← Back to home

FREEBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 70Local Government

EIN: 376004471

UEI: LB1JPAVU7XA9

Audited by: SCHEFFEL BOYLE

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

FREEBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 703 audit years5 findings1 repeat
3
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$917.9K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$917,944 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 16, 2024 (815 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2023-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-003OTHER MATTERS

It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure report. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Tied out all the expenditure account numbers in the general ledger versus the 6/30/23 expenditure reports. Noted that the Preschool expenditures were recorded in 2210-300 in the general ledger but were reported in 4000-300 on the expenditure report; for IDEA expenditures recorded in 1220-300 in the general ledger were reported in 2130-300 on the expenditure report, that 1210-100 in the general ledger were reported as 3700-100 on the expenditure report, that 1210-200 in the general eldger were reported in 3700-200 on the expenditure report and that 2210-300 in the general ledger was reported in 4000-300 on the expenditure report; for ARP IDEA expenditure reports recorded in 1220-400 in the general ledger were reported as 3700-400 on the expenditure report and 2210-300 in the general ledger were reported as 4000-300 on the expenditure report. Effect: The expenditure e not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. Cause: A coding error was made when entering the expenditures into the the general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting for more accurate reporting. Management's response: The District will review the general ledger to the expediture reports before submitting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Reporting. The accounts used to record expenditures on the quarterly expenditure reports should match the general ledger accounts when the expenditures are recorded. Condition: It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure report. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Tied out all the expenditure account numbers in the general ledger versus the 6/30/23 expenditure reports. Noted that the Preschool expenditures were recorded in 2210-300 in the general ledger but were reported in 4000-300 on the expenditure report; for IDEA expenditures recorded in 1220-300 in the general ledger were reported in 2130-300 on the expenditure report, that 1210-100 in the general ledger were reported as 3700-100 on the expenditure report, that 1210-200 in the general eldger were reported in 3700-200 on the expenditure report and that 2210-300 in the general ledger was reported in 4000-300 on the expenditure report; for ARP IDEA expenditure reports recorded in 1220-400 in the general ledger were reported as 3700-400 on the expenditure report and 2210-300 in the general ledger were reported as 4000-300 on the expenditure report. Effect: The expenditure e not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. Cause: A coding error was made when entering the expenditures into the the general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting for more accurate reporting. Management's response: The District will review the general ledger to the expediture reports before submitting.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees to review the general ledger to the expenditure repoort before sumitting.

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Reporting →
2023-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

It was noted that an expense was budgeted and recorded in the 400 supplies account but should have been budgeted and recorded in the 500 capital outlay account. Questioned costs: $1,233 for a washer/dryer that was paid for out of the supply accounts but should have been budgeted and paid for out of a capital outlay account. Context: The District budgeted for supplies for the Early Childhood special education classroom in the 400 account for a total of $4,006. The District purchased a washer/dryer for $1,233 that should have been budgeted for out of the 500 account. Effect: The District did not properly budget for the expenses in the grant. Cause: A budgeting error was made when completing the budget. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the budget and amending as ncessary. Management's response: The District will review the budget and amend as necessary during the year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Reporting. The District budgeted a capital outlay item in a supply account. Condition: It was noted that an expense was budgeted and recorded in the 400 supplies account but should have been budgeted and recorded in the 500 capital outlay account. Questioned costs: $1,233 for a washer/dryer that was paid for out of the supply accounts but should have been budgeted and paid for out of a capital outlay account. Context: The District budgeted for supplies for the Early Childhood special education classroom in the 400 account for a total of $4,006. The District purchased a washer/dryer for $1,233 that should have been budgeted for out of the 500 account. Effect: The District did not properly budget for the expenses in the grant. Cause: A budgeting error was made when completing the budget. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the budget and amending as ncessary. Management's response: The District will review the budget and amend as necessary during the year.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees to review the budget and amend as necessary during the year.

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,379,161 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 20, 2022 — management decision was due May 20, 2023.

2022-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure reports. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Tied out all the expenditure account numbers to the general ledger versus the 6/30/22 expenditure reports. Noted that the expenditures were recorded in 1000-100 in the general ledger but were reported in 2210-100 on the expenditure report. Also noted that 1000-300 in the general ledger was reported in 2210-300 on the expenditure report and 1000-400 in the general ledger was reported as 2110-400 on the expenditure report. Effect: The expenditures were not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. Cause: A coding error was made when entering the expenditure into the general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting for more accurate reporting. Management response: The District will review the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Reporting. The accounts used to record expenditure on the quarterly expenditure reports should match the general ledger accounts when the expenditures are recorded. Condition: It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure reports. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Tied out all the expenditure account numbers to the general ledger versus the 6/30/22 expenditure reports. Noted that the expenditures were recorded in 1000-100 in the general ledger but were reported in 2210-100 on the expenditure report. Also noted that 1000-300 in the general ledger was reported in 2210-300 on the expenditure report and 1000-400 in the general ledger was reported as 2110-400 on the expenditure report. Effect: The expenditures were not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. Cause: A coding error was made when entering the expenditure into the general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting for more accurate reporting. Management response: The District will review the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure report. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure report before submitting to review for accuracy. Management response: Management agrees to review the general ledger to the expenditure report before submitting. Anticipated date of completion: June 30, 2023.

About Reporting →
2022-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The District did not submit timely expenditure reports. The Illinois State Board of Education requires that expenditure reports be submitted on a quarterly basis 20 days after the quarter ends (10/20, 1/20, 4/20 and 7/20). Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Of the 4 quarterly expenditure reports for ESSER II for project year 2022 that were submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education, 1 quarterly report was filed 13 days late. Effect: The District was not in compliance by filing their expenditure reports late. Cause: The District did not provide proper oversight to ensure that the quarterly expenditure reports were filed timely. Recommendation: We recommend that steps are taken to ensure that all quarterly reports are filed by the due dates. Management response: The District will take the necessary steps to file all quarterly expenditure reports on time in the future.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Reporting. All quarterly expenditure reports should be filed 20 days after quarter end. Condition: The District did not submit timely expenditure reports. The Illinois State Board of Education requires that expenditure reports be submitted on a quarterly basis 20 days after the quarter ends (10/20, 1/20, 4/20 and 7/20). Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Of the 4 quarterly expenditure reports for ESSER II for project year 2022 that were submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education, 1 quarterly report was filed 13 days late. Effect: The District was not in compliance by filing their expenditure reports late. Cause: The District did not provide proper oversight to ensure that the quarterly expenditure reports were filed timely. Recommendation: We recommend that steps are taken to ensure that all quarterly reports are filed by the due dates. Management response: The District will take the necessary steps to file all quarterly expenditure reports on time in the future.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The District did not submit timely expenditure reports to the Illinois State Board of Education. 1 quarterly expenditure report was 13 days late. Recommendation: We recommend that steps are taken to ensure that all quarterly reports are filed by the due dates. Management response: Management agrees to take the necessary steps to file all quarterly expenditure reports on time in the future. Anticipated Date of Completion: June 30, 2023.

About Reporting →
2022-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure reports. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Tied out all the expenditure account numbers to the general ledger versus the 6/30/22 expenditure reports. Noted that the expenditures were recorded in 1220-300 in the general ledger but were reported in 2130-400 on the expenditure report. Also noted that 1210-100 in the general ledger was reported in 3700-100 on the expenditure report and 1210-200 in the general ledger was reported as 3700-200 on the expenditure report and that 2210-300 in the general ledger was reported in 4000-300 on the expenditure report. Effect: The expenditures were not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. Cause: A coding error was made when entering the expenditure into the general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting for more accurate reporting. Management response: The District will review the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Reporting. The accounts used to record expenditure on the quarterly expenditure reports should match the general ledger accounts when the expenditures are recorded. Condition: It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure reports. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Context: Tied out all the expenditure account numbers to the general ledger versus the 6/30/22 expenditure reports. Noted that the expenditures were recorded in 1220-300 in the general ledger but were reported in 2130-400 on the expenditure report. Also noted that 1210-100 in the general ledger was reported in 3700-100 on the expenditure report and 1210-200 in the general ledger was reported as 3700-200 on the expenditure report and that 2210-300 in the general ledger was reported in 4000-300 on the expenditure report. Effect: The expenditures were not recorded/reported consistently between the two reports. Cause: A coding error was made when entering the expenditure into the general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting for more accurate reporting. Management response: The District will review the general ledger to the expenditure reports before submitting.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: It was noted that there was an inconsistency when comparing the general ledger to what was reported on the expenditure report. Recommendation: We recommend reviewing the general ledger to the expenditure report before submitting to review for accuracy. Management response: Management agrees to review the general ledger to the expenditure report before submitting. Anticipated date of completion: June 30, 2023.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$913,971 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2021 — management decision was due May 1, 2022.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.