← Back to home

Monroe Fire Protection DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 351728565

UEI: DFNRHBLDX111

Audited by: Indiana State Board of Accounts

Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Showing data from August 28, 2026 — the Federal Audit Clearinghouse is under high demand right now, so this couldn't be refreshed. This is the most recent data on record, not necessarily today's.

Monroe Fire Protection District3 audit years3 findings
3
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$2,485,352 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 15, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 15, 2026 (169 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$859,047 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Monroe County Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is done by checking the Excluding Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The District did not have a policy related to SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements. Three vendors were identified as having transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000. All three vendors were selected for testing. The three vendors were reviewed, and only one of the vendors had documented audit evidence to show that the vendor was checked for suspension, debarment, or other exclusion prior to entering into the transactions. This was due to the utilization of a purchasing cooperative for this purchase. The other two vendors, with total expenditures of $66,575, did not have documented audit evidence to show that the vendors were checked for suspension, debarment, or other exclusion prior to entering into the transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 MONROE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the District had not developed a system of internal controls that addressed the need to verify suspension, debarment, or other exclusions prior to entering into transactions with vendors. Effect Without the proper design and implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the District cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay vendors that have been suspended and debarred would be unallowable. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future funding to the District. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the District's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Monroe County Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is done by checking the Excluding Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The District did not have a policy related to SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements. Three vendors were identified as having transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000. All three vendors were selected for testing. The three vendors were reviewed, and only one of the vendors had documented audit evidence to show that the vendor was checked for suspension, debarment, or other exclusion prior to entering into the transactions. This was due to the utilization of a purchasing cooperative for this purchase. The other two vendors, with total expenditures of $66,575, did not have documented audit evidence to show that the vendors were checked for suspension, debarment, or other exclusion prior to entering into the transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 MONROE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the District had not developed a system of internal controls that addressed the need to verify suspension, debarment, or other exclusions prior to entering into transactions with vendors. Effect Without the proper design and implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the District cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay vendors that have been suspended and debarred would be unallowable. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future funding to the District. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the District's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-002 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Finding Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Suspension and Debarment Summary of Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters – no policy to check for suspension and debarment prior to entering into transactions with vendors Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dustin Dillard, Chief Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-331-1906; ddillard@monroefd.org Views of Responsible Officials: “We concur with the finding.” Description of Corrective Action Plan: The District will adopt a policy related to State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) suspension and debarment requirements, and develop a system of internal controls that addresses the need to verify suspension, debarment, or other exclusions prior to entering into transactions with vendors who may have transactions equal to or exceeding $25,000 of federal funds in one year. Policy will include verification by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$1,544,961 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2023 — management decision was due March 25, 2024.

2022-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Period of Performance
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Cash Management, and Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Assistance Listings Number: 97.083 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EMW-2017-FH-00374, EMW-2019-FF-01116 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Cash Management, Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The District had designed, but did not adequately document implementation of a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The District incurred and paid for payroll and other related expenses, and then requested reimbursement from the federal agency for these costs. Costs requested for reimbursement from the federal agency are to be allowable per the grant, adequately supported, paid prior to reimbursement, and paid within the period of performance. The District submitted seven reimbursement requests during the audit period. The Financial Coordinator compiled the payroll and benefit amounts to be submitted for reimbursement and provided it to the Fire Chief. The reimbursement request was then filed by the Fire Chief without evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors to ensure the payroll was an allowable activity, allowable cost, paid prior to reimbursement, and within the period of performance. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The system of internal controls, as documented by management of the District, could not be verified as being implemented. While the District had a written policy outlining the procedures to ensure the activity was allowable per the grant, adequately supported, paid prior to reimbursement, and paid within the period of performance documentation of the implementation of the procedures as intended was not maintained. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect management's statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the District design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Cash Management, and Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Assistance Listings Number: 97.083 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EMW-2017-FH-00374, EMW-2019-FF-01116 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Cash Management, Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The District had designed, but did not adequately document implementation of a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The District incurred and paid for payroll and other related expenses, and then requested reimbursement from the federal agency for these costs. Costs requested for reimbursement from the federal agency are to be allowable per the grant, adequately supported, paid prior to reimbursement, and paid within the period of performance. The District submitted seven reimbursement requests during the audit period. The Financial Coordinator compiled the payroll and benefit amounts to be submitted for reimbursement and provided it to the Fire Chief. The reimbursement request was then filed by the Fire Chief without evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors to ensure the payroll was an allowable activity, allowable cost, paid prior to reimbursement, and within the period of performance. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The system of internal controls, as documented by management of the District, could not be verified as being implemented. While the District had a written policy outlining the procedures to ensure the activity was allowable per the grant, adequately supported, paid prior to reimbursement, and paid within the period of performance documentation of the implementation of the procedures as intended was not maintained. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect management's statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the District design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dustin Dillard Contact Phone Number: 812-331-1906 Views of Responsible Official: We understand and agree with the importance of internal controls and segregation of duties at the District and we believe our policies, procedures, individual job descriptions and management oversight fulfill these necessary requirements, we intend to comply with the suggestions made by the auditing staff. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The SAFER Reimbursement Request spreadsheets are prepared by two administrative personnel who perform checks and balances on calculations, payroll reports, time-keeping reports and employee roster changes before submitting the information to the Fire Chief for review and submission. The District now requires both Administrative personnel to sign and date a cover sheet upon completion of the compilation. The Financial Administrative Assistant will reconcile the data entered into the FEMA portal by the Chief by initialing a printed copy of the dated request. Anticipated Completion Date: To be implemented with all future reimbursement requests following this date 8-23-23 More information about this finding is available in the Supplemental Report.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Period of Performance →
2022-004
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Assistance Listings Number: 97.083 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EMW-2017-FH-00374, EMW-2019-FF-01116 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Recipients are required to submit Reimbursement Requests, Quarterly Performance Reports, and Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based on the calendar year, and recipients must begin to submit reports in the period following the beginning of their period of performance, and throughout the entire period of performance of the grant. Information to be reported includes expenditures for the appropriate reporting period. Reimbursement Requests The District submitted seven Reimbursement Requests during the audit period. The Financial Coordinator prepared a sheet with the payroll and benefit amounts to be submitted for reimbursement and provided it to the Fire Chief. The Reimbursement Requests were filed by the Fire Chief without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Quarterly and Programmatic Performance Reports and Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports EMW-2017-FH-00374 (2017 grant) The District had not implemented or designed a system of internal controls to ensure submission of the Quarterly Performance Reports (quarterly reports) or the Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports. During the audit period, the District was required to submit three quarterly reports and two semi-annual reports. The submission dates for the three quarterly reports could not be determined. Additionally, the District did not submit the Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports that were due by January 30, 2022, and July 30, 2022, in a timely manner. The two reports due were submitted 18 and 19 days late, respectively. EMW-2019-FF-01116 (2019 grant) The District had not implemented or designed a system of internal controls to ensure submission of the Programmatic Performance Report (PPR) or the Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Report (semi-annual report). During the audit period, the District was required to submit one PPR and two semi-annual reports. The submission date for the PPR, that was due April 30, 2022, could not be determined. In addition, the District did not submit the semi-annual reports that were due by January 30, 2022, and July 30, 2022, in a timely manner. The two reports were submitted 30 and 13 days late, respectively. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually nor more frequent than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. Alternatively, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year Federal awards. . . ." Cause A system of internal controls was not designed or implemented by management of the District, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect management's statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the seven Quarterly Performance Reports and the four Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports due during the audit period were either not submitted or not submitted timely. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the District. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that management of the District design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place over reimbursement requisitions. In addition, we recommended that management of the District establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed and filed timely. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Assistance Listings Number: 97.083 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EMW-2017-FH-00374, EMW-2019-FF-01116 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Recipients are required to submit Reimbursement Requests, Quarterly Performance Reports, and Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based on the calendar year, and recipients must begin to submit reports in the period following the beginning of their period of performance, and throughout the entire period of performance of the grant. Information to be reported includes expenditures for the appropriate reporting period. Reimbursement Requests The District submitted seven Reimbursement Requests during the audit period. The Financial Coordinator prepared a sheet with the payroll and benefit amounts to be submitted for reimbursement and provided it to the Fire Chief. The Reimbursement Requests were filed by the Fire Chief without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Quarterly and Programmatic Performance Reports and Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports EMW-2017-FH-00374 (2017 grant) The District had not implemented or designed a system of internal controls to ensure submission of the Quarterly Performance Reports (quarterly reports) or the Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports. During the audit period, the District was required to submit three quarterly reports and two semi-annual reports. The submission dates for the three quarterly reports could not be determined. Additionally, the District did not submit the Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports that were due by January 30, 2022, and July 30, 2022, in a timely manner. The two reports due were submitted 18 and 19 days late, respectively. EMW-2019-FF-01116 (2019 grant) The District had not implemented or designed a system of internal controls to ensure submission of the Programmatic Performance Report (PPR) or the Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Report (semi-annual report). During the audit period, the District was required to submit one PPR and two semi-annual reports. The submission date for the PPR, that was due April 30, 2022, could not be determined. In addition, the District did not submit the semi-annual reports that were due by January 30, 2022, and July 30, 2022, in a timely manner. The two reports were submitted 30 and 13 days late, respectively. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually nor more frequent than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. Alternatively, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year Federal awards. . . ." Cause A system of internal controls was not designed or implemented by management of the District, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect management's statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the seven Quarterly Performance Reports and the four Semi-Annual SF-425 Federal Financial Reports due during the audit period were either not submitted or not submitted timely. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the District. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that management of the District design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place over reimbursement requisitions. In addition, we recommended that management of the District establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed and filed timely. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Reporting Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dustin Dillard Contact Phone Number: 812-331-1906 Views of Responsible Official: We agree with this finding and will make necessary changes. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The District has contacted our FEMA representative for guidance on how to complete the Programmatic Performance Reports which currently are past due. We were informed it was not on her priority list and it would be a while before she could help. This has often been an issue in submitting these reports. We have contacted a second representative who was slightly more helpful, but suggested we contact the next level of management for assistance. We hope to hear back from a Mr. Jones in the next week or two regarding our request. Once we have submitted all delinquent reports, we will create calendar reminders to check the portal for all grants monthly to ensure there are no missing or delinquent reports. Anticipated Completion Date: 12-31-2023 More information about this finding is available in the Supplemental Report. Monroe Fire Protection District 25

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Indiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.