EIN: 346401049
UEI: X5JFLNJU68N6
Audited by: KEITH FABER, AUDITOR OF STATE
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 12, 2026 (10 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending $124,621 to Lakeside Interior Contractors, Inc. for a noncompliant project of American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER III) AL #84.425U which did not meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. The District had work completed subject to the wage rate requirements with a contractor that did not contain a provision to ensure the contractor complied with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5).
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending $124,621 to Lakeside Interior Contractors, Inc. for a noncompliant project of American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER III) AL #84.425U which did not meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. The District had work completed subject to the wage rate requirements with a contractor that did not contain a provision to ensure the contractor complied with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5).
The District will implement procedures to ensure that Davis-Bacon language is included for future projects with contractors or subcontractors to work on projects in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds.
FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2025 — management decision was due August 18, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2024 — management decision was due July 30, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2023 — management decision was due August 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2022 — management decision was due September 7, 2022.
2 CFR ? 417.10 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance, as supplemented by this part. This part adopts the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180. Per 2 CFR ? 417.20, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 apply to participants or principals in ?covered transactions.? 2 CFR 180.305 states that Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR ? 180.135. ?Covered transactions? include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR ? 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR ? 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking SAM exclusions (www.sam.gov) collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that entity. District Policy #6325, Procurement ? Federal Grants/Funds, states that for contracts over $25,000, the District shall confirm that the vendor is not debarred or suspended by either checking the Federal government's System for Award Management, which maintains a list of such debarred or suspended vendors at www.sam.gov; collecting a certification from the vendor; or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the School District had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. During testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted an instance in which the program had a payment to a vendor of more than $25,000 and there was no evidence the School District checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for Arps Dairy, one of three covered transactions in the Child Nutrition Cluster during Fiscal Year 2021. Failing to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors receiving federal funds that are suspended or debarred. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the School District should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2 CFR ? 417.10 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance, as supplemented by this part. This part adopts the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180. Per 2 CFR ? 417.20, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 apply to participants or principals in ?covered transactions.? 2 CFR 180.305 states that Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR ? 180.135. ?Covered transactions? include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR ? 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR ? 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking SAM exclusions (www.sam.gov) collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that entity. District Policy #6325, Procurement ? Federal Grants/Funds, states that for contracts over $25,000, the District shall confirm that the vendor is not debarred or suspended by either checking the Federal government's System for Award Management, which maintains a list of such debarred or suspended vendors at www.sam.gov; collecting a certification from the vendor; or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the School District had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. During testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted an instance in which the program had a payment to a vendor of more than $25,000 and there was no evidence the School District checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for Arps Dairy, one of three covered transactions in the Child Nutrition Cluster during Fiscal Year 2021. Failing to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors receiving federal funds that are suspended or debarred. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the School District should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
The Treasurer will implement procedures to ensure that qualified vendors who receive over $25,000 of federal funds have not been suspended or debarred.
FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2021 — management decision was due August 16, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2020 — management decision was due September 15, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2017 — management decision was due September 30, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.