Pike-Delta-York Local School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 346577453

UEI: J86TWBE9MJL1

Audited by: Keith Faber, Auditor of State

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Pike-Delta-York Local School District9 audit years5 findings1 repeat
9
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,382,042 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2025 (336 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,858,983 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2024 — management decision was due August 27, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,917,229 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2023 — management decision was due September 5, 2023.

2022-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR ? 200.303 which requires that non- Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 C.F.R. ? 200.514(c) requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-Federal entity?s internal control over Federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance for major programs, and, unless internal control is likely to be ineffective, plan the testing of internal control over major programs to support a low assessed level of control risk for the assertions relevant to the compliance requirements for each major program and perform testing of internal control as planned. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states, in part, ?to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school authority shall ensure that the Claim for Reimbursement accurately reflects the number of lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children, and the school food authority shall, at a minimum: (iii) Base Claims for Reimbursement on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children; (iv) Correctly record, consolidate and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement; and (v) Ensure that Claims for Reimbursement do not request payment for any excess lunches produced, as prohibited in ?210.10(a)(2), or non-Program lunches (i.e., a la carte or adult lunches) or for more than one meal supplement per child per day. 7 CFR ? 210.8(c) states the Claim for Reimbursement shall include data in sufficient detail to justify the reimbursement claimed and to enable the State agency to provide the Report of School Program Operations required under ?210.5(d) of this part. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children. The claim shall be signed by a school food authority official. Two out of thirty (6.7%) site claim forms submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were inaccurate, since the District claimed more meals served than what was actually distributed. These errors occurred due to a weakness in internal controls, which failed to ensure site claim forms for reimbursable meals served at each building and submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were entered correctly. Failure to properly report the number of eligible meals resulted in the District receiving unsubstantiated reimbursements totaling $837. The District should implement policies and procedures to help ensure that monthly site claim forms for all District buildings are reviewed and submitted to reflect actual counts for reimbursable meals served.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR ? 200.303 which requires that non- Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 C.F.R. ? 200.514(c) requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-Federal entity?s internal control over Federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance for major programs, and, unless internal control is likely to be ineffective, plan the testing of internal control over major programs to support a low assessed level of control risk for the assertions relevant to the compliance requirements for each major program and perform testing of internal control as planned. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states, in part, ?to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school authority shall ensure that the Claim for Reimbursement accurately reflects the number of lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children, and the school food authority shall, at a minimum: (iii) Base Claims for Reimbursement on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children; (iv) Correctly record, consolidate and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement; and (v) Ensure that Claims for Reimbursement do not request payment for any excess lunches produced, as prohibited in ?210.10(a)(2), or non-Program lunches (i.e., a la carte or adult lunches) or for more than one meal supplement per child per day. 7 CFR ? 210.8(c) states the Claim for Reimbursement shall include data in sufficient detail to justify the reimbursement claimed and to enable the State agency to provide the Report of School Program Operations required under ?210.5(d) of this part. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements served to eligible children. The claim shall be signed by a school food authority official. Two out of thirty (6.7%) site claim forms submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were inaccurate, since the District claimed more meals served than what was actually distributed. These errors occurred due to a weakness in internal controls, which failed to ensure site claim forms for reimbursable meals served at each building and submitted by the District to the Ohio Department of Education were entered correctly. Failure to properly report the number of eligible meals resulted in the District receiving unsubstantiated reimbursements totaling $837. The District should implement policies and procedures to help ensure that monthly site claim forms for all District buildings are reviewed and submitted to reflect actual counts for reimbursable meals served.

Corrective Action Plan

Management is aware and understands the importance of compliance with the federal requirements and will ensure the meal counts will be properly reported in the future.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,402,516 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2022 — management decision was due September 14, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Questioned Cost, Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance, as supplemented by this part. This part adopts in the OMB guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR ? 200.430(a) provides that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity?s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. Furthermore, Ohio Department of Education Grants Management Guidance 2014-002, revised on June 15, 2016 and August 29, 2019, further clarifies these requirements. The type of documentation required is based on the funding source and/or cost objective: ? Semi-annual certifications are allowed when an employee's compensation is funded by only one Federal grant. An employee funded by a federal grant and the General fund would fall under this category. ? Time and effort documentation is used when an employee's compensation is funded by more than one federal grant. ? The substitute system of collecting time and effort is used when an employee?s compensation is funded by more than one grant. Due to a deficiency in internal policies and procedures over compliance, District employees, who are paid by contract from the Child Nutrition Cluster funds, did not obtain semi-annual certifications for payroll and benefit expenditures which resulted in Child Nutrition Cluster actual and projected expenditures of $17,560 and $205,859, respectively, not being supported with semi-annual certifications and will be considered a questioned cost. Based on the above guidance, these employees should have completed semi-annual certifications as their compensation was funded by a single Federal grant. The District should implement control procedures to verify that all District employees who perform work for federal cost objectives complete semi-annual certifications for single source funded personnel and time and effort documentation for payroll charges for split funded personnel. The documentation should be signed by each individual employee or a supervisor who has firsthand knowledge of the information contained in the documentation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Questioned Cost, Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance, as supplemented by this part. This part adopts in the OMB guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR ? 200.430(a) provides that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity?s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. Furthermore, Ohio Department of Education Grants Management Guidance 2014-002, revised on June 15, 2016 and August 29, 2019, further clarifies these requirements. The type of documentation required is based on the funding source and/or cost objective: ? Semi-annual certifications are allowed when an employee's compensation is funded by only one Federal grant. An employee funded by a federal grant and the General fund would fall under this category. ? Time and effort documentation is used when an employee's compensation is funded by more than one federal grant. ? The substitute system of collecting time and effort is used when an employee?s compensation is funded by more than one grant. Due to a deficiency in internal policies and procedures over compliance, District employees, who are paid by contract from the Child Nutrition Cluster funds, did not obtain semi-annual certifications for payroll and benefit expenditures which resulted in Child Nutrition Cluster actual and projected expenditures of $17,560 and $205,859, respectively, not being supported with semi-annual certifications and will be considered a questioned cost. Based on the above guidance, these employees should have completed semi-annual certifications as their compensation was funded by a single Federal grant. The District should implement control procedures to verify that all District employees who perform work for federal cost objectives complete semi-annual certifications for single source funded personnel and time and effort documentation for payroll charges for split funded personnel. The documentation should be signed by each individual employee or a supervisor who has firsthand knowledge of the information contained in the documentation.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will review time and effort documentation requirements with applicable employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$961,832 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2021 — management decision was due August 10, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,006,031 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$971,097 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$870,549 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2018 — management decision was due September 26, 2018.

2017-003
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2016-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Other →
2017-004
Cash Management / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management, Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$794,012 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2017 — management decision was due September 1, 2017.

2016-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.