EIN: 351099623
UEI: ETL3NTR6SQ55
Audited by: Crowe LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2026 (17 days from today).
What is a management decision? →The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchase and simplified acquisition procurement thresholds were followed. Cause: Although the School Corporation has adopted a procurement policy that establishes purchasing requirements based on defined dollar thresholds and requires verification of vendor suspension and debarment status, the policy was not fully adhered to. Required procurement methods were not utilized for certain purchases that exceeded applicable thresholds and the required suspension and debarment verifications were not consistently performed. This condition resulted from insufficient oversight and monitoring to ensure compliance with all aspects of the School Corporation’s procurement policy. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not review procurements done by the food service management company to ensure that proper procurement policies were followed. The School Corporation did not ensure that the food service management company did not use suspended or debarred vendors. During the audit period, we noted two small purchases for which the School Corporation did not have evidence of obtaining multiple quotes or documented rationale for selecting the vendor. Only the final invoice, purchase order, and quote from the selected vendor were available. During fiscal year 2024, we noted that for one of the three vendors tested, the correct procurement method was not followed. Purchases from the vendor were in excess of $150,000 during the fiscal year, requiring the simplified acquisition procurement process; however, the School Corporation applied the small purchase procurement process. The purchase was for equipment at two different buildings. The School Corporation issued two requests for quotes, one for each school, and treated them as separate procurements. However, as the purchases were similar in nature, the requests for quotes were dated the same day and sent to the same vendor, this should have been treated as one procurement in aggregate. The School Corporation did not have support for public advertisement, requests for formal sealed bids, or formal documentation for the basis of award. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, we noted two vendors out of three that were sampled, over the $25,000 suspension and debarment threshold for which the School Corporation did not have evidence of a suspension and debarment check. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal control by establishing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure that procurement activities for goods and services comply with applicable requirements and that contractors and subrecipients are verified as not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchase and simplified acquisition procurement thresholds were followed. Cause: Although the School Corporation has adopted a procurement policy that establishes purchasing requirements based on defined dollar thresholds and requires verification of vendor suspension and debarment status, the policy was not fully adhered to. Required procurement methods were not utilized for certain purchases that exceeded applicable thresholds and the required suspension and debarment verifications were not consistently performed. This condition resulted from insufficient oversight and monitoring to ensure compliance with all aspects of the School Corporation’s procurement policy. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not review procurements done by the food service management company to ensure that proper procurement policies were followed. The School Corporation did not ensure that the food service management company did not use suspended or debarred vendors. During the audit period, we noted two small purchases for which the School Corporation did not have evidence of obtaining multiple quotes or documented rationale for selecting the vendor. Only the final invoice, purchase order, and quote from the selected vendor were available. During fiscal year 2024, we noted that for one of the three vendors tested, the correct procurement method was not followed. Purchases from the vendor were in excess of $150,000 during the fiscal year, requiring the simplified acquisition procurement process; however, the School Corporation applied the small purchase procurement process. The purchase was for equipment at two different buildings. The School Corporation issued two requests for quotes, one for each school, and treated them as separate procurements. However, as the purchases were similar in nature, the requests for quotes were dated the same day and sent to the same vendor, this should have been treated as one procurement in aggregate. The School Corporation did not have support for public advertisement, requests for formal sealed bids, or formal documentation for the basis of award. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, we noted two vendors out of three that were sampled, over the $25,000 suspension and debarment threshold for which the School Corporation did not have evidence of a suspension and debarment check. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal control by establishing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure that procurement activities for goods and services comply with applicable requirements and that contractors and subrecipients are verified as not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchase and simplified acquisition procurement thresholds were followed. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micropurchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micropurchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not review procurements done by the food service management company to ensure that proper procurement policies were followed. The School Corporation did not ensure that the food service management company did not use suspended or debarred vendors. During the audit period, we noted two small purchases for which the School Corporation did not have evidence of obtaining multiple quotes or documented rationale for selecting the vendor. Only the final invoice, purchase order, and quote from the selected vendor were available. During fiscal year 2024, we noted that for one of the three vendors tested, the correct procurement method was not followed. Purchases from the vendor were in excess of $150,000 during the fiscal year, requiring the simplified acquisition procurement process; however, the School Corporation applied the small purchase procurement process. The purchase was for equipment at two different buildings. The School Corporation issued two requests for quotes, one for each school, and treated them as separate procurements. However, as the purchases were similar in nature, the requests for quotes were dated the same day and sent to the same vendor, this should have been treated as one procurement in aggregate. The School Corporation did not have support for public advertisement, requests for formal sealed bids, or formal documentation for the basis of award. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, we noted two vendors out of three that were sampled, over the $25,000 suspension and debarment threshold for which the School Corporation did not have evidence of a suspension and debarment check. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Management will review procurements done by the food service management company. Management will also ensure that appropriate procurement processes are followed for all future purchases and suspension and debarment checks are completed for purchases over $25,000. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: The Treasurer will be responsible for implementing the corrective action plan, which will go into effect immediately.
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable cost/cost principles requirements. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that stipend and wage rates were properly reviewed and approved. Cause: Management of the School Corporation did not design an adequate system of internal controls. A properly designed and implemented internal control system should include formal policies and procedures. Policies establish management’s expectations regarding internal controls, while procedures outline the specific actions necessary to implement those policies. Effect: Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal control, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the testing of activities allowed and unallowed costs-cost principles, 12 vendor disbursements and 40 payroll disbursements were selected for testing. The following deficiencies were noted related to controls over pay rate approvals: • For 10 of 10 stipends sampled, the School Corporation could not provide proper approval of the stipend amount. The total of amount of stipends sampled was $5,056. The total amount of stipends charged to the grant for the audit period was $57,558. • One employee was underpaid by $9, and the error was not caught during the review process. • For two of seven hourly employees sampled, the School Corporation provided a pay chart. However, approval of the rates was not available. • One teacher received twice their regular paycheck amount due to a contract pay off. The School Corporation could not provide approval or additional support related to the contract payoff amount of $1,528. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal control by establishing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure that stipend and wage rates are properly approved and adequate support is maintained to validate those approvals. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund, Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER III) Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable cost/cost principles requirements. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that stipend and wage rates were properly reviewed and approved. Cause: Management of the School Corporation did not design an adequate system of internal controls. A properly designed and implemented internal control system should include formal policies and procedures. Policies establish management’s expectations regarding internal controls, while procedures outline the specific actions necessary to implement those policies. Effect: Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal control, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the testing of activities allowed and unallowed costs-cost principles, 12 vendor disbursements and 40 payroll disbursements were selected for testing. The following deficiencies were noted related to controls over pay rate approvals: • For 10 of 10 stipends sampled, the School Corporation could not provide proper approval of the stipend amount. The total of amount of stipends sampled was $5,056. The total amount of stipends charged to the grant for the audit period was $57,558. • One employee was underpaid by $9, and the error was not caught during the review process. • For two of seven hourly employees sampled, the School Corporation provided a pay chart. However, approval of the rates was not available. • One teacher received twice their regular paycheck amount due to a contract pay off. The School Corporation could not provide approval or additional support related to the contract payoff amount of $1,528. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal control by establishing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure that stipend and wage rates are properly approved and adequate support is maintained to validate those approvals. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund, Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER III) Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Internal Control Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable cost/cost principles requirements. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that stipend and wage rates were properly reviewed and approved. Context: For the testing of activities allowed and unallowed costs-cost principles, 12 vendor disbursements and 40 payroll disbursements were selected for testing. The following deficiencies were noted related to controls over pay rate approvals: • For 10 of 10 stipends sampled, the School Corporation could not provide proper approval of the stipend amount. The total of amount of stipends sampled was $5,056. The total amount of stipends charged to the grant for the audit period was $57,558. • One employee was underpaid by $9, and the error was not caught during the review process. • For two of seven hourly employees sampled, the School Corporation provided a pay chart. However, approval of the rates was not available. • One teacher received twice their regular paycheck amount due to a contract pay off. The School Corporation could not provide approval or additional support related to the contract payoff amount of $1,528. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Management will retain documentation and approval for stipend and hourly pay rates. Management will review all pay runs and ensure the accurate amount of pay is disbursed and retain documentation for any changes in pay amounts. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: The Treasurer will be responsible for implementing the corrective action plan, which will go into effect immediately.
FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2024 — management decision was due September 22, 2024.
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that grant expenditures were for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, were in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were obligated during the award period of performance. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the Cooperative to ensure expenditures were allowable, conformed with cost principles and were incurred during the period of performance. FINDING 2023-002 (Continued) Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect: Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal control, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that grant expenditures were for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, were in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were obligated during the award period of performance. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the Cooperative to ensure expenditures were allowable, conformed with cost principles and were incurred during the period of performance. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal control, including policies and procedures, that are documented that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01, 20619-022-PN01, 21619-022- PN01, 22619-022-PN01, 22619-022-ARP, 23619-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that grant expenditures were for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, were in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were obligated during the award period of performance. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the Cooperative to ensure expenditures were allowable, conformed with cost principles and were incurred during the period of performance. FINDING 2023-002 (Continued) Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect: Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal control, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that grant expenditures were for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, were in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were obligated during the award period of performance. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the Cooperative to ensure expenditures were allowable, conformed with cost principles and were incurred during the period of performance. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal control, including policies and procedures, that are documented that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01, 20619-022-PN01, 21619-022-PN01, 22619-022-PN01, 22619-022-ARP, 23619-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that grant expenditures were for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, were in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were obligated during the award period of performance. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the Cooperative to ensure expenditures were allowable, conformed with cost principles and were incurred during the period of performance. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance compliance requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that grant expenditures were for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, were in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were obligated during the award period of performance. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the Cooperative to ensure expenditures were allowable, conformed with cost principles and were incurred during the period of performance. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: 1 – All invoices, as well as receipts, will be documented upon receipt by the Director of Special Education at Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative. After this takes place, The Director of Finance at Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative will then create vouchers and receipts accordingly. Prior to submission, the Director of Special Education of Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative will verify all documents for accuracy. The Superintendent and Treasurer of Southwest School Corporation will review the documentation for the Cooperative at lease semi-annually. Responsible party and timeline for completion: Chris Stitzle, Superintendent – April 1, 2024
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the Cooperative has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, there is no identifier or separate way to track which member school the funding was expended for. As such, the Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-022-PN01, 20611- 022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Additionally, the Cooperative did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the 19611-022-PN01 and 20611-022-PN01 grant awards. For the 21611-022-PN01 grant award, a waiver was obtained from the IDOE which was used to cover a portion of the member school's required proportionate share amount; however, the remaining amount, which the Cooperative claimed to have expended, could not be traced to documentation that indicated which member school the expenditure was applied to. For the 22611-022-PN01 grant award, no waiver was obtained, and the amounts spent could not be traced to documentation that indicated which member school the expenditure was applied to. Also, the total amount expended for proportionate share was less than the total amount required when all member school proportionate share requirements were totaled. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards were $1,931, $3,486, $6,832, and $1,794, respectively. FINDING 2023-003 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." FINDING 2023-003 (Continued) Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the Cooperative has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, there is no identifier or separate way to track which member school the funding was expended for. As such, the Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-022-PN01, 20611- 022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Additionally, the Cooperative did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the 19611-022-PN01 and 20611-022-PN01 grant awards. For the 21611-022-PN01 grant award, a waiver was obtained from the IDOE which was used to cover a portion of the member school's required proportionate share amount; however, the remaining amount, which the Cooperative claimed to have expended, could not be traced to documentation that indicated which member school the expenditure was applied to. For the 22611-022-PN01 grant award, no waiver was obtained, and the amounts spent could not be traced to documentation that indicated which member school the expenditure was applied to. Also, the total amount expended for proportionate share was less than the total amount required when all member school proportionate share requirements were totaled. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards were $1,931, $3,486, $6,832, and $1,794, respectively. FINDING 2023-003 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the Cooperative has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, there is no identifier or separate way to track which member school the funding was expended for. As such, the Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Additionally, the Cooperative did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the 19611-022-PN01 and 20611-022-PN01 grant awards. For the 21611-022-PN01 grant award, a waiver was obtained from the IDOE which was used to cover a portion of the member school's required proportionate share amount; however, the remaining amount, which the Cooperative claimed to have expended, could not be traced to documentation that indicated which member school the expenditure was applied to. For the 22611-022-PN01 grant award, no waiver was obtained, and the amounts spent could not be traced to documentation that indicated which member school the expenditure was applied to. Also, the total amount expended for proportionate share was less than the total amount required when all member school proportionate share requirements were totaled. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, and 22611-022-PN01 grant awards were $1,931, $3,486, $6,832, and $1,794, respectively. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: 1 – Southwest School Corporation will establish a system of internal controls and procedures to ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retailed for audit. 2 – Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative will require all staff to complete the appropriate google form following the completion of each session with Non-Public students. An example of this documentation is the Proportionate Share Service Log. This document will allow for ease of tracking funds per provider/school district. This will allow for successful usage of funds. In the event that funds are not successfully used, a waiver will be requested barring board approval. Responsible party and timeline for completion: Chris Stitzle, Superintendent, April 1, 2024
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and suspension an debarment requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for micro or small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the Cooperative to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained, if required, or documentation to support limited procurement procedures. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. FINDING 2023-004 (Continued) Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2022, three vendors, totaling $88,772, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. One of the three vendors was a bankcard used to pay several different vendors; however, individual determinations of amount spent by vendor could not be determined, and thus it was considered under this threshold. All three vendors were tested. For all three, the Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2023, six vendors, totaling $264,106, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. One of the six vendors was a bankcard used to pay several different vendors; however, individual determinations of amount spent by vendor could not be determined, and thus it was considered under this threshold. All six vendors were tested. For five of the six, totaling $252,906, the Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. FINDING 2023-004 (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed they relied on a clause to be included in the vendor contracts to ensure compliance. Two covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. Both transactions, totaling $192,218, were selected for testing. One of the two transactions, totaling $44,883, included the appropriate clause. For the other vendor, the Cooperative did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance regarding suspension and debarment were isolated to fiscal year 2023. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal control and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01, 20619-022-PN01, 21619-022- PN01, 22619-022-PN01, 22619-022-ARP, 23619-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” FINDING 2023-004 (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and suspension an debarment requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for micro or small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the Cooperative to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained, if required, or documentation to support limited procurement procedures. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. FINDING 2023-004 (Continued) Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2022, three vendors, totaling $88,772, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. One of the three vendors was a bankcard used to pay several different vendors; however, individual determinations of amount spent by vendor could not be determined, and thus it was considered under this threshold. All three vendors were tested. For all three, the Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2023, six vendors, totaling $264,106, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. One of the six vendors was a bankcard used to pay several different vendors; however, individual determinations of amount spent by vendor could not be determined, and thus it was considered under this threshold. All six vendors were tested. For five of the six, totaling $252,906, the Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. FINDING 2023-004 (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed they relied on a clause to be included in the vendor contracts to ensure compliance. Two covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. Both transactions, totaling $192,218, were selected for testing. One of the two transactions, totaling $44,883, included the appropriate clause. For the other vendor, the Cooperative did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance regarding suspension and debarment were isolated to fiscal year 2023. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal control and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01, 20619-022-PN01, 21619-022-PN01, 22619-022-PN01, 22619-022-ARP, 23619-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and suspension an debarment requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for micro or small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the Cooperative to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained, if required, or documentation to support limited procurement procedures. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2022, three vendors, totaling $88,772, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. One of the three vendors was a bankcard used to pay several different vendors; however, individual determinations of amount spent by vendor could not be determined, and thus it was considered under this threshold. All three vendors were tested. For all three, the Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2023, six vendors, totaling $264,106, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. One of the six vendors was a bankcard used to pay several different vendors; however, individual determinations of amount spent by vendor could not be determined, and thus it was considered under this threshold. All six vendors were tested. For five of the six, totaling $252,906, the Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed they relied on a clause to be included in the vendor contracts to ensure compliance. Two covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. Both transactions, totaling $192,218, were selected for testing. One of the two transactions, totaling $44,883, included the appropriate clause. For the other vendor, the Cooperative did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance regarding suspension and debarment were isolated to fiscal year 2023. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: 1 – Southwest School Corporation will ensure a system of internal control and procedures are in place and appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services are followed. 2 – The Cooperative will post any openings that exceed the small purchase threshold in the local newspapers, within the office, and on the cooperative website. Any and all proposals will be presented to the Cooperative Board of Directors for approval. Responsible party and timeline for completion: Chris Stitzle, Superintendent – April 1, 2024
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the reporting requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that requests for reimbursement were submitted accurately and agreed to supporting documentation. There was a documented oversight, review, and approval process in place; however, the Cooperative did not adequately ensure that proper procedures were followed. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. FINDING 2023-005 (Continued) Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, amounts requested for reimbursement could not be traced to the Cooperative’s ledgers for expenditures. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the reporting requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that requests for reimbursement were submitted accurately and agreed to supporting documentation. There was a documented oversight, review, and approval process in place; however, the Cooperative did not adequately ensure that proper procedures were followed. For fiscal year 2022, 51 Reimbursement Reports were tested. 14 Reimbursement Reports could not be traced to unit ledgers for expenditures, and 21 Reports did not have appropriate supporting documentation. For fiscal year 2023, 23 Reimbursement Reports were tested. Three Reimbursements Report did not agree to supporting documentation, and key line items could not be verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure supporting documentation is used and retained for all reimbursement requests submitted. fficials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2023-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01, 20619-022-PN01, 21619-022- PN01, 22619-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion FINDING 2023-005 (Continued) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . .” 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the reporting requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that requests for reimbursement were submitted accurately and agreed to supporting documentation. There was a documented oversight, review, and approval process in place; however, the Cooperative did not adequately ensure that proper procedures were followed. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. FINDING 2023-005 (Continued) Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, amounts requested for reimbursement could not be traced to the Cooperative’s ledgers for expenditures. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the reporting requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that requests for reimbursement were submitted accurately and agreed to supporting documentation. There was a documented oversight, review, and approval process in place; however, the Cooperative did not adequately ensure that proper procedures were followed. For fiscal year 2022, 51 Reimbursement Reports were tested. 14 Reimbursement Reports could not be traced to unit ledgers for expenditures, and 21 Reports did not have appropriate supporting documentation. For fiscal year 2023, 23 Reimbursement Reports were tested. Three Reimbursements Report did not agree to supporting documentation, and key line items could not be verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure supporting documentation is used and retained for all reimbursement requests submitted. fficials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-022-PN01, 20611-022-PN01, 21611-022-PN01, 22611-022-PN01, 22611-022-ARP, 23611-022-PN01, 20619-022-PN01, 21619-022-PN01, 22619-022-PN01, 22619-022-ARP, 23619-022-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the reporting requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that requests for reimbursement were submitted accurately and agreed to supporting documentation. There was a documented oversight, review, and approval process in place; however, the Cooperative did not adequately ensure that proper procedures were followed. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Greene-Sullivan Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the reporting requirements. The Cooperative had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to determine that requests for reimbursement were submitted accurately and agreed to supporting documentation. There was a documented oversight, review, and approval process in place; however, the Cooperative did not adequately ensure that proper procedures were followed. For fiscal year 2022, 51 Reimbursement Reports were tested. 14 Reimbursement Reports could not be traced to unit ledgers for expenditures, and 21 Reports did not have appropriate supporting documentation. For fiscal year 2023, 23 Reimbursement Reports were tested. Three Reimbursements Report did not agree to supporting documentation, and key line items could not be verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: 1 – Greene Sullivan Special Education Cooperative will implement a procedure that includes the requirement of proper documentation for all reimbursement requests, such as the detailed history report for each request submitted. The Director will then review each request prior to submission. Responsible party and timeline for completion: Chris Stitzle, Superintendent – April 1, 2024
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not include Davis Bacon wage rate requirements in its contract with vendor which includes labor. The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company and its subcontractors for a building project. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation expended $556,865 during the audit period on a construction project to expand the cafeteria which was charged to the ESSER III grant award (84.425U) and approved through the grant application with the Indiana Department of Education. The construction contract did not include a Davis-Bacon clause prescribing federal wage rate requirements required for construction contracts. The School Corporation did not have an internal control designed to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, for the construction project to verify prevailing wages were being paid during the project period. Therefore, no review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The construction payments represented approximately 22.5% of the Education Stabilization Fund disbursements for the period under audit. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation include Davis-Bacon wage requirements in construction contracts which are federally funded and implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll report certifications are collected and reviewed by management to ensure compliance with the federal wage rate requirements. Finding 2023-006 (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: a. The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in §5.1, the following clauses… (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics… (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). Finding 2023-006 (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not include Davis Bacon wage rate requirements in its contract with vendor which includes labor. The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company and its subcontractors for a building project. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation expended $556,865 during the audit period on a construction project to expand the cafeteria which was charged to the ESSER III grant award (84.425U) and approved through the grant application with the Indiana Department of Education. The construction contract did not include a Davis-Bacon clause prescribing federal wage rate requirements required for construction contracts. The School Corporation did not have an internal control designed to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, for the construction project to verify prevailing wages were being paid during the project period. Therefore, no review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The construction payments represented approximately 22.5% of the Education Stabilization Fund disbursements for the period under audit. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation include Davis-Bacon wage requirements in construction contracts which are federally funded and implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll report certifications are collected and reviewed by management to ensure compliance with the federal wage rate requirements. Finding 2023-006 (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not include Davis Bacon wage rate requirements in its contract with vendor which includes labor. The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company and its subcontractors for a building project. Context: The School Corporation expended $556,865 during the audit period on a construction project to expand the cafeteria which was charged to the ESSER III grant award (84.425U) and approved through the grant application with the Indiana Department of Education. The construction contract did not include a Davis-Bacon clause prescribing federal wage rate requirements required for construction contracts. The School Corporation did not have an internal control designed to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, for the construction project to verify prevailing wages were being paid during the project period. Therefore, no review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The construction payments represented approximately 22.5% of the Education Stabilization Fund disbursements for the period under audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: 1 - The Southwest School Corporation will ensure that Davis Bacon rules are included in any RFP using federal funds. The Development Team will monitor to ensure that all documentation is received and retained. Responsible party and timeline for completion: Chris Stitzle, Superintendent – April 2024
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2023 — management decision was due July 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.
FINDING 2019-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 17-7715 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior year finding number was 2017-003. Condition The School Corporation has not designed or implemented adequate controls, policies, or procedures to ensure that the monthly net cash resources of the School Lunch fund did not exceed the three months average expenditures. There was no documentation of an oversight, review, or monitoring of the cash balances (net cash resources). Context The lack of controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation had no documentation to confirm the design and implemented system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the cash management requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirement and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, review, and approvals. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2019-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 17-7715 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior year finding number was 2017-003. Condition The School Corporation has not designed or implemented adequate controls, policies, or procedures to ensure that the monthly net cash resources of the School Lunch fund did not exceed the three months average expenditures. There was no documentation of an oversight, review, or monitoring of the cash balances (net cash resources). Context The lack of controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation had no documentation to confirm the design and implemented system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the cash management requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirement and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, review, and approvals. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chris Stitzle Contact Phone Number: 812-268-6311 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with findings. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Corporation Treasurer will implement a monthly system to monitor the required cash management controls of the school lunch funds 3 month average. The reports will be reviewed and signed by the Superintendent Anticipated Completion Date: April 2020
2017-003
FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2018 — management decision was due June 19, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-006, 2015-007
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-008
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-006
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-003
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-005
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Indiana →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
