← Back to home

Wickliffe City School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 346003071

UEI: L6DLYYULP8S8

Audited by: Ohio Auditor of State Keith Faber

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Wickliffe City School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,262,392 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 18, 2026 (105 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,617,411 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2026 — management decision was due July 8, 2026.

2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Office of Management Budget guidance in 2 CFR § 200 for the Department of Education. 2 CFR § 200 Subpart E which states, in part, costs must be adequately documented in order to be considered allowable. 2 CFR § 200.430(g)(1)(i) states, in part, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce’s Grants Manual states, in part, semi-annual certifications are allowed when an employee’s compensation is funded by only one federal grant and works solely on a single cost objective. An employee funded by a federal grant and the general fund would fall under this category. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce’s Grants Management Guidance 2014-002 states, in part, employees who meet [the criteria to use semi-annual certifications] are not required to maintain time-and-effort records if their job description clearly shows the employee is assigned 100% to the program or single cost objective. Each employee must certify in writing, at least semi-annually, that he/she worked solely on the program or single cost objective for the period covered by the certification. The certification is signed by the employee or by the supervisor having first-hand knowledge. Charges to the grant must be supported by these semi-annual certifications. The semi-annual certification is executed after the work has been completed, and not before. Due to insufficient controls over records management, the District did not maintain semi-annual certifications, or other time and effort documentation, for employees paid from the Special Education Cluster. As a result, $170,293 of payroll and benefits charged to the Special Education Cluster were not supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed and are questioned costs under 2 CFR § 200.516. Lack of controls over records management could lead to the District not being able to support charges against federal programs and potentially losing funding. The District should ensure semi-annual certifications are accurately and timely completed and subsequently retained to support payroll and benefits charged to the program. This documentation should be used to determine the allocation of salary among the various programs, grants, activities, etc. We further recommend the District’s management review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance to determine the documentation needed and other requirements related to the allowability of costs to Federal awards to prevent such noncompliance in the future.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Office of Management Budget guidance in 2 CFR § 200 for the Department of Education. 2 CFR § 200 Subpart E which states, in part, costs must be adequately documented in order to be considered allowable. 2 CFR § 200.430(g)(1)(i) states, in part, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce’s Grants Manual states, in part, semi-annual certifications are allowed when an employee’s compensation is funded by only one federal grant and works solely on a single cost objective. An employee funded by a federal grant and the general fund would fall under this category. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce’s Grants Management Guidance 2014-002 states, in part, employees who meet [the criteria to use semi-annual certifications] are not required to maintain time-and-effort records if their job description clearly shows the employee is assigned 100% to the program or single cost objective. Each employee must certify in writing, at least semi-annually, that he/she worked solely on the program or single cost objective for the period covered by the certification. The certification is signed by the employee or by the supervisor having first-hand knowledge. Charges to the grant must be supported by these semi-annual certifications. The semi-annual certification is executed after the work has been completed, and not before. Due to insufficient controls over records management, the District did not maintain semi-annual certifications, or other time and effort documentation, for employees paid from the Special Education Cluster. As a result, $170,293 of payroll and benefits charged to the Special Education Cluster were not supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed and are questioned costs under 2 CFR § 200.516. Lack of controls over records management could lead to the District not being able to support charges against federal programs and potentially losing funding. The District should ensure semi-annual certifications are accurately and timely completed and subsequently retained to support payroll and benefits charged to the program. This documentation should be used to determine the allocation of salary among the various programs, grants, activities, etc. We further recommend the District’s management review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance to determine the documentation needed and other requirements related to the allowability of costs to Federal awards to prevent such noncompliance in the future.

Corrective Action Plan

The District Director of Student Services will monitor and make sure that all personnel who serve under federal programs have their time properly documented using semi-annual certification forms or other appropriate time and effort methods.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISGOING CONCERNMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,727,425 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2025 — management decision was due July 24, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,638,568 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2023 — management decision was due September 8, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,338,264 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2022 — management decision was due November 5, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,062,370 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2021 — management decision was due September 15, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,233,916 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2020 — management decision was due September 15, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,152,736 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2019 — management decision was due July 22, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,165,215 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2018 — management decision was due August 12, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,552,307 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2017 — management decision was due September 8, 2017.

2016-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.