← Back to home

MINOOKA COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 201Local Government

EIN: 366004585

UEI: FG6BE2NZEP58

Audited by: WERMER, ROGERS, DORAN & RUZON, LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

MINOOKA COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 20110 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$2.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION$2,624,979 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 12, 2026 (60 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,887,733 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 17, 2025 — management decision was due August 17, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$4,200,104 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2024 — management decision was due August 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$6,450,834 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2022 — management decision was due May 17, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,721,540 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 14, 2021 — management decision was due April 14, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,539,202 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 28, 2020 — management decision was due April 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,311,462 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-002
Eligibility
REPEAT OF 2018-002QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

During our audit, we noted one instance where the District used improper income conversion for comparison to the current income eligibility guidelines in order to verify income for eligibility for a student to qualify to receive reduced-cost meals as a participant in the National School Lunch Program. Questioned Costs: $400.20 (174 attendance days times $2.30 per day - the difference between reduced and paid lunch). Context: We selected four applicants for verification testing. Based on our inspections and calculations, we noted one applicant where there was an improper conversion of income for verifying income for eligibility. Effect: As a result, one student was given reduced lunch that may have been eligible. Cause: The District's procedures to recheck if income is being compared to the current income eligibility guidelines properly did not uncover the error. Recommendation: We recommend the District have another employee thoroughly recheck the income conversion process for verifying income for eligibility. Management's response: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to have an employee recheck the income conversion process for verifying income for eligibility.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirements: Districts are required to select 3% of eligible students for a verification process of eligibility for free or reduced lunches. In performing these tests, verification should include determination of income eligibility by comparing the household size and the total household gross earned income to the current income eligibility guidelines. Condition: During our audit, we noted one instance where the District used improper income conversion for comparison to the current income eligibility guidelines in order to verify income for eligibility for a student to qualify to receive reduced-cost meals as a participant in the National School Lunch Program. Questioned Costs: $400.20 (174 attendance days times $2.30 per day - the difference between reduced and paid lunch). Context: We selected four applicants for verification testing. Based on our inspections and calculations, we noted one applicant where there was an improper conversion of income for verifying income for eligibility. Effect: As a result, one student was given reduced lunch that may have been eligible. Cause: The District's procedures to recheck if income is being compared to the current income eligibility guidelines properly did not uncover the error. Recommendation: We recommend the District have another employee thoroughly recheck the income conversion process for verifying income for eligibility. Management's response: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to have an employee recheck the income conversion process for verifying income for eligibility.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: During our audit, we noted one instance where the District used improper income conversion for comparison to the current eligibility guidelines in order to verify income for eligibility for a student to qualify to receive reduced lunch as a participant in the National School Lunch Program. Plan: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to have an employee recheck the income conversion process for verifying income for eligibility.

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,291,050 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2018 — management decision was due May 1, 2019.

2018-002
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,250,199 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2017 — management decision was due May 7, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,171,304 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2016 — management decision was due April 17, 2017.

2016-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.