EIN: 376002207
UEI: SYCSGE2J15S1
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 9, 2026 (95 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 9, 2025 — management decision was due November 9, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on August 20, 2024 — management decision was due February 20, 2025.
Several purchases for Federal awards did not complete the suspension and debarment procedures prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned Costs: None Context: Federal Transit Formula Grant – Two of two contractors were selected for testing. For one of the contractors, there was no documentation maintained to support the county completed the suspension and debarment procedures. COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Two of four contractors were selected for testing. For one of the contractors, there was no documentation maintained to support the county completed the suspension and debarment procedures. Cause: The processes for suspension and were not properly followed during the current fiscal year. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: The Citty recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-004 Federal Agencies: Federal Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Federal Transit Formula Grant Assistance Listing Number: 20.507 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): IL-2020-024-00, IL-2022-029, and IL-2022-008-00 Award Period: 2020 - 2022 Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). Condition: Several purchases for Federal awards did not complete the suspension and debarment procedures prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned Costs: None Context: Federal Transit Formula Grant – Two of two contractors were selected for testing. For one of the contractors, there was no documentation maintained to support the county completed the suspension and debarment procedures. COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Two of four contractors were selected for testing. For one of the contractors, there was no documentation maintained to support the county completed the suspension and debarment procedures. Cause: The processes for suspension and were not properly followed during the current fiscal year. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: The Citty recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 2023-004 Federal Transit Formula Grant/COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 20.07/21.027 Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The City will develop a review process which satisfy the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance. Following development of the process, staff will be assigned to monitoring the need for this process and when appropriate, complete necessary procedure to document findings relative to suspension or debarment. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Ashlyn Massey, City Comptroller Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Ongoing
FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2023 — management decision was due March 19, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2022 — management decision was due July 3, 2022.
During the course of the audit, it was noted that the Danville Public Transit does not have a policy or procedure to verify whether a contractor or vendor is suspended or debarred. CLA completed the SAM search and none of the vendors where suspended or debarred and therefore no compliance or questioned costs. . Questioned costs: None Context: During the audit, it was noted that two of two transactions tested, for in which there was no documentation maintained as to whether the vendor was suspended or debarred. Cause: The City did not have controls over this compliance requirement in place during the year. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat Finding: The finding is not repeat of a finding. Recommendation: We recommend updating written policies and ensuring a procedure is in place to verify vendors or contractors are not suspended or debarred from doing business and maintaining documentation of this. Views of responsible official: The City of Danville recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2021 ? 004 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal program title: Federal Transit Formula Cluster CFDA Number: 20.507 Pass-Through Numbers: IL-2019-021, IL-2020-024, IL 20-2020-39-00 Award Period: 2019-2020 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Federal guidelines require the entity to have procedures documented to verify the vendor of a covered transaction (over $25,000) is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering into a covered transaction. Condition: During the course of the audit, it was noted that the Danville Public Transit does not have a policy or procedure to verify whether a contractor or vendor is suspended or debarred. CLA completed the SAM search and none of the vendors where suspended or debarred and therefore no compliance or questioned costs. . Questioned costs: None Context: During the audit, it was noted that two of two transactions tested, for in which there was no documentation maintained as to whether the vendor was suspended or debarred. Cause: The City did not have controls over this compliance requirement in place during the year. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat Finding: The finding is not repeat of a finding. Recommendation: We recommend updating written policies and ensuring a procedure is in place to verify vendors or contractors are not suspended or debarred from doing business and maintaining documentation of this. Views of responsible official: The City of Danville recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.
U.S. Department of Transportation 2021-004 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (CFDA#20.507) Recommendation: We recommend updating written policies and ensuring a procedure is in place to verify vendors or contractors are not suspended or debarred from doing business and maintaining documentation of this. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: With respect to the City?s need to improve the review and approval process for disbursements, the City of Danville has implemented new review processes for disbursements to vendors over $25,000. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Lisa Beith, Director, Danville Mass Transit Planned completion date for corrective action plan: April 30, 2021
FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2021 — management decision was due July 6, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
There was one instance out of nine where a drawdown packet included expenses not related to CDBG activities. Context: The community development specialist prepares the drawdown request and includes support for expenses included in the drawdown packet. The drawdown request is then reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Cause: The drawdown request support was not properly reviewed for accuracy of expenses being charged to the grant. The error was an oversight. Effect: Proper review of the drawdown request, including agreement of support to amounts included within the request was not completed to ensure only allowable activities are being charged to the CDBG grant. Recommendation: Management should review controls in place around the review and approval of drawdown requests to ensure expenses are properly supported and relate to activities within the CDBG grant program. Views of responsible official: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency/Program: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ? 14.218 ? Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Questioned Costs: $5,138 Criteria or Specific Requirement: According the City?s internal controls, the grant manager should review drawdown packets prior to reimbursement request is made to ensure the request is accurate. Condition: There was one instance out of nine where a drawdown packet included expenses not related to CDBG activities. Context: The community development specialist prepares the drawdown request and includes support for expenses included in the drawdown packet. The drawdown request is then reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Cause: The drawdown request support was not properly reviewed for accuracy of expenses being charged to the grant. The error was an oversight. Effect: Proper review of the drawdown request, including agreement of support to amounts included within the request was not completed to ensure only allowable activities are being charged to the CDBG grant. Recommendation: Management should review controls in place around the review and approval of drawdown requests to ensure expenses are properly supported and relate to activities within the CDBG grant program. Views of responsible official: There is no disagreement with the finding.
With respect to the City's need to improve the review and approval process for CDBG reimbursement requests, the City of Danville has employed new staff to take direct responsibility and oversight of CDBG reimbursement requests. Corrective measures, such as, regular and correct reporting, and director oversight have been implemented and ongoing since June of this year.
There was one instance out of four where a request for funds summary included expenses not properly supported for the period covered under the request. Context: The request for funds summary is prepared based on payroll reports for the period covered by the request. Cause: The request for funds summary and support was not properly reviewed for accuracy of expenses being charged to the grant. The error was an oversight. Effect: Proper review of the request for funds summary, including agreement of payroll reports to amounts included within the request to ensure accuracy was not completed. Recommendation: Management should review controls in place around the review and approval of request for funds summary to ensure expenses are properly supported and within the period covered within the request. Views of responsible official: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency/Program: U.S. Department of Homeland Security ? 97.083 ? SAFER Grant Questioned Costs: $12,410 Criteria or Specific Requirement: According the City?s internal controls, the grant manager should review request for funds summary prior to reimbursement request is made to ensure the request is accurate. Condition: There was one instance out of four where a request for funds summary included expenses not properly supported for the period covered under the request. Context: The request for funds summary is prepared based on payroll reports for the period covered by the request. Cause: The request for funds summary and support was not properly reviewed for accuracy of expenses being charged to the grant. The error was an oversight. Effect: Proper review of the request for funds summary, including agreement of payroll reports to amounts included within the request to ensure accuracy was not completed. Recommendation: Management should review controls in place around the review and approval of request for funds summary to ensure expenses are properly supported and within the period covered within the request. Views of responsible official: There is no disagreement with the finding.
With respect to the City's controls around review and approval of SAFER grant reimbursement requests, the City of Danville will add an additional level of internal approval to ensure that no future reimbursement requests are submitted prior to completion of the period requested.
FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2018 — management decision was due June 19, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2017 — management decision was due June 10, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2017 — management decision was due July 3, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
