Indian Town Home AssociationNon-Profit

EIN: 364294861

UEI: C6JXX7L1GWH3

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Indian Town Home Association10 audit years5 findings
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$1,925,235 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 11, 2026 (18 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Segregation of Duties See Section II – Financial Statement Findings Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract Assistance Listing #: 14.157 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties See Section II – Financial Statement Findings Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract Assistance Listing #: 14.157 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance

Corrective Action Plan

Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing– FAL No. 14.157 Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract – FAL No. 14.157 Recommendation: When a lack of segregation of duties exists, management’s and the board’s close supervision and review of accounting information are the best means of preventing or detecting errors and irregularities. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management will continue to monitor monthly financial results and accounting information as correction is not practical. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Medearis Planned completion date for corrective action plan: In process

About Eligibility →
2025-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

We noted a refund was provided to a tenant 32 days after the tenant’s move-out date. Questioned Costs: None Context: We noted a refund was provided to a tenant 32 days after the tenant’s move-out date. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with HUD requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure move-out notifications are provided to the accounting office in a timely manner to ensure the tenant's security deposit is processed and refunded within 30 days of the move out date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will process the related move-out supporting documentation in a timely manner that will allow for the processing of the security deposit payment within 30 days of the actual move-out date.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Security Deposits Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract Assistance Listing #: 14.157 Type of Finding: • Other Matter and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: HUD requires refunds to be disbursed to the former tenant and in the appropriate amount within 30 days of move-out. If no refund is given, the tenant should received an itemized listing of any unpaid rent, damages to the unit, and any estimated cost for repair. Condition: We noted a refund was provided to a tenant 32 days after the tenant’s move-out date. Questioned Costs: None Context: We noted a refund was provided to a tenant 32 days after the tenant’s move-out date. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with HUD requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure move-out notifications are provided to the accounting office in a timely manner to ensure the tenant's security deposit is processed and refunded within 30 days of the move out date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will process the related move-out supporting documentation in a timely manner that will allow for the processing of the security deposit payment within 30 days of the actual move-out date.

Corrective Action Plan

Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing– FAL No. 14.157 Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract – FAL No. 14.157 Recommendation: The Organization should ensure move-out notifications are provided to the accounting office in a timely manner to ensure the tenant's security deposit is processed and refunded within 30 days of the move out date. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management will process the related move-out notifications in a timely manner and ensure future security deposits are refunded within the required timeline. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Medearis Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 30, 2026

About Eligibility →
2025-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

We noted that two disbursements did not have supporting invoices. Questioned Costs: None Context: During the fiscal year there was a change in personnel and during that transition two invoices were misplaced. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The absence of supporting documentation for disbursements increases the risk of financial misstatement and may lead to unauthorized or inappropriate transactions. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen their record retention policy to ensure that proper support for disbursements is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will maintain invoices for all disbursements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract Assistance Listing #: 14.157 Type of Finding: • Other Matter and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR 200, all disbursements must be supported by appropriate documentation to ensure the accuracy and reliability of compliance with applicable regulations. Condition: We noted that two disbursements did not have supporting invoices. Questioned Costs: None Context: During the fiscal year there was a change in personnel and during that transition two invoices were misplaced. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The absence of supporting documentation for disbursements increases the risk of financial misstatement and may lead to unauthorized or inappropriate transactions. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen their record retention policy to ensure that proper support for disbursements is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will maintain invoices for all disbursements.

Corrective Action Plan

Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing– FAL No. 14.157 Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract – FAL No. 14.157 Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen their record retention policy to ensure that proper support for disbursements is maintained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will maintain invoices for all disbursements Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Medearis Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 30, 2026 If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call Jennifer Medearis at 309-356-1112.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,917,947 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2025 — management decision was due August 13, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

There is not an ideal segregation of duties among personnel involved in the accounting function. A lack of proper segregation of duties could allow errors or irregularities to occur and go undetected. This condition is inherent in operations which, for sound economic conditions, must function with a small number of office personnel, and correction of this condition would require the employment of additional office personnel. Consequently, corrective action may not be practical. Criteria or Specific Requirement: A proper segregation of duties is an important component of a system of strong internal controls and should be implemented, if possible. Cause: For sound economic reasons, the Organization and the management company must function with a small number of office personnel, and correction of this condition would require the employment of additional office personnel. Consequently, corrective action may not be practical. Effect: A lack of segregation of duties increases the risk that errors or fraud may occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: When this condition exists, management’s and the board’s close supervision and review of accounting information are the best means of preventing or detecting errors and irregularities. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree and will continue to monitor monthly financial results and accounting information as correction is not practical.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract Assistance Listing #: 14.157 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition: There is not an ideal segregation of duties among personnel involved in the accounting function. A lack of proper segregation of duties could allow errors or irregularities to occur and go undetected. This condition is inherent in operations which, for sound economic conditions, must function with a small number of office personnel, and correction of this condition would require the employment of additional office personnel. Consequently, corrective action may not be practical. Criteria or Specific Requirement: A proper segregation of duties is an important component of a system of strong internal controls and should be implemented, if possible. Cause: For sound economic reasons, the Organization and the management company must function with a small number of office personnel, and correction of this condition would require the employment of additional office personnel. Consequently, corrective action may not be practical. Effect: A lack of segregation of duties increases the risk that errors or fraud may occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: When this condition exists, management’s and the board’s close supervision and review of accounting information are the best means of preventing or detecting errors and irregularities. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree and will continue to monitor monthly financial results and accounting information as correction is not practical.

Corrective Action Plan

Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing– FAL No. 14.157 Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract – FAL No. 14.157 Recommendation: When a lack of segregation of duties exists, management’s and the board’s close supervision and review of accounting information are the best means of preventing or detecting errors and irregularities. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management will continue to monitor monthly financial results and accounting information as correction is not practical. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tammy Neuhalfen Planned completion date for corrective action plan: In process

About Reporting →
2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Organization had surplus cash at September 30, 2023 of $39,374. This surplus cash was not deposited into the residual receipts reserve account within 90 days from September 30, 2023. The deposit was made on July 31, 2024. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The HUD regulatory agreement requires any surplus cash to be deposited into the residual receipts account within 90 days of year end. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the HUD regulatory agreement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure any surplus cash is deposited within 90 days of year end. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree and will ensure future surplus cash is deposited within the required timeline.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract Assistance Listing #: 14.157 Type of Finding: • Other Matter and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Condition: The Organization had surplus cash at September 30, 2023 of $39,374. This surplus cash was not deposited into the residual receipts reserve account within 90 days from September 30, 2023. The deposit was made on July 31, 2024. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The HUD regulatory agreement requires any surplus cash to be deposited into the residual receipts account within 90 days of year end. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the HUD regulatory agreement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure any surplus cash is deposited within 90 days of year end. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree and will ensure future surplus cash is deposited within the required timeline.

Corrective Action Plan

Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Mortgage Financing– FAL No. 14.157 Section 202 Project Rental Assistance Contract – FAL No. 14.157 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure any surplus cash is deposited within 90 days of year end. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will ensure future surplus cash is deposited within the required timeline. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tammy Neuhalfen Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 30, 2025

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,926,150 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2024 — management decision was due August 7, 2024.

FY 2022-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,914,388 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2023 — management decision was due August 7, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,925,439 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2022 — management decision was due August 10, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,931,032 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2021 — management decision was due August 2, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,926,523 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2020 — management decision was due July 15, 2020.

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,926,192 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2019 — management decision was due July 14, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,919,627 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2018 — management decision was due July 8, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,914,654 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2017 — management decision was due July 10, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.