← Back to home

Southeastern CUSD 337Local Government

EIN: 370920599

UEI: NDWTUKV54D86

Audited by: Gorenz and Associates, Ltd.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Southeastern CUSD 3375 audit years5 findings2 repeat
5
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$990K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISGOING CONCERN$990,017 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (30 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-003

The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None. Context: The District did not document their verification that selected vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: Noncompliance with the federal award program's suspension and debarment compliance requirements could occur and not be detected and corrected timely. Cause: Written procedures are not in place to verify if vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the Child Nutrition Cluster program are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business. Recommendation: Procedures need to be implemented to ensure all vendors contracted with have not been suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business, prior to procuring their services. Management's response: The District did verify vendors on the System of Award Management website, but lack written documentation. In the future, ISBE Form 85-34 will be completed in all future bid packets.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, part 180.220 states that non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None. Context: The District did not document their verification that selected vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: Noncompliance with the federal award program's suspension and debarment compliance requirements could occur and not be detected and corrected timely. Cause: Written procedures are not in place to verify if vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the Child Nutrition Cluster program are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business. Recommendation: Procedures need to be implemented to ensure all vendors contracted with have not been suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business, prior to procuring their services. Management's response: The District did verify vendors on the System of Award Management website, but lack written documentation. In the future, ISBE Form 85-34 will be completed in all future bid packets.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Plan: Procedures will be implemented to ensure all vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the Child Nutrition Cluster program are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business, prior to procuring their services.

Prior Finding References

2024-003

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2025-004
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The same individiual is responsible for preparing and submitting monthly reimbursement claims for the Child Nutrition Program without an independent review or approval before submission. Questioned Costs: The condition has resulted in no identified questioned costs. Context: Currently one individual is responsible for preparing and submitting the monthly reimbursement claims. Effect: Meal claims could be submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education that do not accurately reflect the number of meals served. Consequently, the District could be over- or under-reimbursed by this program. Cause: Abscense of formal internal control procedures resulted in one person performing all reporting functions. Recomendation: Implement segregation of duties by requiring one person to prepare the monthly claim and a second person (e.g., supervisor) to review and approve the claim before submission. The review should be suppported with signatures or electronic approval logs. Management's Reponse: A corrective action plan will be developed and implemented. A secondary review of the meal claim to the supporting documents will be performed before the meal claim is submitted.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303 - Internal Controls and the OMB Complaince Supplement: Child Nutrition Cluster, Reporting - The District is required to have internal controls, including segregation of duties, over reporting of monthly reimbursement claims. Condition: The same individiual is responsible for preparing and submitting monthly reimbursement claims for the Child Nutrition Program without an independent review or approval before submission. Questioned Costs: The condition has resulted in no identified questioned costs. Context: Currently one individual is responsible for preparing and submitting the monthly reimbursement claims. Effect: Meal claims could be submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education that do not accurately reflect the number of meals served. Consequently, the District could be over- or under-reimbursed by this program. Cause: Abscense of formal internal control procedures resulted in one person performing all reporting functions. Recomendation: Implement segregation of duties by requiring one person to prepare the monthly claim and a second person (e.g., supervisor) to review and approve the claim before submission. The review should be suppported with signatures or electronic approval logs. Management's Reponse: A corrective action plan will be developed and implemented. A secondary review of the meal claim to the supporting documents will be performed before the meal claim is submitted.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The same individual is responsible for preparing and submitting monthly reimbursement claims for the Child Nutrition Program without an independent review or approval prior to submission. Plan: A second person (Superintendent) compares the meal counts in the claim to the SDS daily meal count reports, monthly participation summary, eligibility rosters (free, reduced, paid) and USDA reimbursement rates. The reviewer will then sign and date a reconciliation sheet before submission.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,166,946 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

2024-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None. Context: The District did not document their verification that selected vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: Noncompliance with the federal award program's suspension and debarment compliance requirements could occur and not be detected and corrected timely. Cause: Written procedures are not in place to verify if vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the Child Nutrition Cluster program are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business. Recommendation: Procedures need to be implemented to ensure all vendors contracted with have not been suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business, prior to procuring their services. Management's response: The District did verify vendors on the System of Award Management website, but lack written documentation. In the future, ISBE Form 85-34 will be completed in all future bid packets.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, part 180.220 states that non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None. Context: The District did not document their verification that selected vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: Noncompliance with the federal award program's suspension and debarment compliance requirements could occur and not be detected and corrected timely. Cause: Written procedures are not in place to verify if vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the Child Nutrition Cluster program are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business. Recommendation: Procedures need to be implemented to ensure all vendors contracted with have not been suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business, prior to procuring their services. Management's response: The District did verify vendors on the System of Award Management website, but lack written documentation. In the future, ISBE Form 85-34 will be completed in all future bid packets.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Plan: Procedures will be implemented to ensure all vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the Child Nutrition Cluster program are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business, prior to procuring their services. Management's response: The District did verify vendors on the System for Award Management website, but lack written documentation. In the future, ISBE Form 85-34 will be completed in all future bid packets.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,892,222 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,636,531 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2022 — management decision was due May 15, 2023.

2022-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2021-003

Effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that an adequate segregation of duties over the accounting function exists. Responsibilities for authorizing, approving, executing and recording transactions in the general ledger should be segregated between two or more individuals. Questioned Costs: None Context: One employee is responsible for most aspects of the cash receipts, cash disbursements and payroll functions. This individual is also responsible for recording these transactions in the general ledger and signing checks. Effect: This condition increases the possibility that errors or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Cause: Due to the small size of the District and economic constraints, it is not practical to hire additional personnel to further segregate duties over the accounting functions. Duties have been assigned based on the experience and schedules of office personnel. Recommendation: When this condition exists, the Superintendent?s and Board of Education's close oversight and review of accounting information on a regular basis is the best means of preventing or detecting errors or fraud. We also recommend that all checks be reviewed and signed by the Superintendent rather than the bookkeeper. Management's response: Due to the small size of the District, it is not practical to hire additional personnel solely for the purpose of achieving an ideal segregation of duties over the accounting function. Some segregation of duties has occurred as an outside individual has been contracted to perform the monthly bank reconciliations. In addition, the Superintendent will review and sign all checks.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Southeastern CUSD No. 337 26-034-3370-26 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ending June 30, 2022 FINDING NUMBER: 2022-003 2. THIS FINDING IS: Repeat from Prior year Year originally reported? 2012 Federal Program Name and Year: All federal programs Project No.: Various 5. CFDA No.: Various Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education Federal Agency: US Dept of Education, US Dept of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Reporting - Effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that an adequate segregation of duties over the accounting function exists. Responsibilities for authorizing, approving, executing and recording transactions in the general ledger should be segregated between two or more individuals. Condition: Effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that an adequate segregation of duties over the accounting function exists. Responsibilities for authorizing, approving, executing and recording transactions in the general ledger should be segregated between two or more individuals. Questioned Costs: None Context: One employee is responsible for most aspects of the cash receipts, cash disbursements and payroll functions. This individual is also responsible for recording these transactions in the general ledger and signing checks. Effect: This condition increases the possibility that errors or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Cause: Due to the small size of the District and economic constraints, it is not practical to hire additional personnel to further segregate duties over the accounting functions. Duties have been assigned based on the experience and schedules of office personnel. Recommendation: When this condition exists, the Superintendent?s and Board of Education's close oversight and review of accounting information on a regular basis is the best means of preventing or detecting errors or fraud. We also recommend that all checks be reviewed and signed by the Superintendent rather than the bookkeeper. Management's response: Due to the small size of the District, it is not practical to hire additional personnel solely for the purpose of achieving an ideal segregation of duties over the accounting function. Some segregation of duties has occurred as an outside individual has been contracted to perform the monthly bank reconciliations. In addition, the Superintendent will review and sign all checks.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The District has one office personnel that is involved in the accounting function. Therefore, the District does not have an adequate segregation of duties over accounting transactions as the employee is responsible for initiating and recording transactions in the general ledger as well as performing reconciliations. There were 2 errors in calculating payroll benefits charged to the grant that were not discovered and corrected by District personnel. Plan: Due to the small size of the District, it is not practical to hire additional personnel solely for the purpose of achieving an ideal segregation of duties over the accounting function. The Superintendent and the Board of Education will review and closely monitor the accounting information on a regular basis. Anticipated Date of Completion: Ongoing Name of Contact Person: D. Todd Fox, Superintendent Management Response: We agree with the finding.

Prior Finding References

2021-003

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,497,138 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2021 — management decision was due May 17, 2022.

2021-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that an adequate segregation of duties over the accounting function exists. Responsibilities for authorizing, approving, executing and recording transactions in the general ledger should be segregated between two or more individuals. 10. Questioned Costs: None 11. Context One employee is responsible for most aspects of the cash receipts, cash disbursements and payroll functions. This individual is also responsible for recording these transactions in the general ledger and signing checks. 12. Effect This condition increases the possibility that errors or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis. 13. Cause Due to the small size of the District and economic constraints, it is not practical to hire additional personnel to further segregate duties over the accounting functions. Duties have been assigned based on the experience and schedules of office personnel. 14. Recommendation When this condition exists, the Superintendent?s and Board of Education's close oversight and review of accounting information on a regular basis is the best means of preventing or detecting errors or fraud. We also recommend that all checks be reviewed and signed by the Superintendent rather than the bookkeeper. 15. Management's response Due to the small size of the District, it is not practical to hire additional personnel solely for the purpose of achieving an ideal segregation of duties over the accounting function. Some segregation of duties has occurred as an outside individual has been contracted to perform the monthly bank reconciliations. In addition, the Superintendent will review and sign all checks.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Southeastern CUSD No. 337 26-034-3370-26 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ending June 30, 2021 1. FINDING NUMBER:14 2021- 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New x Repeat from Prior year? Year originally reported? 2012 3. Federal Program Name and Year: All federal programs 4. Project No.: 5. CFDA No.: 6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education 7. Federal Agency: US Dept of Education, US Dept of Agriculture 8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Reporting - Effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that an adequate segregation of duties over the accounting function exists. Responsibilities for authorizing, approving, executing and recording transactions in the general ledger should be segregated between two or more individuals. 9. Condition: Effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that an adequate segregation of duties over the accounting function exists. Responsibilities for authorizing, approving, executing and recording transactions in the general ledger should be segregated between two or more individuals. 10. Questioned Costs: None 11. Context One employee is responsible for most aspects of the cash receipts, cash disbursements and payroll functions. This individual is also responsible for recording these transactions in the general ledger and signing checks. 12. Effect This condition increases the possibility that errors or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis. 13. Cause Due to the small size of the District and economic constraints, it is not practical to hire additional personnel to further segregate duties over the accounting functions. Duties have been assigned based on the experience and schedules of office personnel. 14. Recommendation When this condition exists, the Superintendent?s and Board of Education's close oversight and review of accounting information on a regular basis is the best means of preventing or detecting errors or fraud. We also recommend that all checks be reviewed and signed by the Superintendent rather than the bookkeeper. 15. Management's response Due to the small size of the District, it is not practical to hire additional personnel solely for the purpose of achieving an ideal segregation of duties over the accounting function. Some segregation of duties has occurred as an outside individual has been contracted to perform the monthly bank reconciliations. In addition, the Superintendent will review and sign all checks.

Corrective Action Plan

Southeastern Community Unit School District No. 337 26-034-3370-26 Corrective Action Plan For Current Year Audit Findings Year Ending June 30, 2021 Finding No: 2021-003 Condition: The District has one office personnel that is involved in the accounting function. Therefore, the District does not have an adequate segregation of duties over accounting transactions as the employee is responsible for initiating and recording transactions in the general ledger as well as performing reconciliations. Plan: Due to the small size of the District, it is not practical to hire additional personnel solely for the purpose of achieving an ideal segregation of duties over the accounting function. The Superintendent and the Board of Education will review and closely monitor the accounting information on a regular basis. Anticipated Date of Completion: Ongoing Name of Contact Person: D. Todd Fox, Superintendent Management Response: We agree with the finding.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.