← Back to home

Century Unit School District No. 100Local Government

EIN: 376022482

UEI: CU1ZP9YNR8L7

Audited by: Beussink, Hey, Roe & Stroder, L.L.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Century Unit School District No. 1005 audit years4 findings
5
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$912.8K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$912,795 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 2, 2026 (27 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$976,114 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2025 — management decision was due August 5, 2025.

2024-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

During our tests of internal controls, it was discovered that two employees were paid incorrectly based on their step on the approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: $1,382.89. Context: Total salaries paid with these grant funds was approximately $176,802. Total salaries paid by the District was approximately $2,797,900. Effect: The District claimed salaries that were not allowable by the grant as the employees were overpaid based on the approved salary schedule. Cause: The District did not use the correct salary scale when setting up the salaries for these employees at the beginning of the year. Recommendation: We recommend the District pay its employees in accordance with Board approved amounts. Management's Response: The District will ensure that all employees are paid correctly based on the approved salary scale and step going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: For internal controls, wages should be appropriately paid according to amounts authroized by the Board, and this authorization should be documented. Condition: During our tests of internal controls, it was discovered that two employees were paid incorrectly based on their step on the approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: $1,382.89. Context: Total salaries paid with these grant funds was approximately $176,802. Total salaries paid by the District was approximately $2,797,900. Effect: The District claimed salaries that were not allowable by the grant as the employees were overpaid based on the approved salary schedule. Cause: The District did not use the correct salary scale when setting up the salaries for these employees at the beginning of the year. Recommendation: We recommend the District pay its employees in accordance with Board approved amounts. Management's Response: The District will ensure that all employees are paid correctly based on the approved salary scale and step going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Type: Material Weakness. Name of Contact Person: Landon Sommer, Superintendent. Recommendation: We recommend the District pay its employees in accordance with Board approved amounts. Corrective Action: The District will ensure that all employees are paid correctly based on the approved salary scale and step going forward. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-003
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The District did not file their Data Collection form on time. The 2023 Data Collection Form was not filed until June 10, 2024. Questioned Costs: N/A. Context: The Data Collection form must be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Cause: The District requested assistance from the auditing firm to upload the required form with oversight by the District. The submission was overlooked after the audit was completed. Recommendation: We recommend that all required filings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Management's Response: The Auditors discussed the issue with the District. A new checklist will be used with audit completion to ensure timely submission for the 2024 fiscal year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), "the data collection form must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditors' report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The District did not file their Data Collection form on time. The 2023 Data Collection Form was not filed until June 10, 2024. Questioned Costs: N/A. Context: The Data Collection form must be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Cause: The District requested assistance from the auditing firm to upload the required form with oversight by the District. The submission was overlooked after the audit was completed. Recommendation: We recommend that all required filings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Management's Response: The Auditors discussed the issue with the District. A new checklist will be used with audit completion to ensure timely submission for the 2024 fiscal year.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Type: Compliance. Name of Contact Person: Landon Sommer, Superintendent. Recommendation: We recommend that all required filings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines.

About Other →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,086,904 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 10, 2024 — management decision was due December 10, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,072,870 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2023 — management decision was due August 14, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,295,743 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2022 — management decision was due July 11, 2022.

2021-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District had transactions in excess of $25,000 with one vendor that they did not check for suspension and debarment or have a signed certification. Questioned Costs: None Context: Total payments to the vendor were $108,776 as of June 30, 2021. Effect: The District was at risk of making material payments to vendors who are not allowed to do business with the federal government. There was no noncompliance, but there was no internal control in place to prevent noncompliance. Cause: The District was not aware of this requirement. Recommendation: We recommend the District check the Excluded Parties List System or collect certifications from the entity for any vendor that the District expects to pay more than $25,000 for the year. Management's Response: We were not aware of this requirement, but we will ensure that we comply going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Condition: The District had transactions in excess of $25,000 with one vendor that they did not check for suspension and debarment or have a signed certification. Questioned Costs: None Context: Total payments to the vendor were $108,776 as of June 30, 2021. Effect: The District was at risk of making material payments to vendors who are not allowed to do business with the federal government. There was no noncompliance, but there was no internal control in place to prevent noncompliance. Cause: The District was not aware of this requirement. Recommendation: We recommend the District check the Excluded Parties List System or collect certifications from the entity for any vendor that the District expects to pay more than $25,000 for the year. Management's Response: We were not aware of this requirement, but we will ensure that we comply going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-004 Internal Controls over Compliance with Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Weakness CFDA 10.553, 10.555 and 10.559 Name of Contact Person: Landon Sommer, Superintendent Recommendation: We recommend the District check the Excluded Parties List System or collect certifications from the entity for any vendor that the District expects to pay more than $25,000 for the year. Corrective Action: We will ensure to review the Excluded Parties List System or receive a signed certification from any vendor we expect to pay more than $25,000. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2021-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District over reported expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 for the grant by claiming expenditures for fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2022 on the fiscal year 2021 expenditure reports. Questioned Costs: None Context: Total expenditures claimed for the grant were $399,387 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Effect: Expenditures were not reported in the correct accounting period for these grants. Cause: There was a lack of oversight by the Superintendent on the preparation of the quarterly expenditure reports along with the supporting documentation used to prepare them by the Bookkeeper. The reports were prepared for the incorrect dates resulting in the inaccuracy. Recommendation: We recommend that the Superintendent review the quarterly expenditure reports and all supporting documentation to ensure all costs are reported accurately. Management's Response: The Superintendent will review the quarterly expenditure reports and all supporting documentation to ensure they are accurate going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: For grant reporting to be accurate, expenditures should only be claimed in the fiscal year in which they were actually spent. Condition: The District over reported expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 for the grant by claiming expenditures for fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2022 on the fiscal year 2021 expenditure reports. Questioned Costs: None Context: Total expenditures claimed for the grant were $399,387 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Effect: Expenditures were not reported in the correct accounting period for these grants. Cause: There was a lack of oversight by the Superintendent on the preparation of the quarterly expenditure reports along with the supporting documentation used to prepare them by the Bookkeeper. The reports were prepared for the incorrect dates resulting in the inaccuracy. Recommendation: We recommend that the Superintendent review the quarterly expenditure reports and all supporting documentation to ensure all costs are reported accurately. Management's Response: The Superintendent will review the quarterly expenditure reports and all supporting documentation to ensure they are accurate going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2021-005 Internal Controls over Compliance with Reporting Finding Type: Significant Deficiency 84.425D Name of Contact Person: Landon Sommer, Superintendent Recommendation: We recommend that the Superintendent review the quarterly expenditure reports and all supporting documentation to ensure all costs are reported accurately. Corrective Action: The Superintendent will review the quarterly expenditures reports and all supporting documentation to ensure they are accurate going forward. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.