← Back to home

Shelby City School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 346002632

UEI: KLVXU6366JX5

Audited by: Julian and Grube, Inc.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Shelby City School District10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,294,836 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 7, 2026 (59 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$3,082,370 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 9, 2025 — management decision was due December 9, 2025.

2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education (DOE) for Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 which states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending AL# 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund federal grant funds on the following projects which did not meet the requirements of the Davis Bacon Act: • $34,500 for an asphalt parking lot at the health clinic. The District did not enter into a written agreement with the contractor which contained a provision to ensure the contractor complied with Federal wage rate requirements. Further, the District did not obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis. • $2,975 for a new sidewalk at the health clinic. The District did not enter into a written agreement with the contractor which contained a provision to ensure the contractor complied with Federal wage rate requirements. Further, the District did not obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis. The above-listed noncompliance also resulted in a qualified opinion over the AL# 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund program. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors or subcontractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements. Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education (DOE) for Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 which states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending AL# 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund federal grant funds on the following projects which did not meet the requirements of the Davis Bacon Act: • $34,500 for an asphalt parking lot at the health clinic. The District did not enter into a written agreement with the contractor which contained a provision to ensure the contractor complied with Federal wage rate requirements. Further, the District did not obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis. • $2,975 for a new sidewalk at the health clinic. The District did not enter into a written agreement with the contractor which contained a provision to ensure the contractor complied with Federal wage rate requirements. Further, the District did not obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis. The above-listed noncompliance also resulted in a qualified opinion over the AL# 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund program. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors or subcontractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements. Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Corrective Action Plan

The district will ensure that any contracts that will be paid with Federal Funds will follow the provisions outlined in the grant documentation.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,127,695 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 9, 2024 — management decision was due October 9, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,416,775 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2023 — management decision was due September 12, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,739,848 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,454,963 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2021 — management decision was due November 5, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,576,636 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2020 — management decision was due August 12, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,504,163 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2019 — management decision was due September 6, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,608,450 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2018 — management decision was due September 1, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$1,664,893 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2017 — management decision was due September 9, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.