EIN: 371923394
UEI: ZSYLM736F9J3
Audited by: BRADY MARTZ, PLLC
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 27, 2027 (169 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Material Weakness – Reporting The Uniform Guidance requires that all entities that expend in excess of $750,000 to file audited financial statements and Data Collection Form within 9 months of year-end. (2 CFR Section 200.512). Entities are required to submit timely GAAP-based audited financial information to HUD’s Financial Assessment Subsystem within 90 days of year end. (24 CFR Section 5.801(c)(2) and HUD Handbook 4065.1 REV-1, paragraph 2-1 (D)(1)(b)). Condition The Project’s December 31, 2024 audited financial statements were not filed with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of year-end. The audited financial statements were not reported to HUD’s Financial Assessment Subsystem within 90 days of year end. Cause Turnover in staffing and lack of oversight led to information not being ready for audit in a timely manner. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Context We reviewed all report submissions for compliance and internal controls. Effect The Project could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Project review its internal control policies and procedures to ensure timely reporting. Response The Project agrees with the finding and will implement controls to ensure timely reporting for future submissions.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Material Weakness – Reporting The Uniform Guidance requires that all entities that expend in excess of $750,000 to file audited financial statements and Data Collection Form within 9 months of year-end. (2 CFR Section 200.512). Entities are required to submit timely GAAP-based audited financial information to HUD’s Financial Assessment Subsystem within 90 days of year end. (24 CFR Section 5.801(c)(2) and HUD Handbook 4065.1 REV-1, paragraph 2-1 (D)(1)(b)). Condition The Project’s December 31, 2024 audited financial statements were not filed with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of year-end. The audited financial statements were not reported to HUD’s Financial Assessment Subsystem within 90 days of year end. Cause Turnover in staffing and lack of oversight led to information not being ready for audit in a timely manner. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Context We reviewed all report submissions for compliance and internal controls. Effect The Project could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Project review its internal control policies and procedures to ensure timely reporting. Response The Project agrees with the finding and will implement controls to ensure timely reporting for future submissions.
Contact Person – Matt Bakke, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan – The Project will review its policies and procedures over monthly reconciliations. Completion Date – 12/31/26
Significant Deficiency – Eligibility Criteria The Project is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls to ensure tenant files are complete, accurate, and maintained in accordance with applicable program requirements. Effective internal controls include periodic monitoring and supervisory review of tenant files. Condition During our testing, we noted that the Project did not have documentation to show they performed periodic reviews of tenant files throughout the year. Cause Turnover in staffing and lack of oversight led to no documentation of periodic reviews. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Context No files were reviewed. Effect Without documentation of periodic tenant file reviews, the Project cannot demonstrate that adequate monitoring of controls are operating effectively and could lead to errors being made and not caught timely. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Project implement formal procedures requiring documentation evidencing the completion of periodic reviews be maintained. Response The Project agrees with the finding and will implement controls to ensure proper documentation of periodic reviews of tenant files.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Significant Deficiency – Eligibility Criteria The Project is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls to ensure tenant files are complete, accurate, and maintained in accordance with applicable program requirements. Effective internal controls include periodic monitoring and supervisory review of tenant files. Condition During our testing, we noted that the Project did not have documentation to show they performed periodic reviews of tenant files throughout the year. Cause Turnover in staffing and lack of oversight led to no documentation of periodic reviews. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Context No files were reviewed. Effect Without documentation of periodic tenant file reviews, the Project cannot demonstrate that adequate monitoring of controls are operating effectively and could lead to errors being made and not caught timely. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Project implement formal procedures requiring documentation evidencing the completion of periodic reviews be maintained. Response The Project agrees with the finding and will implement controls to ensure proper documentation of periodic reviews of tenant files.
Contact Person – Matt Bakke, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan – The Project will review its policies and procedures over documentation of periodic review of tenant files. Completion Date – 12/31/26
Material Weakness – Special Tests and Provisions – Waiting List Administration and Tenant Selection Criteria The Project is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls to ensure eligible applicants be selected from the waiting list in accordance with established preferences and the chronological order of application, unless a documented exception is permitted. The Project is responsible for maintaining effective internal controls to ensure applicants are selected and admitted in compliance with HUD requirements and its approved Administrative Plan. Condition During our testing of tenant admissions, we noted that applicants were admitted to the Project without being selected in accordance with the approved waiting list. Cause Turnover in staffing and lack of oversight led to internal controls not being followed in compliance with waiting list requirements. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Effect The Project cannot demonstrate that housing opportunities were offered fairly and consistently to eligible applicants. Failure to follow waiting list procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with HUD requirements and may result in eligible applicants being improperly bypassed. Context We noted 2 of 5 tenants selected from the continuously rolling waiting list were selected in the wrong order. In reviewing the remainder of the waiting list, we noted other applicants were offered out of order as well. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Project implement supervisory review procedures over tenant admissions, require documentation of all waiting list exceptions, and periodically monitor compliance with waiting list selection procedures. Response The Project agrees with the finding and will implement controls to ensure proper selection from the waiting list.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Material Weakness – Special Tests and Provisions – Waiting List Administration and Tenant Selection Criteria The Project is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls to ensure eligible applicants be selected from the waiting list in accordance with established preferences and the chronological order of application, unless a documented exception is permitted. The Project is responsible for maintaining effective internal controls to ensure applicants are selected and admitted in compliance with HUD requirements and its approved Administrative Plan. Condition During our testing of tenant admissions, we noted that applicants were admitted to the Project without being selected in accordance with the approved waiting list. Cause Turnover in staffing and lack of oversight led to internal controls not being followed in compliance with waiting list requirements. Questioned Costs Not Applicable. Effect The Project cannot demonstrate that housing opportunities were offered fairly and consistently to eligible applicants. Failure to follow waiting list procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with HUD requirements and may result in eligible applicants being improperly bypassed. Context We noted 2 of 5 tenants selected from the continuously rolling waiting list were selected in the wrong order. In reviewing the remainder of the waiting list, we noted other applicants were offered out of order as well. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Project implement supervisory review procedures over tenant admissions, require documentation of all waiting list exceptions, and periodically monitor compliance with waiting list selection procedures. Response The Project agrees with the finding and will implement controls to ensure proper selection from the waiting list.
Contact Person – Matt Bakke, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan – The Project will review its policies and procedures over selection from waiting list. Completion Date – 12/31/26
FAC accepted this audit on April 25, 2025 — management decision was due October 25, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on August 3, 2023 — management decision was due February 3, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2022 — management decision was due October 6, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2021 — management decision was due September 28, 2021.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Dakota →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.