← Back to home

Chicago Heights School District 170Local Government

EIN: 366004384

UEI: KDPRY9N9KEH4

Audited by: Sikich CPA LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Chicago Heights School District 17010 audit years6 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$7.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$7,348,685 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 10, 2026 (39 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$13,925,125 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2025 — management decision was due October 16, 2025.

2024-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Compliance Requirements: A., B., L. Internal Controls over Allowability of Activities and Costs as well as Reporting are achieved when there is evidence of an independent review, such as initials or a signature, of daily meal count sheets by supervisory personnel at individual schools. Condition - Out of 88 daily meal counts reviewed, 16 (18%) did not feature an approving signature or initials by supervisory personnel. Addtionally, 6 (7%) of the 88 daily meal counts reviewed did not match the amount of claims submitted for reimbursement. In total, a net amount of 15 less meals were requested for reimbursement than what was reported on the daily meal counts. Questioned Costs - N/A. Context - Daily meal count documentation should be signed by a supervisory level employee outside of the data entry process to ensure accuracy and reasonableness of the amounts being reported for grant reimbursements. Effect - Potential errors in reporting to funding agencies may not be caught leading to potential improper or inaccurate reimbursements to the District. Cause - Failure to implement a control structure with appropriate significations of approval/review of daily count sheet documentation prior to requesting reimbursement for meals served as well as assurances that such amounts requested are accurate. Recommendation - The District should institute a control structure where daily count documents are reviewed by supervisory personnel not involved with data entry of the claims. Signification of such a review should be documented through a signature or initials. Additionally, the control structure should add steps to ensure that all documentation used to request reimbursement has been accurately entered by reconciling the amount requested to the amount documented. Management's response - The District recognizes the importance of supervisor review in ensuring the accuracy of meal count documentation and reimbursement claims. To address this, the District will implement a standardized review process across all schools, requiring supervisory personnel to sign or initial daily meal count sheets. In addition, we will institute a reconciliation step to verify that reported counts align with reimbursement claims. Training will be provided to ensure compliance with these procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Compliance Requirements: A., B., L. Internal Controls over Allowability of Activities and Costs as well as Reporting are achieved when there is evidence of an independent review, such as initials or a signature, of daily meal count sheets by supervisory personnel at individual schools. Condition - Out of 88 daily meal counts reviewed, 16 (18%) did not feature an approving signature or initials by supervisory personnel. Addtionally, 6 (7%) of the 88 daily meal counts reviewed did not match the amount of claims submitted for reimbursement. In total, a net amount of 15 less meals were requested for reimbursement than what was reported on the daily meal counts. Questioned Costs - N/A. Context - Daily meal count documentation should be signed by a supervisory level employee outside of the data entry process to ensure accuracy and reasonableness of the amounts being reported for grant reimbursements. Effect - Potential errors in reporting to funding agencies may not be caught leading to potential improper or inaccurate reimbursements to the District. Cause - Failure to implement a control structure with appropriate significations of approval/review of daily count sheet documentation prior to requesting reimbursement for meals served as well as assurances that such amounts requested are accurate. Recommendation - The District should institute a control structure where daily count documents are reviewed by supervisory personnel not involved with data entry of the claims. Signification of such a review should be documented through a signature or initials. Additionally, the control structure should add steps to ensure that all documentation used to request reimbursement has been accurately entered by reconciling the amount requested to the amount documented. Management's response - The District recognizes the importance of supervisor review in ensuring the accuracy of meal count documentation and reimbursement claims. To address this, the District will implement a standardized review process across all schools, requiring supervisory personnel to sign or initial daily meal count sheets. In addition, we will institute a reconciliation step to verify that reported counts align with reimbursement claims. Training will be provided to ensure compliance with these procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

The District recognizes the importance of supervisory review in ensuring the accuracy of meal count documentation and reimbursement claims. To address this, the District will implement a standardized review process across all schools requiring supervisory personnel to sign or initial daily meal count sheets. In addition, we will institute a reconciliation step to verify that reported counts align with reimbursement claims. Training will be provided to ensure compliance with these procedures. Anticipated Date of Completion: A review and determination will be completed in fiscal year 2025. Contact Person: Joe Barker, CSBO.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$12,380,324 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2024 — management decision was due February 19, 2025.

2023-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Compliance Requirements: A., B., L. Internal Controls over Allowability of Activities and Costs as well as Reporting are achieved when someone other than the requestor of the purchase or preparer of the report are reviewing the supporting documentation pertaining to each compliance area and signfying such a review with a signature. '9. Condition Out of 28 vouchers reviewed in relation to Title I expenditures, 16 did not feature an approving signature by a department head upon receipt of the goods or services, despite featuring an approved purchase order. Addtionally, out of 4 quarterly reports reviewed, 1 did not feature evidence of review and approval. '10. Questioned Costs N/A '11. Context Invoices paid with grant funding should be signed by a department head or another supervisory level employee to ensure that the purchase has been reviewed upon receipt of the goods or services and is for allowable grant activities. Additionally, copies of reports with signification of review by someone other than the preparer prior to filing should be maintained. '12. Effect Potential misuse of grant funding and errors in reporting to funding agencies may not be caught leading to potential improper reimbursements to the District. '13. Cause Failure to implement a control structure with appropriate significations of approval/review of invoices upon receipt of goods or services prior to payment and reports prior to submission to funding agencies. 14. Recommendation The District should institute a control structure where grant invoices are reviewed upon receipt of goods or services for allowable activiites and costs prior to disbursement of payment. Additionally, personnel other than the preparer should review and approve grant reports prior to submission to funding agencies. Copies of these signed reports should be retained. 15. Management's response The District will evaluate the procedures in place to ensure proper course of action is taken with respect to Title I.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Compliance Requirements: A., B., L. Internal Controls over Allowability of Activities and Costs as well as Reporting are achieved when someone other than the requestor of the purchase or preparer of the report are reviewing the supporting documentation pertaining to each compliance area and signfying such a review with a signature. '9. Condition Out of 28 vouchers reviewed in relation to Title I expenditures, 16 did not feature an approving signature by a department head upon receipt of the goods or services, despite featuring an approved purchase order. Addtionally, out of 4 quarterly reports reviewed, 1 did not feature evidence of review and approval. '10. Questioned Costs N/A '11. Context Invoices paid with grant funding should be signed by a department head or another supervisory level employee to ensure that the purchase has been reviewed upon receipt of the goods or services and is for allowable grant activities. Additionally, copies of reports with signification of review by someone other than the preparer prior to filing should be maintained. '12. Effect Potential misuse of grant funding and errors in reporting to funding agencies may not be caught leading to potential improper reimbursements to the District. '13. Cause Failure to implement a control structure with appropriate significations of approval/review of invoices upon receipt of goods or services prior to payment and reports prior to submission to funding agencies. 14. Recommendation The District should institute a control structure where grant invoices are reviewed upon receipt of goods or services for allowable activiites and costs prior to disbursement of payment. Additionally, personnel other than the preparer should review and approve grant reports prior to submission to funding agencies. Copies of these signed reports should be retained. 15. Management's response The District will evaluate the procedures in place to ensure proper course of action is taken with respect to Title I.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will evaluate the procedures in place to ensure proper course of action is taken with respect to Title I. Contact Person: Joe Barker Anticipated Date of Completion: A review and determination will be completed in fiscal year 2025.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$20,214,732 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2023 — management decision was due November 14, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$5,794,249 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 22, 2022 — management decision was due May 22, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$5,418,003 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2021 — management decision was due July 5, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$6,113,163 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$6,200,778 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2019 — management decision was due July 29, 2019.

2018-005
Equipment & Real Property
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$5,991,395 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2018 — management decision was due July 9, 2018.

2017-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$5,843,534 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2017 — management decision was due July 29, 2017.

2016-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-004

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-004

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2016-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.