← Back to home

DANVILLE COMMUNITY CONS SDLocal Government

EIN: 376004781

UEI: T8XAYKXNN6D3

Audited by: Sikich CPA LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

DANVILLE COMMUNITY CONS SD10 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$20.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$20,634,325 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 30, 2026 (122 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$33,675,133 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2025 — management decision was due November 12, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$25,520,211 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$18,794,735 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2023 — management decision was due September 20, 2023.

2022-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

A nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. During our testing we noted the District did not formally document that certain vendors were a sole source or emergency purchase provider. Lack of proper documentation of procurement was noted in 4 of 10 vendors requiring procurement procedures to be followed. The effect was noncompliance with grant requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

A nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. During our testing we noted the District did not formally document that certain vendors were a sole source or emergency purchase provider. Lack of proper documentation of procurement was noted in 4 of 10 vendors requiring procurement procedures to be followed. The effect was noncompliance with grant requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Some of the vendors were utilized in emergency situations due to shipping issues and lack of needed supplies. We are training administrative staff on the procedures and proper documentation needed to support the rationale for those purchases. Other vendors have also been utilized for products not available from any other vendor in the area. We are training administrative staff on the procedures and proper documentation needed to support the rationale for those purchases.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

$12,094,972 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2022 — management decision was due July 23, 2022.

2021-005
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

A non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In one group of transactions tested, the District did not document that the vendor was a sole source provider. In another group of transactions, there was no supporting documentation of proper procurement procedures since over $25,000 in total was spent. The cause is lack of understanding of the requirements. We recommend that all required documentation is maintained for procurement purchases per Uniform Guidance and the District's procurement policies. Training should occur for personnel involved, if necessary

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

A non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In one group of transactions tested, the District did not document that the vendor was a sole source provider. In another group of transactions, there was no supporting documentation of proper procurement procedures since over $25,000 in total was spent. The cause is lack of understanding of the requirements. We recommend that all required documentation is maintained for procurement purchases per Uniform Guidance and the District's procurement policies. Training should occur for personnel involved, if necessary

Corrective Action Plan

The vendors utilized for specialized services such as: occupational therapist, physical therapist, speech and language pathologist, social workers and psychologist are all housed and employed by the same company. This has been our practice in the past as this is the only vendor in the area that offers these comprehensive services. The costs associated with the hearing and vision itinerants are based on the previous years required student support. The number of students requiring service minutes for hearing and vision increased unexpectedly driving up the costs of the service. The vision itinerant is split between Danville SD#118 and the County Special Ed Coop. We are working on a process that will ensure that we maintain supporting documentation of an sole source provider information in addition to procurement of specialized services.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-06-30

$9,676,565 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2021 — management decision was due July 26, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$10,946,304 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$9,650,534 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2018 — management decision was due June 4, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$9,953,462 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 16, 2017 — management decision was due May 16, 2018.

2017-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,021,780 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2017 — management decision was due July 9, 2017.

2016-006
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.