EIN: 346002767
UEI: U6G4R3NXS4T7
Audited by: Keith Faber, Auditor of State of Ohio
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 1, 2026 (70 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2025 — management decision was due March 23, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2024 — management decision was due March 24, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on August 6, 2024 — management decision was due February 6, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2023 — management decision was due March 26, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2023 — management decision was due December 26, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 15, 2022 — management decision was due December 15, 2022.
2 CFR section 200.332(a) states all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award During testing over subrecipient monitoring, we noted 2 out of 2 subawards (100%) did not include all of the required information. Additionally, during testing we noted 1 out of 2 subrecipients (50%) did not have a risk assessment completed. Failure to include the required information in subawards and failure to complete risk assessments could result in the County not effectively monitoring their subrecipients. The County should include the required information in their subawards and implement controls to ensure risk assessments are completed in accordance with County policies.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2 CFR section 200.332(a) states all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award During testing over subrecipient monitoring, we noted 2 out of 2 subawards (100%) did not include all of the required information. Additionally, during testing we noted 1 out of 2 subrecipients (50%) did not have a risk assessment completed. Failure to include the required information in subawards and failure to complete risk assessments could result in the County not effectively monitoring their subrecipients. The County should include the required information in their subawards and implement controls to ensure risk assessments are completed in accordance with County policies.
Subrecipient contracts have been updated to include the correct language, and risk assessments have been performed on all applicable subrecipients
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2022 — management decision was due March 28, 2023.
2 CFR section 200.332(a) states all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award During testing over subrecipient monitoring, we noted 2 out of 2 subawards (100%) did not include all of the required information. Additionally, during testing we noted 1 out of 2 subrecipients (50%) did not have a risk assessment completed. Failure to include the required information in subawards and failure to complete risk assessments could result in the County not effectively monitoring their subrecipients. The County should include the required information in their subawards and implement controls to ensure risk assessments are completed in accordance with County policies.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2 CFR section 200.332(a) states all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award During testing over subrecipient monitoring, we noted 2 out of 2 subawards (100%) did not include all of the required information. Additionally, during testing we noted 1 out of 2 subrecipients (50%) did not have a risk assessment completed. Failure to include the required information in subawards and failure to complete risk assessments could result in the County not effectively monitoring their subrecipients. The County should include the required information in their subawards and implement controls to ensure risk assessments are completed in accordance with County policies.
Subrecipient contracts have been updated to include the correct language, and risk assessments have been performed on all applicable subrecipients
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2021 — management decision was due December 30, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2021 — management decision was due April 17, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2020 — management decision was due March 27, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2020 — management decision was due January 15, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2019 — management decision was due December 30, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2019 — management decision was due February 27, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on June 14, 2018 — management decision was due December 14, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2018 — management decision was due March 13, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2017 — management decision was due December 27, 2017.
FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2017 — management decision was due February 27, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
