← Back to home

Perry Central Community School CorporationLocal Government

EIN: 351068365

UEI: UZAJKH5LMV86

Audited by: Crowe LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Perry Central Community School Corporation5 audit years13 findings8 repeat
5
Audit Years
13
Total Findings
8
Repeat Findings
$8.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$8,194,139 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 16, 2026 (12 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For 1 of 2 sample items tested, we noted the School Corporation expended $88,727 on bus garage additions which was charged to the ESSER III (84.425U) grant award. It was noted this capital asset acquisition was not reported on the capital asset listing for the School Corporation as of June 30, 2025. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation update the capital asset listing at least annually to include all equipment and real property acquisitions and review for potential capital asset dispositions. The capital asset listing should include all required information to track capital asset acquisitions purchased with federal funding. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2025-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For 1 of 2 sample items tested, we noted the School Corporation expended $88,727 on bus garage additions which was charged to the ESSER III (84.425U) grant award. It was noted this capital asset acquisition was not reported on the capital asset listing for the School Corporation as of June 30, 2025. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation update the capital asset listing at least annually to include all equipment and real property acquisitions and review for potential capital asset dispositions. The capital asset listing should include all required information to track capital asset acquisitions purchased with federal funding. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2025-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management Requirements compliance requirements. Context: For 1 of 2 sample items tested, we noted the School Corporation expended $88,727 on bus garage additions which was charged to the ESSER III (84.425U) grant award. It was noted this capital asset acquisition was not reported on the capital asset listing for the School Corporation as of June 30, 2025. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Our current protocol puts the sole responsibility for updating the capital asset listing on the Corporation Treasurer. Our policy will be revised to include at least 2 people who review the listing on an annual basis. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: Sarah Briggeman, Treasurer. Anticipated completion date: 5/31/26.

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2025-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had one project for a bus garage addition that which was funded with ESSER III (84.425U) grant awards. The School Corporation did not execute a formal contract with the vendor as the transaction was under the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. As such, there was no internal controls to communicate required prevailing wage rate requirements to the vendor prior to entering into the transaction. The School Corporation did obtain the weekly wage reports from the vendor. The total project cost disbursed during the audit period was $88,727, which included materials and labor. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement a formal process to ensure the contracts are being completed with vendors and contain all of the necessary elements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2025-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: (1) Minimum wages. (Continued) PERRY CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2025 48. Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2025-002 (Continued) (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics… (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had one project for a bus garage addition that which was funded with ESSER III (84.425U) grant awards. The School Corporation did not execute a formal contract with the vendor as the transaction was under the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. As such, there was no internal controls to communicate required prevailing wage rate requirements to the vendor prior to entering into the transaction. The School Corporation did obtain the weekly wage reports from the vendor. The total project cost disbursed during the audit period was $88,727, which included materials and labor. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement a formal process to ensure the contracts are being completed with vendors and contain all of the necessary elements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2025-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. Context: The School Corporation had one project for a bus garage addition that which was funded with ESSER III (84.425U) grant awards. The School Corporation did not execute a formal contract with the vendor as the transaction was under the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. As such, there was no internal controls to communicate required prevailing wage rate requirements to the vendor prior to entering into the transaction. The School Corporation did obtain the weekly wage reports from the vendor. The total project cost disbursed during the audit period was $88,727, which included materials and labor. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. We did not have a formal contract for this project. It was below a threshold that we had used before that necessitated a formal contract. We now understand that we should have gotten a formal contract in place because this is federal funding. We used the quotes that were provided, and the school board approved the expenditures at a school board meeting. In the future, we will secure a formal contract for all federal funds. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: Tara Bishop, Superintendent. Completed 3/1/24.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$5,476,443 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2024 — management decision was due September 11, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$3,743,895 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 13, 2022 — management decision was due May 13, 2023.

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$2,978,798 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2020 — management decision was due September 23, 2020.

2019-001
Cash Management / Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-002, 2017-004

FINDING 2019-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 17/18, FY 18/19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Cash Management, Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding Similar findings also appeared in the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding numbers were 2017-002 and 2017-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management and Eligibility compliance requirements. Cash Management The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate internal controls to ensure that the School Lunch fund monthly cash balances (net cash resources) were limited to three months average expenditures. There was no documented oversight, review, or monitoring of the cash balances. Eligibility An effective internal control system was not in place to ensure that all determinations of eligibility were calculated correctly. There was no segregation of duties, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure the information was correctly entered into the system. The lack of controls was a systemic issue, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that segregated key functions. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 17/18, FY 18/19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Cash Management, Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding Similar findings also appeared in the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding numbers were 2017-002 and 2017-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management and Eligibility compliance requirements. Cash Management The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate internal controls to ensure that the School Lunch fund monthly cash balances (net cash resources) were limited to three months average expenditures. There was no documented oversight, review, or monitoring of the cash balances. Eligibility An effective internal control system was not in place to ensure that all determinations of eligibility were calculated correctly. There was no segregation of duties, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure the information was correctly entered into the system. The lack of controls was a systemic issue, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that segregated key functions. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2019-001 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tara Bishop Contact Phone Number: 812-843-5576 Views of Responsible Official: We agree with this finding. The superintendent and ECA treasurer discussed the cash balance of the school lunch program throughout the audit period and worked to address the issue of having a balance that exceeded 3 months of expenses. They did not document these conversations, but the cash balance issue was corrected by the end of the audit period, which reflects that the conversations did occur. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The ECA treasurer and superintendent will document their ongoing conversations about the monthly balance via email, and the superintendent will continue to review and sign the monthly balance report. Anticipated Completion Date: 2/29/2020

Prior Finding References

2017-002, 2017-004

About Cash Management, Eligibility →
2019-002
Cost Allowability / Program Income
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2017-003QUESTIONED COSTS

FINDING 2019-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Program Income Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 17/18, FY 18/19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Program Income Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding A similar finding also appeared in the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2017-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Program Income compliance requirements. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles The School Corporation developed a system of internal controls in which the Treasurer approved the biweekly payroll claims, which included the salaries and wages charged to the food service program. However, the School Corporation did not properly implement this system. Several administrative staff members who worked on multiple cost objectives were compensated in part from the food service program. The School Corporation did not maintain adequate documentation of personnel expenses to certify the time charged to the grant. As a result, $56,520 in unsupported payroll expenditures were charged to the grant. The School Corporation also paid the required Social Security and Medicare taxes (FICA) related to those payroll expenditures from the food service program, which resulted in $4,324 in unsupported expenditures charged to the grant. In addition, the School Corporation paid retirement expenses for one staff member, which resulted in $3,103 in unsupported expenditures charged to the grant. This resulted in a total of $63,947 in expenditures charged to the food service program that were considered to be unallowable costs. Program Income Program income was added to the project budget as required by the grant. The School Corporation was allowed to use the program income received for purposes of operating and improving its food service program. However, due to the expenditures identified above as unallowable costs, program income was not used in accordance with the requirements of the grant. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than on Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.307 states in part: "(e) Use of program income. . . . (2) Addition. With prior approval of the Federal awarding agency (except for IHEs and nonprofit research institutions, as described in paragraph (e) of this section) program income may be added to the Federal award by the Federal agency and the non- Federal entity. The program income must be used for the purposes and under the conditions of the Federal award. . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation did not properly implement a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principle and Program Income compliance requirements. Effect The failure to properly implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs The expenditures noted above in the Condition and Context resulted in total unallowable costs of $63,947 under the grant. This amount was considered questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Program Income Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 17/18, FY 18/19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Program Income Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding A similar finding also appeared in the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2017-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Program Income compliance requirements. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles The School Corporation developed a system of internal controls in which the Treasurer approved the biweekly payroll claims, which included the salaries and wages charged to the food service program. However, the School Corporation did not properly implement this system. Several administrative staff members who worked on multiple cost objectives were compensated in part from the food service program. The School Corporation did not maintain adequate documentation of personnel expenses to certify the time charged to the grant. As a result, $56,520 in unsupported payroll expenditures were charged to the grant. The School Corporation also paid the required Social Security and Medicare taxes (FICA) related to those payroll expenditures from the food service program, which resulted in $4,324 in unsupported expenditures charged to the grant. In addition, the School Corporation paid retirement expenses for one staff member, which resulted in $3,103 in unsupported expenditures charged to the grant. This resulted in a total of $63,947 in expenditures charged to the food service program that were considered to be unallowable costs. Program Income Program income was added to the project budget as required by the grant. The School Corporation was allowed to use the program income received for purposes of operating and improving its food service program. However, due to the expenditures identified above as unallowable costs, program income was not used in accordance with the requirements of the grant. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than on Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.307 states in part: "(e) Use of program income. . . . (2) Addition. With prior approval of the Federal awarding agency (except for IHEs and nonprofit research institutions, as described in paragraph (e) of this section) program income may be added to the Federal award by the Federal agency and the non- Federal entity. The program income must be used for the purposes and under the conditions of the Federal award. . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation did not properly implement a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principle and Program Income compliance requirements. Effect The failure to properly implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs The expenditures noted above in the Condition and Context resulted in total unallowable costs of $63,947 under the grant. This amount was considered questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2019-002 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tara Bishop Contact Phone Number: 812-843-5576 Views of Responsible Official: We agree with this finding. At the prior audit, we were instructed to complete a Time Study in order to document the amount of time that was being charged to federal funds for administrative duties. The superintendent and auditors discussed a time study strategy, and that process was used during the audit period. The superintendent did not, however, have written documentation of the verbal conversation. The process used was to select random dates several times over the course of the school year and to have the employee complete a time study of that day?s work. These were then compiled and reviewed with the Treasurer to determine the percentage of time that could legitimately be charged to applicable funds. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We are in the process of determining a process that meets the expectations of SBOA. We have asked for guidance from the auditor and are waiting for that written guidance to establish a procedure. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/2020

Prior Finding References

2017-003

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →
2019-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2017-005

FINDING 2019-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 17/18, FY 18/19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2017-005. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Procurements from five vendors during fiscal year 2017-2018 and four vendors during 2018-2019 fell within the small purchase procedures requirements, but there was no evidence that an adequate number of quotations were obtained or documentation as to the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and that the limitation was justified. The total purchases for two vendors during 2017-2018 and two vendors during 2018-2019 exceeded the $50,000 threshold, but the School Corporation did not enter into a written contract with any of these vendors. Procurements from twenty-one vendors during 2017-2018 and eighteen during 2018-2019 fell within the micro-purchase procedures requirements. The School Corporation did not maintain a list of qualified vendors or maintain documentation for the rationale for selecting each vendor. Suspension and Debarment One employee was solely responsible for verification that the vendors with whom the School Corporation entered into a covered transaction were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. There was no evidence of independent review, oversight, or approval process to verify the vendors were checked prior to entering into a covered transaction. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues occurring throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. (a) Procurement by micro purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold (200.67 Micro-purchase). To the extent practicable, the non-Federal entity must distribute micro-purchase equitably among qualified suppliers. Micropurchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable. (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirement identified above. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 17/18, FY 18/19 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2017-005. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Procurements from five vendors during fiscal year 2017-2018 and four vendors during 2018-2019 fell within the small purchase procedures requirements, but there was no evidence that an adequate number of quotations were obtained or documentation as to the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and that the limitation was justified. The total purchases for two vendors during 2017-2018 and two vendors during 2018-2019 exceeded the $50,000 threshold, but the School Corporation did not enter into a written contract with any of these vendors. Procurements from twenty-one vendors during 2017-2018 and eighteen during 2018-2019 fell within the micro-purchase procedures requirements. The School Corporation did not maintain a list of qualified vendors or maintain documentation for the rationale for selecting each vendor. Suspension and Debarment One employee was solely responsible for verification that the vendors with whom the School Corporation entered into a covered transaction were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. There was no evidence of independent review, oversight, or approval process to verify the vendors were checked prior to entering into a covered transaction. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues occurring throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. (a) Procurement by micro purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold (200.67 Micro-purchase). To the extent practicable, the non-Federal entity must distribute micro-purchase equitably among qualified suppliers. Micropurchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable. (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirement identified above. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2019-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tara Bishop Contact Phone Number: 812-843-5576 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with this finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We are in the process of establishing a system to address this finding. We are discussing the development of a vendor checklist that includes the following: vendor name, date of suspension/debarment lookup (attach printout from SAM that has initials of ECA treasurer and another office staff member), date of contract, rationale for selecting the vendor, and the total spent with that vendor to date. We are considering updating this checklist on a monthly basis and having the treasurer and superintendent review and sign it. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/2020

Prior Finding References

2017-005

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2019-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

FINDING 2019-004 Subject: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers CFDA Number: 84.287 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S287C150014, S287C160014, S287C170014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. The School Corporation developed a system of internal controls that expenditures charged to the grant were approved by the Superintendent of Schools and the School Board. However, the School Corporation did not properly implement this system. Transfers of expenditures from other funds were made into the grant funds that were not approved by the Superintendent of Schools or the School Board. The lack of proper implementation of an effective internal control system was a systemic issue, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation did not properly implement a system of internal controls. Effect The failure to properly implement an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-004 Subject: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers CFDA Number: 84.287 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S287C150014, S287C160014, S287C170014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. The School Corporation developed a system of internal controls that expenditures charged to the grant were approved by the Superintendent of Schools and the School Board. However, the School Corporation did not properly implement this system. Transfers of expenditures from other funds were made into the grant funds that were not approved by the Superintendent of Schools or the School Board. The lack of proper implementation of an effective internal control system was a systemic issue, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation did not properly implement a system of internal controls. Effect The failure to properly implement an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2019-004 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tara Bishop Contact Phone Number: 812-843-5576 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with this finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will follow the system of internal controls that is in place and ensure that any transfers between funds are approved by the superintendent or School Board. Anticipated Completion Date: 2/29/2020

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2019-005
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

FINDING 2019-005 Subject: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers CFDA Number: 84.287 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S287C150014, S287C160014, S287C170014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. There were multiple instances in which unallowable costs were charged to Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers (Twenty-First Century). Numerous certified staff and one non-certified staff member who worked on multiple cost objectives were compensated in part from Twenty-First Century funds. The School Corporation did not maintain the required documentation of personnel expenses to certify the time charged to the grant. As a result, $69,062 in unsupported payroll expenditures were charged to the grant. The School Corporation also paid the required Social Security and Medicare taxes (FICA) related to those payroll expenditures from Twenty-First Century funds, which resulted in an additional $5,283 in unsupported expenditures charged to the grant. This resulted in $74,345 in expenditures charged to Twenty-First Century that were considered to be unallowable costs. The School Corporation also made several transfers of expenditures totaling $17,160 into Twenty-First Century funds for which the School Corporation could not provide adequate supporting documentation to certify that the expenditures were related to the grant. As a result, these expenditures were considered to be unallowable costs. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than on Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not properly implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to properly implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs The expenditures noted above in the Condition and Context resulted in total unallowable costs of $91,505 under the grant. This amount was considered questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-005 Subject: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers CFDA Number: 84.287 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S287C150014, S287C160014, S287C170014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. There were multiple instances in which unallowable costs were charged to Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers (Twenty-First Century). Numerous certified staff and one non-certified staff member who worked on multiple cost objectives were compensated in part from Twenty-First Century funds. The School Corporation did not maintain the required documentation of personnel expenses to certify the time charged to the grant. As a result, $69,062 in unsupported payroll expenditures were charged to the grant. The School Corporation also paid the required Social Security and Medicare taxes (FICA) related to those payroll expenditures from Twenty-First Century funds, which resulted in an additional $5,283 in unsupported expenditures charged to the grant. This resulted in $74,345 in expenditures charged to Twenty-First Century that were considered to be unallowable costs. The School Corporation also made several transfers of expenditures totaling $17,160 into Twenty-First Century funds for which the School Corporation could not provide adequate supporting documentation to certify that the expenditures were related to the grant. As a result, these expenditures were considered to be unallowable costs. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than on Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not properly implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to properly implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs The expenditures noted above in the Condition and Context resulted in total unallowable costs of $91,505 under the grant. This amount was considered questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2019-005 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tara Bishop Contact Phone Number: 812-843-5576 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with this finding. There was one staff member for whom a Time and Effort log was not kept; however, that was corrected in the second year of the audit period after the prior auditor found this issue. For the majority of the personnel expenditures in question, the amounts were paid as stipends. The grant budgets, which were approved by the Indiana Department of Education and the Indiana Department of Administration, were written with stipends included. Stipends were selected because the activities being paid for were not finite in nature?they were for coaching a club or robotics team and required whatever amount of time and effort it took to ensure the teams were ready, similar to how athletic coaches are paid. It has not been the practice of the corporation to require time and effort (e.g., sign-in sheet, time sheet, etc.) for a stipend, nor had the corporation ever been directed to do so in prior audits which also included stipends. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We are in the process of establishing a mechanism for documenting time and effort for stipends. We have asked SBOA for guidance and the IDOE for guidance, and each has pointed to the other as the authority. We hope to get written guidelines quickly so that we can correct this moving forward. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/2020

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,736,722 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2019 — management decision was due July 13, 2019.

2017-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Eligibility / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Eligibility, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-005OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-005

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2017-004
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-006OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Cash Management →
2017-005
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-008OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-008

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-006
Program Income
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2018-009

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2018-009

About Program Income →
2017-007
Period of Performance
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Indiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.