Cairo School District No. 1Local Government

EIN: 376002421

UEI: MUYXKN1YV7R4

Audited by: Beussink, Hey, Roe & Stroder, L.L.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Cairo School District No. 110 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,644,630 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 6, 2026 (38 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The District paid $3,990 for pre-K playground equipment and $193 for mileage for sports game supervision with Title I: Grants to Local Education Agencies funds. These items are not allowable costs of the grant as they do not support the educational needs of students. Questioned Costs: $4,183 of known questioned costs and $5,938 of projected questioned costs. Context: Total grant expenditures for Title I: Grants to Local Educational Agencies were $776,402 for the year ended June 30, 2025. Effect: The District received reimbursement for expenditures that were not allowable under the grant agreement. Cause: The District recorded these expenditures as Title I expenditures in error. Recommendation: We recommend that the District only charge costs that are allowable under the grant agreement. We also recommend that the District contact ISBE to discuss if the District will need to return the funds reimbursed by the Illinois School Bopard of Education for these unallowed expenditures. Management's Response: The District will ensure that all costs charged to the Title I grant are allowable per the grant agreement going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per the Illinois State Board of Education "TitleI, Part A is designed to provide all children significant opportunity to receive a fair, equitable, and high-quality education, and to close educational achievement gaps." Condition: The District paid $3,990 for pre-K playground equipment and $193 for mileage for sports game supervision with Title I: Grants to Local Education Agencies funds. These items are not allowable costs of the grant as they do not support the educational needs of students. Questioned Costs: $4,183 of known questioned costs and $5,938 of projected questioned costs. Context: Total grant expenditures for Title I: Grants to Local Educational Agencies were $776,402 for the year ended June 30, 2025. Effect: The District received reimbursement for expenditures that were not allowable under the grant agreement. Cause: The District recorded these expenditures as Title I expenditures in error. Recommendation: We recommend that the District only charge costs that are allowable under the grant agreement. We also recommend that the District contact ISBE to discuss if the District will need to return the funds reimbursed by the Illinois School Bopard of Education for these unallowed expenditures. Management's Response: The District will ensure that all costs charged to the Title I grant are allowable per the grant agreement going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Contact Person: Pamela Rizkallah, Superintendent. Recommendation: We recommend that the District only charge costs that are allowable under the grant agreement. We also recommend that the District contact ISBE to discuss if the District will need to return the funds reimbursed by the Illinois School Board of Education for these unallowable expenditures. Corrective Action: The District will ensure that all costs charged to the Title I grant are allowable per the grant agreement going forward. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,283,576 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2025 — management decision was due July 28, 2025.

2024-008
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District Did not report grant expenditures totaling $150,733. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Total grant expenditures for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund were $2,105,124 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Effect: The District did not report $150,733 of expenditures charged to the grant that could lead to the District not receiving reimbursement. Cause: The Bookkeeper reported the month-to-date balance for certain expenditures instead of the year-to-date amount since the expenditure reports are cumulative. The Superintendent does not receive the supporting documentation when approving the expenditure reports to ensure all costs are correctly reported. Recommendation: We recommend that the Superintendent review all supporting documentation for the expenditure reports submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education to ensure all costs are correctly reported before he approves the reports. Management's Response: The Superintendent will review all supporting documentation for the expenditure reports before he approves the reports going forward. The District has contacted the Illinois State Board of Education to re-open the report for correction.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: For effective internal controls, the Superintendent should be reviewing supporting documentation for the grant expenditure reports submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education to ensure all costs charged to the grant are correctly reported. Condition: The District Did not report grant expenditures totaling $150,733. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Total grant expenditures for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund were $2,105,124 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Effect: The District did not report $150,733 of expenditures charged to the grant that could lead to the District not receiving reimbursement. Cause: The Bookkeeper reported the month-to-date balance for certain expenditures instead of the year-to-date amount since the expenditure reports are cumulative. The Superintendent does not receive the supporting documentation when approving the expenditure reports to ensure all costs are correctly reported. Recommendation: We recommend that the Superintendent review all supporting documentation for the expenditure reports submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education to ensure all costs are correctly reported before he approves the reports. Management's Response: The Superintendent will review all supporting documentation for the expenditure reports before he approves the reports going forward. The District has contacted the Illinois State Board of Education to re-open the report for correction.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Type: Compliance. Name of Contact Person: Ronald Ferrell, Superintendent. Recommendation: We recommend that the Superintendent review all supporting documentation for the expenditure reports submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education to ensure all costs are correctly reported before he approves the reports. Corrective Action: The Superintendent will review all supporting documentation for the expenditure reports before he approves the reports going forward. The District has contacted the Illinois State Board of Education to re-open the report for correction.

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,905,319 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2024 — management decision was due September 22, 2024.

2023-003
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The District did not file their Data Collection Form on time. The 2022 Data Collection Form was not filed until May 23, 2023. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Data Collection Form must be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Effect: The District is not in compliane with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Cause: The District requested assistance from teh auditing firm to upload the required form with oversight by the District. The submission was overlooked after the audit was completed. Recommendation: We recommend that all required filings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Management's Response: The auditors discussed the issue with the District. A new checklist will be used with audit completion to ensure timely submission for the 2023 fiscal year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per Title 2 C.F.R.200.512(d), "the data collection form must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The District did not file their Data Collection Form on time. The 2022 Data Collection Form was not filed until May 23, 2023. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Data Collection Form must be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Effect: The District is not in compliane with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Cause: The District requested assistance from teh auditing firm to upload the required form with oversight by the District. The submission was overlooked after the audit was completed. Recommendation: We recommend that all required filings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Management's Response: The auditors discussed the issue with the District. A new checklist will be used with audit completion to ensure timely submission for the 2023 fiscal year.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Contact Person: Ronald Ferrell, Superintendent. Recommendation: We recommend that all required filings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Corrective Action: The auditors discussed the issue with the District, and the auditors will ensure timely submission for the 2023 fiscal year. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.

About Other →
2023-004
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District did not have adequate documentation of approval for all expenditures. We tested 40 disbursements made from the Education Stabilization Fund grant program and found 12 disbursements missing the necessary documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Total expenditures of the program were $2,737,716 for the year ended June 30, 2023. The 12 disbursements without documentation of an approval totaled $408,652. Effect: Increases the risk that inappropriate expenditures could be applied to the grant program resulting in overcharging the grant for costs incurred. Our test was a statistical sample of 40 expenditures and 12 did not have supervisory approval. Cause: The District was not aware that the approval by an authorized individual, such as the Superintendent, needed to be documented on the invoices before payment was made. Recommendation: We recommend the District provide proper documentation of approval by the Superintendent or other appropriate individual independent of the check preparation process, for payment of invoices. Management's Response: The Superintendent will begin initialing each invoice to document his approval going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: For internal controls, expenditures should be adequately authorized by the Superintendent or other appropriate individual independent of the check preparation process, and this authorization should be documented. Condition: The District did not have adequate documentation of approval for all expenditures. We tested 40 disbursements made from the Education Stabilization Fund grant program and found 12 disbursements missing the necessary documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Total expenditures of the program were $2,737,716 for the year ended June 30, 2023. The 12 disbursements without documentation of an approval totaled $408,652. Effect: Increases the risk that inappropriate expenditures could be applied to the grant program resulting in overcharging the grant for costs incurred. Our test was a statistical sample of 40 expenditures and 12 did not have supervisory approval. Cause: The District was not aware that the approval by an authorized individual, such as the Superintendent, needed to be documented on the invoices before payment was made. Recommendation: We recommend the District provide proper documentation of approval by the Superintendent or other appropriate individual independent of the check preparation process, for payment of invoices. Management's Response: The Superintendent will begin initialing each invoice to document his approval going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Contact Person: Ronald Ferrell, Superintendent. Recommendation: The District needs to provide proper documentation of the Superintendent's approval for payment of invoices. Corrective Action: The Superintendent will start initialing his approval on each invoice, or on the corresponding purchase order. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$3,467,662 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2023 — management decision was due November 22, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,873,549 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 6, 2022 — management decision was due April 6, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$1,196,177 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 10, 2020 — management decision was due May 10, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,306,980 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2019 — management decision was due May 17, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,006,821 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2019 — management decision was due July 13, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,136,192 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 20, 2017 — management decision was due May 20, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION$1,243,804 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2017 — management decision was due July 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.