Southwest Dubois County School CorporationLocal Government

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-001Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost PrinciplesFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Number: 84.425DFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost PrinciplesAudit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliancewith requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliancerequirement.Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflectthe work performed. One employee was paid from ESSER I and ESSER II grant awards and also fromother funding sources. Adequate time records were not maintained for the employee to determine if theproper amount was charged to the federal award. The total amount charged to the federal award of $28,599was considered a questioned cost.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part:"Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salariesand wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Theserecords must:(i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance thatthe charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated;(ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity;INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS16SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)(iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by thenon-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this perthe IHE's definition of IBS); . . .(vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activitiesor cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federalaward and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; twoor more indirect activities which allocated using different allocation bases; or anunallowable activity and a direct or indirect costs activity. . . ."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliancerequirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsQuestioned costs of $28,599 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensurecompliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliancerequirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-002Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Number: 84.425DFederal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425D200013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliancewith requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS17SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)One of five annual reports required to be completed during the audit period contained materialerrors. The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I), Year 1 annual data reportoverstated total expenditures made between March 13, 2020, and September, 30, 2020, by $130,918. Inaddition, documentation provided for the number of full-time employee positions did not support theamounts reported.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . .(3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federalawards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures,income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS18SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to goundetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement couldresult in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensurecompliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-003Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food ServiceProgram for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2021, FY 2022Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn internal control system was designed and implemented, but not effective, at the SchoolCorporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reportingcompliance requirement.Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Departmentof Education based upon meals served for the month. The monthly Claims were prepared by the FoodService Director and reviewed by the Business Manager; however, the internal control was not effective toprevent, or detect and correct, errors. For three of the seven monthly Claims tested, there were differencesbetween the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The threeClaims had less meals served than the School Corporation's summary meal count reports, which resultedin underclaimed meals.The lack of adequate internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout theaudit period.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS19SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."7 CFR 210.8(a) states in part:"Internal controls. The school food authority shall establish internal controls which ensure theaccuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. . . .(2) School food authority claims review process. Prior to the submission of a monthlyClaim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the lunch count datafor each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim forReimbursement. . . ."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to goundetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement couldresult in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - EarmarkingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: Special Education Grants to StatesAssistance Listings Number: 84.027Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 21611-009-PN01Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, EarmarkingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified OpinionCondition and ContextThe School Corporation is a member of the Exceptional Children's Co-op (Cooperative). Duringfiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federalmoney on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Departmentof Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring andproviding oversight of the Cooperative. There was inadequate oversight performed by the SchoolCorporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliancerequirement.The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperativecomplied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in placeto ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met foreach member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public schoolexpenditures were appropriately identified and reported.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 21611-009-PN01 grant award could notbe verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. Thenon-public proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-publicschool budgeted expenditures. These were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unableto identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE asrequired.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 21611-009-PN01 grant award.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS21SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.403 states in part:"Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteriain order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . .(g) Be adequately documented. . . ."2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjustspecific Federal award conditions as needed . . ."511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states:"The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublicschools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency totalsubgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities,who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the totalnumber of students with disabilities of the same age range."CauseThe School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controlsthat would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of theMatching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costsof federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarkingrequirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system ofinternal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliancewith the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2020-001Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Cash ManagementFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program,National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National SchoolLunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children,COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenCFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2019, FY 2020Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Cash ManagementAudit Finding: Material WeaknessCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place atthe School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and theCash Management compliance requirement.One person was solely responsible for all aspects of monitoring the program's cash balance toensure it did not exceed the three months average expenditures.The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliancewith Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for InternalControl in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United Statesor the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."CauseManagement had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would haveensured compliance with the Cash Management compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk ofnoncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement. A lack of segregation of dutieswithin an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirementand allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight,reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls,including segregation of duties, related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliancerequirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2020-002Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - EligibilityFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School BreakfastProgram, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 -National School Lunch ProgramCFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2019, FY 2020Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: EligibilityAudit Finding: Material WeaknessCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place atthe School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and theEligibility compliance requirement.One person was solely responsible for all aspects of eligibility determinations, which were determinedby a food service software system with no internal controls in place over the input of the eligibilityguidelines or the determination.The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliancewith Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for InternalControl in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United Statesor the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."15CauseManagement had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would haveensured compliance with the Eligibility compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk ofnoncompliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility compliance requirement. A lack of segregationof duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliancerequirement and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having properoversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls,including segregation of duties, related to the grant agreement and Eligibility compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS16

GSA_MIGRATION

GSA_MIGRATION

GSA_MIGRATION

GSA_MIGRATION