EIN: 363817743
UEI: CX3LW7N2LNQ5
Audited by: Porte Brown LLC
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 8, 2026 (56 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 26, 2024 — management decision was due May 26, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2024 — management decision was due August 6, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2022 — management decision was due June 1, 2023.
Cost allocations for salaries, including federal award programs, are not consistently supported by employee timesheets or other similar documentation. Effect : Because a reconciliation process is not in place to agree to personnel activity reports to cost allocations, it is possible that an employee's time may be inappropriately allocated amongst program and non program activities, including federal award programs. Cause : There are no procedures in place for tracking of employee time spent on federal programs on a cost reimbursement basis. Context : During our testing of current year expenditures, we sampled 31 payroll expenditures totaling $67,195 and identified 7 transactions totalling $13,975 in which the allocated amount was not supported by timecards maintained. Recommendation : We recommend that individuals who are written into a grant agreement as a cost reimbursement and who work in different program initiatives, track their time and submit timecards or time allocation summaries documenting their time spent on the various programs. We recommend then that the accounting department reconcile those reports and ensure that the pay period allocation is in agreement with the submitted reports. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions : The Agency recognizes this finding and notes that this occurrence resulted from additional emergency additional funding provided by funders in a different payment structure than other grants received. Going forward with any new grants that are cost reimbursement based and where individuals are only partially allocated to the program, a staff allocation tracking will be implemented for said employees.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that cost allocations of staff time accurately represent the correct allocation of employee-related costs based on the time spent by applicable employees. Condition: Cost allocations for salaries, including federal award programs, are not consistently supported by employee timesheets or other similar documentation. Effect : Because a reconciliation process is not in place to agree to personnel activity reports to cost allocations, it is possible that an employee's time may be inappropriately allocated amongst program and non program activities, including federal award programs. Cause : There are no procedures in place for tracking of employee time spent on federal programs on a cost reimbursement basis. Context : During our testing of current year expenditures, we sampled 31 payroll expenditures totaling $67,195 and identified 7 transactions totalling $13,975 in which the allocated amount was not supported by timecards maintained. Recommendation : We recommend that individuals who are written into a grant agreement as a cost reimbursement and who work in different program initiatives, track their time and submit timecards or time allocation summaries documenting their time spent on the various programs. We recommend then that the accounting department reconcile those reports and ensure that the pay period allocation is in agreement with the submitted reports. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions : The Agency recognizes this finding and notes that this occurrence resulted from additional emergency additional funding provided by funders in a different payment structure than other grants received. Going forward with any new grants that are cost reimbursement based and where individuals are only partially allocated to the program, a staff allocation tracking will be implemented for said employees.
The Agency recognizes this finding and notes that this occurrence resulted from additional emergency additional funding provided by funders in a different payment structure than other grants received. Going forward with any new grants that are cost reimbursement based and where individuals are only partially allocated to the program, a staff allocation tracking will be implemented for said employees.
FAC accepted this audit on October 18, 2021 — management decision was due April 18, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2020 — management decision was due May 9, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2018 — management decision was due April 30, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2017 — management decision was due April 29, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2017 — management decision was due July 6, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.