistrictsNon-Profit

EIN: 376048356

UEI: QJ81C6YXHWF8

Audited by: Eck Schafer & Punke LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Association of Illinois Soil & Water Conservation Districts9 audit years4 findings2 repeat
9
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$1,901,929 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 16, 2026 (86 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

$2,131,100 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2025 — management decision was due July 7, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$1,888,039 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2024 — management decision was due August 8, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,873,173 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2023 — management decision was due July 30, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,390,282 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 4, 2021 — management decision was due May 4, 2022.

2020-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts failed to detect and correct federal funds passed through to various counties, which were over/under expended. Returned Federal funds passed through to various counties were not reissued to the correct county prior to year-end. Questionable Costs: Over-reimbursed costs of $13,020 and refunds not re-issued of $9,556. Context: Without effective internal controls and monitoring over grant expenditures, the district could over/under expend pass-through funds that could be considered allowable/unallowable. Cause: Participating counties submit invoice and work reports to the district to request funds based off work performed. Lack of review and/or monitoring of grand expenditures caused Association of Soil & Water Conservation Districts to over/under expend pass-through of federal funding, which sent incorrect amounts to incorrect counties. Effect: Expenditures recorded and reported to the grant agency included as allowable were not supported by actual documentation. Expenditures recorded and reported to the grant agency included allowable expenditures that were not issued to the recipients as stated. Recommendation: Management should review all internal controls over grant expenditures to ensure they are adequate to detect and timely adjust financial statement accounts. Management should take the time to thoroughly review grant expenditures in an effectively and timely manner. Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: Management is aware that refunds were due to the districts but were unable to return the funds due to issues with bank information. Follow-up with the districts to correct the issue was completed after the audit. The Association will institute a year-end review and oversight process including sub-recipient monitoring to fulfill its internal control and fiduciary obligations as grantee.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2020-002 This finding is: New Condition: Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts failed to detect and correct federal funds passed through to various counties, which were over/under expended. Returned Federal funds passed through to various counties were not reissued to the correct county prior to year-end. Questionable Costs: Over-reimbursed costs of $13,020 and refunds not re-issued of $9,556. Context: Without effective internal controls and monitoring over grant expenditures, the district could over/under expend pass-through funds that could be considered allowable/unallowable. Cause: Participating counties submit invoice and work reports to the district to request funds based off work performed. Lack of review and/or monitoring of grand expenditures caused Association of Soil & Water Conservation Districts to over/under expend pass-through of federal funding, which sent incorrect amounts to incorrect counties. Effect: Expenditures recorded and reported to the grant agency included as allowable were not supported by actual documentation. Expenditures recorded and reported to the grant agency included allowable expenditures that were not issued to the recipients as stated. Recommendation: Management should review all internal controls over grant expenditures to ensure they are adequate to detect and timely adjust financial statement accounts. Management should take the time to thoroughly review grant expenditures in an effectively and timely manner. Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: Management is aware that refunds were due to the districts but were unable to return the funds due to issues with bank information. Follow-up with the districts to correct the issue was completed after the audit. The Association will institute a year-end review and oversight process including sub-recipient monitoring to fulfill its internal control and fiduciary obligations as grantee.

Corrective Action Plan

RE: Finding 2020 - 002 The Association of Soil & Water Conservation Districts (AISWCD) takes its grant administration role seriously and has increased oversight and administration thereto in recent years. Prior to the fiscal year 2020 audit engagement, AISWCD had identified amounts due districts that had been rejected as ACH remittances due to closed sub-recipient financial institution accounts. Once sub-recipients provided updated banking information, AISWCD re-submitted grants to the respective districts. As such, these payments were not made prior to the close of the 2020 fiscal year. Additionally, grant applications are reviewed and reconciled monthly to ensure that proper payment has been remitted to sub-recipients. AISWCD will continue to institute a year-end review and oversight process including sub-recipient monitoring to fulfill its internal control and fiduciary obligations as grantee.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2019-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$947,859 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2020 — management decision was due June 1, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,144,862 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2020 — management decision was due October 20, 2020.

2018-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2017-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,340,739 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2018 — management decision was due June 4, 2019.

2017-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2016-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,333,493 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2017 — management decision was due January 17, 2018.

2016-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.