← Back to home

Indiana Legal Services, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 356059654

UEI: WAGRFK8YJJJ7

Audited by: Crowe LLP

Oversight agency: 09 [Legal Services Corporation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Indiana Legal Services, Inc.10 audit years16 findings8 repeat
10
Audit Years
16
Total Findings
8
Repeat Findings
$13M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$13,043,337 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 15, 2026 (70 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,242,519 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2025 — management decision was due December 30, 2025.

2024-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Time recorded by attorneys and paralegals was not entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations and ILS’ time keeping policy. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 22 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2024. The test found of the 22 selections, there were 2 selections in which time posted by attorneys and paralegals fell outside of ILS’s contemporaneous timekeeping policy of 2 business days Effect: Noncompliance with timely time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations and ILS policy. We found no indications that during the test ILS participated in any actual case or matter that violated LSC restrictions or prohibitions. Cause: Attorneys and paralegals lack of timeliness of entering time into the Legal File system. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend ILS continue to train employees on the importance of timekeeping to ensure compliance with ILS policy and LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-001 – Timekeeping Requirements Information on the federal program: Basic Field, Migrant Farmworkers Project, COVID Response Grant (CFDA Number: 09.515030) – Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Time spent by attorneys and paralegals must be documented by time records which record the amount of time spent on each case, matter, or supporting activity (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)). Time records must be created contemporaneously and account for time in increments not greater than one-quarter of an hour which comprise all of the efforts of the attorneys and paralegals for which compensation is paid (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)(1)). Condition: Time recorded by attorneys and paralegals was not entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations and ILS’ time keeping policy. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 22 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2024. The test found of the 22 selections, there were 2 selections in which time posted by attorneys and paralegals fell outside of ILS’s contemporaneous timekeeping policy of 2 business days Effect: Noncompliance with timely time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations and ILS policy. We found no indications that during the test ILS participated in any actual case or matter that violated LSC restrictions or prohibitions. Cause: Attorneys and paralegals lack of timeliness of entering time into the Legal File system. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend ILS continue to train employees on the importance of timekeeping to ensure compliance with ILS policy and LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-01 This finding states that two ILS employees failed to record time in our timekeeping system in the manner required by LSC timekeeping requirements and ILS personnel policy 7.02. ILS agrees that these violations took place. The auditors identified two different problems. In one case, an employee entered time before the work was performed. ILS’s policy allows time to be entered in advance only for leave time, training, and similar events, not time worked on cases or outreach. The auditors’ discovery led us to find a few other instances – not widespread – of early time entry. As a result, we educated employees about our policies and developed a report that notifies managers when early time entries occur. These changes adequately address the issue of early time entry. The other issue arose from an employee who was not entering time information in our system at all. ILS has multiple methods in place to ensure that employees promptly record their time in our system. These methods include notification to employees when their timekeeping is untimely and notice to their managers when an employee’s timekeeping is untimely. Part 7.06 of the ILS personnel policies mandates discipline for employees who do not comply with timekeeping requirements. ILS believes that these procedures do as much as possible to ensure compliance with timekeeping requirements. In the situation cited in this finding, the employee was subjected to discipline for his failure of timely timekeeping, and he is no longer employed by ILS.

About Other →
2024-002
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

ILS did not maintain a formal tracking system for matching funds related to its various aging grants. As a result, ILS determined that it was not in compliance with the 15% matching requirement as outlined in the applicable 2024 Compliance Supplement. Questioned Cost: None. Context: During our review of ILS’s 2024 summary matching contributions file, it was determined that of the 14 aging grants with activity during the year, 7 did not meet the 15% matching requirement as specified in the applicable Compliance Supplement. Effect: Noncompliance with the matching requirements could lead to a request for the return of nonmatched funds, and impact ILS eligibility for future funding. Cause: The noncompliance resulted from a lack of ongoing, year-round monitoring of matching contributions for each aging grant. Management did not have processes in place to ensure that required match amounts were tracked and met consistently throughout the grant period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that ILS implement a formal system to monitor matching contributions for all aging grants on an ongoing basis. This should include the development of tracking tools and internal controls to ensure that match requirements are met consistently throughout the grant period. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-002 – Matching Requirements Information on the federal program: Special Programs For The Aging – Title III, Part B—Grants For Supportive Services and Senior Centers (ALN: 93.044) – Aging Cluster Criteria: All services, whether provided by the State Agency, an Area Agency, or other service providers (excluding any ombudsman services provided under the authority of 42 USC 3024 (d)(1)(D)) must be funded with a nonfederal match of at least 15 percent. One-third of the required 15 percent match must come from state sources (42 USC 3029 (b)(2)). This percentage must be met on a statewide basis. Funds for ombudsman services provided under the authority of 42 USC 3024 (d)(1)(B) are not required to be matched (42 USC 3024 (d)(1)(D); 45 CFR section 1321.47). Condition: ILS did not maintain a formal tracking system for matching funds related to its various aging grants. As a result, ILS determined that it was not in compliance with the 15% matching requirement as outlined in the applicable 2024 Compliance Supplement. Questioned Cost: None. Context: During our review of ILS’s 2024 summary matching contributions file, it was determined that of the 14 aging grants with activity during the year, 7 did not meet the 15% matching requirement as specified in the applicable Compliance Supplement. Effect: Noncompliance with the matching requirements could lead to a request for the return of nonmatched funds, and impact ILS eligibility for future funding. Cause: The noncompliance resulted from a lack of ongoing, year-round monitoring of matching contributions for each aging grant. Management did not have processes in place to ensure that required match amounts were tracked and met consistently throughout the grant period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that ILS implement a formal system to monitor matching contributions for all aging grants on an ongoing basis. This should include the development of tracking tools and internal controls to ensure that match requirements are met consistently throughout the grant period. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-02 This finding states that ILS did not maintain a formal tracking system for matching funds relating to its aging grants under Title III of the Older Americans Act, and that as a result ILS cannot show that the matching requirement was met in certain cases (ILS receives at least 14 grants under this law, each requiring a 15% match). ILS does not dispute that it lacked a system to formally tracking matching of these grants in 2024. In 2025, ILS will institute a system to monitor the 15% match requirement. Each month, the ILS Grant Reporting Specialist who creates and sends claims to grantors under this program will track the percentage of matching on the same tracking sheet. Also, at the monthly meeting including grants staff and finance department staff, the matching amounts will be verified and reconciled with the amounts allocated to each grant. The CFO will be responsible for ensuring that the reconciliation occurs.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2023-12-31

$13,897,664 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2024 — management decision was due December 12, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

$12,427,955 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2023 — management decision was due December 21, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

$11,945,104 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2022 — management decision was due December 22, 2022.

2021-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-004

Time recorded by a attorneys and paralegals was not entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations and ILS? time keeping policy. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 15 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2021. The test found of the 15 selections, there was 1 selection that had a total of 1 daily entry in which time posted by attorneys and paralegals fell outside of ILS?s contemporaneous timekeeping policy of 2 business days. Effect: Noncompliance with timely time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations and ILS policy. We found no indications that during the test that ILS participated in any actual case or matter that violated LSC restrictions or prohibitions. Cause: Attorneys and paralegals lack of timeliness of entering time into the Legal File system. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2020-04. Recommendation: We recommend ILS continue to train employees on the importance of timekeeping to ensure compliance with ILS policy and LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Section III ? Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2021-003 ? Timekeeping Requirements Information on the federal program: Basic Field, Migrant Farmworkers Project, COVID Response Grant (CFDA Number: 09.515030) ? Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Time spent by attorneys and paralegals must be documented by time records which record the amount of time spent on each case, matter, or supporting activity (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)). Time records must be created contemporaneously and account for time in increments not greater than one-quarter of an hour which comprise all of the efforts of the attorneys and paralegals for which compensation is paid (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)(1)). Condition: Time recorded by a attorneys and paralegals was not entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations and ILS? time keeping policy. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 15 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2021. The test found of the 15 selections, there was 1 selection that had a total of 1 daily entry in which time posted by attorneys and paralegals fell outside of ILS?s contemporaneous timekeeping policy of 2 business days. Effect: Noncompliance with timely time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations and ILS policy. We found no indications that during the test that ILS participated in any actual case or matter that violated LSC restrictions or prohibitions. Cause: Attorneys and paralegals lack of timeliness of entering time into the Legal File system. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2020-04. Recommendation: We recommend ILS continue to train employees on the importance of timekeeping to ensure compliance with ILS policy and LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2021-003 ILS acknowledges that 1 of 858 examined time entries did not meet our then-existing internal deadline for timeliness (this finding represents one-tenth of one percent of the time entries examined). This result is a substantial improvement over 2020 (when we suggested a higher error rate was due in part to effects of the pandemic). Because of a change in Legal Services Corporation rules, ILS made changes to its timekeeping policy implemented January 1, 2022. In response to LSC?s change, ILS now requires employees to complete their time entries for a pay period by close-of-business on the day when managers are required to verify hours worked for that pay period, usually 4 business days after the last day of the pay period. Separately, employees have until 2 business days after the last day of the pay period to correct any errors they find when reviewing time worked for the pay period. Additionally, managers routinely run a variety of reports in ILS?s timekeeping system to detect timekeeping errors in time for those errors to be corrected in a timely manner. ILS?s deputy director, Rakuya Trice, will be responsible for implementing these plans of correction.

Prior Finding References

2020-004

About Other →

FY 2020-12-31

$9,004,525 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 21, 2021 — management decision was due March 21, 2022.

2020-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-003QUESTIONED COSTS

LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers are utilized by ILS to transfer LSC funds to other LSC eligible activities once non-LSC funds for the activity are fully expended but do not support all expenditures of the activities. During the audit, we noted instances in which fund transfers were made and not deemed necessary. Questioned Cost: $121,336 Context: ILS utilizes LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers on an annual basis to transfer LSC funds to LSC eligible activities not fully funded by non-LSC revenue sources. During our testing of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers, we noted four instances in which transfers, in the amounts of $122,388, $18,430, $2,733, and $1,328, were made to other funds on the general ledger which were not deemed necessary as the funds had current year revenues in excess of current year expenses resulting in a total reduction of LSC expenses of $144,879. We also noted a clerical error in supplementary schedule prepared by management to support the LSC fund transfers which resulted in a $47,533 reduction to the LSC funds transferred. We noted one instance in which additional LSC funds in the amount of $71,076 were required to be transferred to assist in covering expenses. The total impact was a $121,336 reduction to the amount of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer reported on the Schedule of Activities ? Legal Services Corporation Grants and a reduction of LSC expenses reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Effect: Noncompliance with cost standards and procedure requirements set forth under LSC regulations. Cause: The above condition appears to be the result of inadequate controls over the formal review and approval of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer to other funds within the general ledger. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2019-003. Recommendation: We recommend ILS implement a formal procedure to review and approve LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers to other funds on an annual basis and that this review be formally documented. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-003 ? Allocation of Costs to Funding Sources Information on the federal program: Basic Field Grant (CFDA Number: 09.515030) ? Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Expenditures by a recipient are allowable under the recipient?s grant or contract only if the recipient can demonstrate that the cost was: (1) actually incurred in the performance of the grant or contract and the recipient was liable for payment; (2) reasonable and necessary for the performance of the grant or contract as approved by LSC (45 CFR ?1630.3(1-2)). Condition: LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers are utilized by ILS to transfer LSC funds to other LSC eligible activities once non-LSC funds for the activity are fully expended but do not support all expenditures of the activities. During the audit, we noted instances in which fund transfers were made and not deemed necessary. Questioned Cost: $121,336 Context: ILS utilizes LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers on an annual basis to transfer LSC funds to LSC eligible activities not fully funded by non-LSC revenue sources. During our testing of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers, we noted four instances in which transfers, in the amounts of $122,388, $18,430, $2,733, and $1,328, were made to other funds on the general ledger which were not deemed necessary as the funds had current year revenues in excess of current year expenses resulting in a total reduction of LSC expenses of $144,879. We also noted a clerical error in supplementary schedule prepared by management to support the LSC fund transfers which resulted in a $47,533 reduction to the LSC funds transferred. We noted one instance in which additional LSC funds in the amount of $71,076 were required to be transferred to assist in covering expenses. The total impact was a $121,336 reduction to the amount of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer reported on the Schedule of Activities ? Legal Services Corporation Grants and a reduction of LSC expenses reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Effect: Noncompliance with cost standards and procedure requirements set forth under LSC regulations. Cause: The above condition appears to be the result of inadequate controls over the formal review and approval of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer to other funds within the general ledger. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2019-003. Recommendation: We recommend ILS implement a formal procedure to review and approve LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers to other funds on an annual basis and that this review be formally documented. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-003 ILS will improve its process to clearly document why LSC funds are being allocated to other accounts and to show that accounts to which LSC funds are allocated require the LSC funds because other funds are not available. This process will be set up to require two individuals to approve the allocations. ILS will develop a written plan to oversee these allocation decisions, involving two individuals, by December 31, 2021 and incorporate that process in writing in its Accounting Manual. ILS?s CFO will be responsible for implementing this plan of correction.

Prior Finding References

2019-003

About Other →
2020-004
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Time recorded by attorneys and paralegals were not entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations and ILS? time keeping policy. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 16 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2020. The test found of the 16 selections, there were 5 selections that had a total of 41 daily entries in which time posted by attorneys and paralegals fell outside of ILS?s contemporaneous timekeeping policy of 2 business days. Effect: Noncompliance with timely time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations and ILS policy. We found no indications that during the test that ILS participated in any actual case or matter that violated LSC restrictions or prohibitions. Cause: Attorneys and paralegals lack of timeliness of entering time into the Legal File system. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2019-002. Recommendation: We recommend ILS continue to train employees on the importance of timekeeping to ensure compliance with ILS policy and LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-004 ? Timekeeping Requirements Information on the federal program: Basic Field, Migrant Farmworkers Project, COVID Response Grant (CFDA Number: 09.515030) ? Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Time spent by attorneys and paralegals must be documented by time records which record the amount of time spent on each case, matter, or supporting activity (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)). Time records must be created contemporaneously and account for time in increments not greater than one-quarter of an hour which comprise all of the efforts of the attorneys and paralegals for which compensation is paid (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)(1)). Condition: Time recorded by attorneys and paralegals were not entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations and ILS? time keeping policy. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 16 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2020. The test found of the 16 selections, there were 5 selections that had a total of 41 daily entries in which time posted by attorneys and paralegals fell outside of ILS?s contemporaneous timekeeping policy of 2 business days. Effect: Noncompliance with timely time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations and ILS policy. We found no indications that during the test that ILS participated in any actual case or matter that violated LSC restrictions or prohibitions. Cause: Attorneys and paralegals lack of timeliness of entering time into the Legal File system. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2019-002. Recommendation: We recommend ILS continue to train employees on the importance of timekeeping to ensure compliance with ILS policy and LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-004 During 2020 ILS developed and implemented the capability to measure contemporaneous timekeeping through our case management system, LegalServer, which we implemented January 1, 2020. We could not obtain this capacity with our pre-2020 case management system. This system has, for the most part, allowed us to closely monitor and address timely timekeeping. We will continue to use this system, train employees on contemporaneous timekeeping, and emphasize the importance of contemporaneous timekeeping to our entire workforce.

About Other →

FY 2019-12-31

$9,431,448 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 16, 2020 — management decision was due May 16, 2021.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001

In one instance, time spent by attorneys and paralegals was not appropriately charged between case, matter, and supporting activity classifications in accordance with LSC regulations. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 11 separate selections were made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2019. The test found one instance in which an employee entered a unique case number for time recorded as a matter. Our testing noted no instances that violated LSC restrictions and prohibitions. Effect: The potential effect is noncompliance with time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations. Cause: Inadequate or ineffective training regarding LSC timekeeping requirements and a lack of monitoring controls over time reporting are the key causes of the errors noted. Repeat Finding: Yes. See prior year finding 2018-001. Recommendation: ILS should implement additional timekeeping training for all employees to ensure appropriate timekeeping classifications are used. Additionally, ILS should implement more stringent monitoring controls over timekeeping to ensure noncompliance is detected in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-001 ? Timekeeping Requirements Federal program Information: Basic Field, Migrant Farmworkers Project (CFDA Number: 09.515030) ? Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Time spent by attorneys and paralegals must be documented by time records which record the amount of time spent on each case, matter, or supporting activity (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)). Each record of time spent must contain: a case, a unique client name or case number; for matters or supporting activities, an identification of the category of action on which the time was spent (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)(2)). Condition: In one instance, time spent by attorneys and paralegals was not appropriately charged between case, matter, and supporting activity classifications in accordance with LSC regulations. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 11 separate selections were made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2019. The test found one instance in which an employee entered a unique case number for time recorded as a matter. Our testing noted no instances that violated LSC restrictions and prohibitions. Effect: The potential effect is noncompliance with time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations. Cause: Inadequate or ineffective training regarding LSC timekeeping requirements and a lack of monitoring controls over time reporting are the key causes of the errors noted. Repeat Finding: Yes. See prior year finding 2018-001. Recommendation: ILS should implement additional timekeeping training for all employees to ensure appropriate timekeeping classifications are used. Additionally, ILS should implement more stringent monitoring controls over timekeeping to ensure noncompliance is detected in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-001 Management agrees that staff committed one error by designating time in an incorrect category. The auditor examined nearly 600 time entries, and the single error represents an error rate well under 1%. ILS will continue to train employees on how to properly designate time as case, matter, or supporting activity. The automated case management system ILS installed in 2020, LegalServer, allows better monitoring of this issue, which also will reduce this problem in the future.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Other →
2019-002
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-002

The case management system was unable to generate a report to confirm if time recorded by attorneys and paralegals was entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 11 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2019. The test found that the timekeeping system was unable to produce a report to test the timeliness of timekeeping records. Ultimately, all time was posted, however we were unable to test whether the time was entered contemporaneously. Effect: Noncompliance with time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations. We found no indications that, as a result of the weakness, ILS participated in an actual case or matter that violated the restrictions and prohibitions. Cause: The timekeeping system was unable to produce a report to test the timeliness of entries. Repeat Finding: Yes. See prior year finding 2018-002. Recommendation: We recommend ILS adopt system controls that tracks the timeliness of timekeeping records being entered and that its timekeeping is continuously monitored to ensure compliance with LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-002 ? TIMEKEEPING REQUIREMENTS Federal program Information: Basic Field, Migrant Farmworkers Project (CFDA Number: 09.515030) ? Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Time spent by attorneys and paralegals must be documented by time records which record the amount of time spent on each case, matter, or supporting activity (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)). Time records must be created contemporaneously and account for time in increments not greater than one-quarter of an hour which comprise all of the efforts of the attorneys and paralegals for which compensation is paid (45 CFR Section 1635.3(b)(1)). Condition: The case management system was unable to generate a report to confirm if time recorded by attorneys and paralegals was entered contemporaneously in accordance with LSC regulations. Questioned Cost: None. Context: A sample of 11 separate selections was made of attorney and paralegal time entries from various one-week periods during 2019. The test found that the timekeeping system was unable to produce a report to test the timeliness of timekeeping records. Ultimately, all time was posted, however we were unable to test whether the time was entered contemporaneously. Effect: Noncompliance with time reporting requirements set forth under LSC regulations. We found no indications that, as a result of the weakness, ILS participated in an actual case or matter that violated the restrictions and prohibitions. Cause: The timekeeping system was unable to produce a report to test the timeliness of entries. Repeat Finding: Yes. See prior year finding 2018-002. Recommendation: We recommend ILS adopt system controls that tracks the timeliness of timekeeping records being entered and that its timekeeping is continuously monitored to ensure compliance with LSC regulations. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-002 Management agrees that in 2019 it had no method for measuring whether employees? time entries met the LSC requirement that time be entered contemporaneously. The automated case management system (ACMS) ILS had in 2019 did not provide that capacity. As of January 2020, ILS implemented a new ACMS, LegalServer, which allows supervisors to review all time entries and monitor their timeliness. We regularly run reports using the data in LegalServer to determine timeliness of time entries, and managers and supervisors address instances of non-compliance. We expect that these steps, which already are in place, will fully alleviate this problem in 2020.

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Other →
2019-003
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers are utilized by ILS to transfer LSC funds to other LSC eligible activities once non-LSC funds for the activity are fully expended but do not support all expenditures of the activities. During the audit, we noted instances in which fund transfers were made and not deemed necessary. Questioned Cost: $208,002 Context: ILS utilizes LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers on an annual basis to transfer LSC funds to LSC eligible activities not fully funded by non-LSC revenue sources. During our testing of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers, we noted two instances in which transfers, in the amounts of $174,108 and $23,670, were made to other funds on the general ledger which were not deemed necessary as the funds had current year revenues in excess of current year expenses. We also noted a clerical error in supplementary schedule prepared by management to support the LSC fund transfers which resulted in a $10,224 reduction to the LSC funds transferred. The total impact was a $208,002 reduction to the amount of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer reported on the Schedule of Activities ? Legal Services Corporation Grants and a reduction of LSC expenses reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Effect: Noncompliance with cost standards and procedure requirements set forth under LSC regulations. Cause: The above condition appears to be the result of inadequate controls over the formal review and approval of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer to other funds within the general ledger. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend ILS implement a formal procedure to review and approve LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers to other funds on an annual basis and that this review be formally documented. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-003 ? ALLOCATION OF COSTS TO FUNDING SOURCES Federal program Information: Basic Field Grant (CFDA Number: 09.515030) ? Legal Services Corporation Criteria: Expenditures by a recipient are allowable under the recipient?s grant or contract only if the recipient can demonstrate that the cost was: (1) actually incurred in the performance of the grant or contract and the recipient was liable for payment; (2) reasonable and necessary for the performance of the grant or contract as approved by LSC (45 CFR ?1630.3(1-2)). Condition: LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers are utilized by ILS to transfer LSC funds to other LSC eligible activities once non-LSC funds for the activity are fully expended but do not support all expenditures of the activities. During the audit, we noted instances in which fund transfers were made and not deemed necessary. Questioned Cost: $208,002 Context: ILS utilizes LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers on an annual basis to transfer LSC funds to LSC eligible activities not fully funded by non-LSC revenue sources. During our testing of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers, we noted two instances in which transfers, in the amounts of $174,108 and $23,670, were made to other funds on the general ledger which were not deemed necessary as the funds had current year revenues in excess of current year expenses. We also noted a clerical error in supplementary schedule prepared by management to support the LSC fund transfers which resulted in a $10,224 reduction to the LSC funds transferred. The total impact was a $208,002 reduction to the amount of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer reported on the Schedule of Activities ? Legal Services Corporation Grants and a reduction of LSC expenses reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Effect: Noncompliance with cost standards and procedure requirements set forth under LSC regulations. Cause: The above condition appears to be the result of inadequate controls over the formal review and approval of LSC Basic Field matching fund transfer to other funds within the general ledger. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend ILS implement a formal procedure to review and approve LSC Basic Field matching fund transfers to other funds on an annual basis and that this review be formally documented. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-003 Management agrees with this finding and agrees that the error has been corrected in its financial statements, so that it has no effect on ILS?s financial position as reflected in the financial statements. Going forward, ILS plans to perform these fund transfers quarterly rather than annually. The CFO will propose the transfers, which will be reviewed by the Director of Accounting before they are completed. This review will be documented. The ILS Accounting Manual will be amended to reflect this process

About Other →

FY 2018-12-31

$8,320,689 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2019 — management decision was due December 24, 2019.

2018-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Other →
2018-002
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

FY 2017-12-31

$7,743,588 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2018 — management decision was due November 6, 2018.

2017-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Other →
2017-002
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2017-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

FY 2016-12-31

$7,325,066 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 2, 2017 — management decision was due November 2, 2017.

2016-001
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-002
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Indiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.