← Back to home

South Newton School CorporationLocal Government

EIN: 351084259

UEI: KAUMJ9PHTQX4

Audited by: Indiana State Board of Accounts

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

South Newton School Corporation5 audit years8 findings5 repeat
5
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$3.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$3,275,190 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 18, 2026 (13 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,094,853 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2024 — management decision was due August 21, 2024.

2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to its laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in its construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. Three construction contracts, totaling $252,795, were paid from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. All three contracts were tested; however, none of the contracts contained the required prevailing wage rate clause nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractors. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Payrolls and basic records. . . . (i) (A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, "Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction"). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls obtained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls should be obtained as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to its laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in its construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. Three construction contracts, totaling $252,795, were paid from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. All three contracts were tested; however, none of the contracts contained the required prevailing wage rate clause nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractors. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Payrolls and basic records. . . . (i) (A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, "Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction"). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls obtained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls should be obtained as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-002 Finding Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Summary of Finding: An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Marci Hall Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 219.474.5184 mhall@newton.k12.in.us Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Every effort will be given to comply with this finding by improving our internal controls and documenting our actions. Anticipated Completion Date: February 1, 2024

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$2,153,813 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2022 — management decision was due November 19, 2022.

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$1,670,451 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2020 — management decision was due September 18, 2020.

2019-002
Program Income / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

FINDING 2019-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years or Other Identifying Numbers: FY17-18, FY18-19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Program Income, Special Tests and Provisions - Paid Lunch Equity Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Program Income and Special Tests and Provisions - Paid Lunch Equity compliance requirements. Program Income The School Corporation Treasurer made transfers from the Prepaid Lunch fund to the School Lunch fund based on income reports obtained from the food service software. There was no review or oversight to ensure that the correct amounts were transferred from the Prepaid Lunch fund to the School Lunch fund. Paid Lunch Equity (National School Lunch Program only) The Food Service Director entered the information into the Paid Lunch Equity worksheet to determine the paid lunch price increase requirements. There was no review or oversight to ensure that the correct amounts were entered into the worksheet. The lack of controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit. Criteria 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the Program Income and Special Tests and Provisions ? Paid Lunch Equity compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirement and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and Program Income and Special Tests and Provisions ? Paid Lunch Equity compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years or Other Identifying Numbers: FY17-18, FY18-19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Program Income, Special Tests and Provisions - Paid Lunch Equity Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Program Income and Special Tests and Provisions - Paid Lunch Equity compliance requirements. Program Income The School Corporation Treasurer made transfers from the Prepaid Lunch fund to the School Lunch fund based on income reports obtained from the food service software. There was no review or oversight to ensure that the correct amounts were transferred from the Prepaid Lunch fund to the School Lunch fund. Paid Lunch Equity (National School Lunch Program only) The Food Service Director entered the information into the Paid Lunch Equity worksheet to determine the paid lunch price increase requirements. There was no review or oversight to ensure that the correct amounts were entered into the worksheet. The lack of controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit. Criteria 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the Program Income and Special Tests and Provisions ? Paid Lunch Equity compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirement and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and Program Income and Special Tests and Provisions ? Paid Lunch Equity compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2019-002 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Marci Hall Contact Phone Number: 219-474-5184 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the findings however we are a small office and segregation of duties are difficult to meet in all areas and are not always feasible or practical. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Our goal is to establish better controls as follows: Program Income ? Every effort will be given for another person to review the transfers from prepaid lunch to the school lunch account and document such review. Paid Lunch Equity ? Every effort will be given for another person to review the PLE worksheet and document such review. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Program Income, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,658,386 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2018 — management decision was due October 4, 2018.

2017-003
Program Income / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Program Income, Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-004
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-004OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-004

About Cash Management →
2017-005
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Eligibility →
2017-006
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2017-007
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-008
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-005

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-005

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Indiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.