EIN: 376013165
UEI: PNKVVAMN94Z5
Audited by: Scheffel Boyle
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 24, 2024 (615 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Reporting. All quarterly expenditure reports must be filed with the Illinois State Board of Education no later than 20 days after the end of the quarter. We noted that 7 of the 10 quarterly expenditure reports were not filed in a timely manner. There are no questioned costs. Out of the 10 quarterly reports submitted by the District for FY22, 7 were filed after the 20 day deadline. ESSER Digital Equity and ESSER II both had three reports submitted after the deadline and ESSER III had one report submitted a significant amount of time after the due date. This late report triggered the single audit for FY22. Reporting requirements were not met. This was an oversight by management personnel in the District due to turnover in the District Office. The District did not employ proper oversight to ensure that the quarterly expenditure reports were filed timely.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reporting. All quarterly expenditure reports must be filed with the Illinois State Board of Education no later than 20 days after the end of the quarter. We noted that 7 of the 10 quarterly expenditure reports were not filed in a timely manner. There are no questioned costs. Out of the 10 quarterly reports submitted by the District for FY22, 7 were filed after the 20 day deadline. ESSER Digital Equity and ESSER II both had three reports submitted after the deadline and ESSER III had one report submitted a significant amount of time after the due date. This late report triggered the single audit for FY22. Reporting requirements were not met. This was an oversight by management personnel in the District due to turnover in the District Office. The District did not employ proper oversight to ensure that the quarterly expenditure reports were filed timely.
We recommend that steps are taken, including oversight by a second employee, to ensure that all quarterly expenditure reports are filed by the due dates.
Reporting. The accounts used to record expenditures on the quarterly expenditure reports should match the general ledger accounts when the expenditures are recorded. It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure reports. There are no questioned costs. An item of $509.69 was reported as a capital outlay expense, but was recorded in the general ledger in a supplies account. It does not meet the $500 threshold for being reported as equipment in capital outlay. The District should have recorded this item as a supplies expenditure. An expenditure item of $19,100 was listed on the budget as a purchased service but was recorded in a supplies account. An item of $4,387 was reported as a purchased service, but recorded on the general ledger in a supplies account. The expenditures were not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. A coding error was made when entering the expenditures into the general ledger.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reporting. The accounts used to record expenditures on the quarterly expenditure reports should match the general ledger accounts when the expenditures are recorded. It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure reports. There are no questioned costs. An item of $509.69 was reported as a capital outlay expense, but was recorded in the general ledger in a supplies account. It does not meet the $500 threshold for being reported as equipment in capital outlay. The District should have recorded this item as a supplies expenditure. An expenditure item of $19,100 was listed on the budget as a purchased service but was recorded in a supplies account. An item of $4,387 was reported as a purchased service, but recorded on the general ledger in a supplies account. The expenditures were not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. A coding error was made when entering the expenditures into the general ledger.
The District will review the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.