← Back to home

Northeastern Local School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 346407664

UEI: TLHSGQYCFU23

Audited by: Perry & Associates CPAs

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Northeastern Local School District6 audit years3 findings
6
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,273,740 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 29, 2026 (36 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Management acknowledged its responsibility to establish and maintain effective internal controls to reasonably assure compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of federal awards and controls relating to preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule), as required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.303(a)), in the audit engagement letter. Furthermore, Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Subpart F § 200.510(b)) requires the auditee prepare the Schedule for the period covered by the District’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. Due to insufficient controls over the monitoring of grant activity, the District did not retain appropriate support on the dates of the determination to charge prior year costs to the American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) grant in the amount of $678,544. The grant award was for $1,019,060, which had a grant period spanning calendar years 2020 through 2024. Lack of maintaining such documentation could result in expenditures determined to be unallowable under grant guidelines and funds required to be returned. Ineffective internal controls related to federal grants could lead to noncompliance with program requirements. Additionally, the determination of unallowable costs could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency or agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. District management should implement a system to review the Schedule for errors and omissions as well as a method to monitor the related internal controls over compliance with federal grant requirements. This will help ensure the Schedule is complete and accurate, major federal programs are accurately identified for audit, and internal controls over compliance requirements are implemented and operating effectively.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Management acknowledged its responsibility to establish and maintain effective internal controls to reasonably assure compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of federal awards and controls relating to preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule), as required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.303(a)), in the audit engagement letter. Furthermore, Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Subpart F § 200.510(b)) requires the auditee prepare the Schedule for the period covered by the District’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. Due to insufficient controls over the monitoring of grant activity, the District did not retain appropriate support on the dates of the determination to charge prior year costs to the American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) grant in the amount of $678,544. The grant award was for $1,019,060, which had a grant period spanning calendar years 2020 through 2024. Lack of maintaining such documentation could result in expenditures determined to be unallowable under grant guidelines and funds required to be returned. Ineffective internal controls related to federal grants could lead to noncompliance with program requirements. Additionally, the determination of unallowable costs could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency or agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. District management should implement a system to review the Schedule for errors and omissions as well as a method to monitor the related internal controls over compliance with federal grant requirements. This will help ensure the Schedule is complete and accurate, major federal programs are accurately identified for audit, and internal controls over compliance requirements are implemented and operating effectively.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will implement procedure to ensure that grant activity is charged during the proper period and sufficient documentation is maintained.

About Reporting →
2025-004
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending $92,404 to Peterson Construction Company for a noncompliant contract/project of American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) AL #84.425U which did not meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. The District entered into an agreement subject to the wage rate requirements with a contractor that did not contain provisions to ensure the contractor complied with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5) and the District did not obtain copies of the weekly certified payroll reports from the contractors to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis for each week in which any work was performed. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending $92,404 to Peterson Construction Company for a noncompliant contract/project of American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) AL #84.425U which did not meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. The District entered into an agreement subject to the wage rate requirements with a contractor that did not contain provisions to ensure the contractor complied with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5) and the District did not obtain copies of the weekly certified payroll reports from the contractors to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis for each week in which any work was performed. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will implement procedures to ensure that Davis-Bacon language is included for future projects with contractors or subcontractors to work on projects in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2025-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,130,814 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2026 — management decision was due August 24, 2026.

2025-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Management acknowledged its responsibility to establish and maintain effective internal controls to reasonably assure compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of federal awards and controls relating to preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule), as required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.303(a)), in the audit engagement letter. Furthermore, Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Subpart F § 200.510(b)) requires the auditee prepare the Schedule for the period covered by the District’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. Due to insufficient controls over the monitoring of grant activity, the District did not retain appropriate support on the dates of the determination to charge prior year costs to the American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) grant in the amount of $678,544. The grant award was for $1,019,060, which had a grant period spanning calendar years 2020 through 2024. Lack of maintaining such documentation could result in expenditures determined to be unallowable under grant guidelines and funds required to be returned. Ineffective internal controls related to federal grants could lead to noncompliance with program requirements. Additionally, the determination of unallowable costs could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency or agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. District management should implement a system to review the Schedule for errors and omissions as well as a method to monitor the related internal controls over compliance with federal grant requirements. This will help ensure the Schedule is complete and accurate, major federal programs are accurately identified for audit, and internal controls over compliance requirements are implemented and operating effectively.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Management acknowledged its responsibility to establish and maintain effective internal controls to reasonably assure compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of federal awards and controls relating to preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule), as required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.303(a)), in the audit engagement letter. Furthermore, Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Subpart F § 200.510(b)) requires the auditee prepare the Schedule for the period covered by the District’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. Due to insufficient controls over the monitoring of grant activity, the District did not retain appropriate support on the dates of the determination to charge prior year costs to the American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) grant in the amount of $678,544. The grant award was for $1,019,060, which had a grant period spanning calendar years 2020 through 2024. Lack of maintaining such documentation could result in expenditures determined to be unallowable under grant guidelines and funds required to be returned. Ineffective internal controls related to federal grants could lead to noncompliance with program requirements. Additionally, the determination of unallowable costs could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency or agencies in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. District management should implement a system to review the Schedule for errors and omissions as well as a method to monitor the related internal controls over compliance with federal grant requirements. This will help ensure the Schedule is complete and accurate, major federal programs are accurately identified for audit, and internal controls over compliance requirements are implemented and operating effectively.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will implement procedure to ensure that grant activity is charged during the proper period and sufficient documentation is maintained.

About Reporting →
2025-004
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending $92,404 to Peterson Construction Company for a noncompliant contract/project of American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) AL #84.425U which did not meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. The District entered into an agreement subject to the wage rate requirements with a contractor that did not contain provisions to ensure the contractor complied with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5) and the District did not obtain copies of the weekly certified payroll reports from the contractors to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis for each week in which any work was performed. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending $92,404 to Peterson Construction Company for a noncompliant contract/project of American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) AL #84.425U which did not meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. The District entered into an agreement subject to the wage rate requirements with a contractor that did not contain provisions to ensure the contractor complied with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5) and the District did not obtain copies of the weekly certified payroll reports from the contractors to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis for each week in which any work was performed. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will implement procedures to ensure that Davis-Bacon language is included for future projects with contractors or subcontractors to work on projects in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$800,649 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2025 — management decision was due September 6, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,321,913 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2024 — management decision was due August 27, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,137,027 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 18, 2023 — management decision was due October 18, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$997,785 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 18, 2022 — management decision was due October 18, 2022.

2021-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2 CFR ? 417.10 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance, as supplemented by this part. This part adopts the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180. Per 2 CFR ? 417.20, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 apply to participants or principals in ?covered transactions.? 2 CFR 180.305 states that Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR ? 180.135. ?Covered transactions? include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR ? 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR ? 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking SAM exclusions (www.sam.gov); collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that entity. District Policy #6325, Procurement ? Federal Grants/Funds, states that for contracts over $25,000, the District shall confirm that the vendor is not debarred or suspended by either checking the Federal government's System for Award Management, which maintains a list of such debarred or suspended vendors at www.sam.gov; collecting a certification from the vendor; or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The District did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the District had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. During testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted an instance in which the program had a payment to a vendor of more than $25,000 and there was no evidence the District checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for Arps Dairy, one of two covered transactions in the Child Nutrition Cluster during fiscal year 2021. Failing to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors receiving federal funds that are suspended or debarred. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the District should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2 CFR ? 417.10 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance, as supplemented by this part. This part adopts the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180. Per 2 CFR ? 417.20, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 apply to participants or principals in ?covered transactions.? 2 CFR 180.305 states that Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR ? 180.135. ?Covered transactions? include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR ? 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR ? 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking SAM exclusions (www.sam.gov); collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that entity. District Policy #6325, Procurement ? Federal Grants/Funds, states that for contracts over $25,000, the District shall confirm that the vendor is not debarred or suspended by either checking the Federal government's System for Award Management, which maintains a list of such debarred or suspended vendors at www.sam.gov; collecting a certification from the vendor; or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The District did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the District had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. During testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted an instance in which the program had a payment to a vendor of more than $25,000 and there was no evidence the District checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for Arps Dairy, one of two covered transactions in the Child Nutrition Cluster during fiscal year 2021. Failing to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors receiving federal funds that are suspended or debarred. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the District should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will implement procedures to ensure that qualified vendors who receive over $25,000 of federal funds have not been suspended or debarred.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.