EIN: 366004869
UEI: EKNCEZ3KU633
Audited by: Eccezion
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 10, 2026 (81 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2024 — management decision was due May 12, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2024 — management decision was due July 10, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2022 — management decision was due June 11, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2022 — management decision was due July 3, 2022.
The District did not consult with the private school in their boundary regarding equitable share of funding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴The District did not consult with the private school in their boundary regarding equitable share of funding.
District will do their due diligence and make sure that compliance requirements are met in the future.
FAC accepted this audit on October 13, 2020 — management decision was due April 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on October 7, 2019 — management decision was due April 7, 2020.
Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) The District is required to an applicant's eligibility for free and reduced lunch based on the income information provided by the family, and the income guidelines provided by the Department of Agriculture. Condition National School Lunch program eligibilty determination was incorrect for two students. Questioned Costs Not able to be calculated. Context Two students were improperly classified. Effect Students were deemed to be eligible for free instead of reduced and reduced instead of free, respectively. Cause Clerical errors were made in determining the eligibility. Recommendation The District should ensure that student eligibility determination is done correctly. Management's response Management will make sure that student eligibility determinations are reviewed more carefully.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) The District is required to an applicant's eligibility for free and reduced lunch based on the income information provided by the family, and the income guidelines provided by the Department of Agriculture. Condition National School Lunch program eligibilty determination was incorrect for two students. Questioned Costs Not able to be calculated. Context Two students were improperly classified. Effect Students were deemed to be eligible for free instead of reduced and reduced instead of free, respectively. Cause Clerical errors were made in determining the eligibility. Recommendation The District should ensure that student eligibility determination is done correctly. Management's response Management will make sure that student eligibility determinations are reviewed more carefully.
Condition: NSLP confirmation review and verification tracking forms were not signed and dated by the verifying official. Plan: Management will set procedures in place to ensure that the verification tracking is completed and signed by the verifying official
Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) The District is required to have a verifying official sign and date the confirmation review and tracking forms. Condition NSLP confirmation review and verification tracking forms were not signed and dated by the verifying official. Questioned Costs Not able to be calculated. Context The verifying official is required to sign and date the confirmation review and tracking forms. The forms were reviewed but the verifying official did not leave a physical signature or date on the forms after reviewing them. Effect The verification process did not meet the compliance requirements. Cause Procedures were not followed to ensure the forms were reviewed and signed by the verifying official. Recommendation Procedures should be followed to ensure verification tracking is completed and signed by the verifying official. Management's response The District will make sure procedures will be followed to ensure that the verification tracking is completed and signed by the verifying official.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) The District is required to have a verifying official sign and date the confirmation review and tracking forms. Condition NSLP confirmation review and verification tracking forms were not signed and dated by the verifying official. Questioned Costs Not able to be calculated. Context The verifying official is required to sign and date the confirmation review and tracking forms. The forms were reviewed but the verifying official did not leave a physical signature or date on the forms after reviewing them. Effect The verification process did not meet the compliance requirements. Cause Procedures were not followed to ensure the forms were reviewed and signed by the verifying official. Recommendation Procedures should be followed to ensure verification tracking is completed and signed by the verifying official. Management's response The District will make sure procedures will be followed to ensure that the verification tracking is completed and signed by the verifying official.
Condition: NSLP eligibility determination was incorrect for two students (status was free instead of reduced and reduced instead of free respectively). Plan: Management will make sure that student eligibility determinations are reviewed more carefully.
FAC accepted this audit on December 2, 2018 — management decision was due June 2, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2017 — management decision was due March 25, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2016 — management decision was due March 28, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
