EIN: 366005813
UEI: MFQMLLXLU9K1
Audited by: Crowe LLP
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2026 (174 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 25, 2024 — management decision was due May 25, 2025.
The quarterly reports that were filed did not contain all expenses related to the grant. Context: The progress report is used to track the City’s progress toward implementing community policing strategies and to collect data to gauge the effectiveness of increasing the City’s community policing capacity through COPS Office funding. There was no formal review process in place for the performance reports. The reports are completed by the Police department grant facilitator who receives input from the Police Chief or the Assistant Police Chief but no formal documentation. The Federal Financial Report is used to track the expenditures of the recipient’s award funds on a cumulative basis throughout the life of the award. The cumulative amount of the federal share of expenditures was under-reported on the quarterly reports that were filed during the fiscal year. All expenditures were not included within the total. This incorrectly calculated on the report the amount of the unobligated balance of the grant. The City resubmitted the reports when the error was identified. Questioned Cost: None Effect: The quarterly reporting understated the expenditures for the grant and overstated the unobligated balance. Cause: The preparer of the report was unaware that the amount reported for expenditures should be cumulative. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the secondary review of the reports verify that the amount being presented on the report is the cumulative amount. Additionally, we recommend that the performance report be prepared and reviewed by separate individuals and have that be formally documented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-002: Reporting Federal Program Information: Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants, ALN #16.710 Criteria: According to the grant agreement, to assist the COPS Office in monitoring and tracking the performance of the award, the City is responsible for submitting semi-annual programmatic progress reports that describe project activities during the reporting period and quarterly Federal Financial Reports using Standard Form 425 (SF-425). Condition: The quarterly reports that were filed did not contain all expenses related to the grant. Context: The progress report is used to track the City’s progress toward implementing community policing strategies and to collect data to gauge the effectiveness of increasing the City’s community policing capacity through COPS Office funding. There was no formal review process in place for the performance reports. The reports are completed by the Police department grant facilitator who receives input from the Police Chief or the Assistant Police Chief but no formal documentation. The Federal Financial Report is used to track the expenditures of the recipient’s award funds on a cumulative basis throughout the life of the award. The cumulative amount of the federal share of expenditures was under-reported on the quarterly reports that were filed during the fiscal year. All expenditures were not included within the total. This incorrectly calculated on the report the amount of the unobligated balance of the grant. The City resubmitted the reports when the error was identified. Questioned Cost: None Effect: The quarterly reporting understated the expenditures for the grant and overstated the unobligated balance. Cause: The preparer of the report was unaware that the amount reported for expenditures should be cumulative. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the secondary review of the reports verify that the amount being presented on the report is the cumulative amount. Additionally, we recommend that the performance report be prepared and reviewed by separate individuals and have that be formally documented.
The City will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Furthermore, the City will adequately document claimed expenditures that are consistent with the terms and conditions of each grant agreement. The City will have reports prepared and reviewed by separate individuals.
FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2023 — management decision was due January 24, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on August 18, 2022 — management decision was due February 18, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2021 — management decision was due October 28, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2020 — management decision was due December 4, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2019 — management decision was due July 30, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2018 — management decision was due September 13, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on May 16, 2017 — management decision was due November 16, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
