EIN: 341970725
UEI: NKJLBKADCZA5
Audited by: GBQ Partners, LLC
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 23, 2025 (436 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Project did not request tenant assistance payments for the month of April. Criteria: The Regulatory Agreement requires the Project to ensure controls exist to request the appropriate funds for each tenant on a monthly basis. Cause of Condition: The Project’s controls over monthly housing assistance payments were not working properly due to lack of management oversight due to turnover during the year. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved Regulatory Agreement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen management oversight. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) - Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period - Year ended June 30, 2024 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Material Weakness Over Compliance: Program Administration Statement of Condition: The Project did not request tenant assistance payments for the month of April. Criteria: The Regulatory Agreement requires the Project to ensure controls exist to request the appropriate funds for each tenant on a monthly basis. Cause of Condition: The Project’s controls over monthly housing assistance payments were not working properly due to lack of management oversight due to turnover during the year. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved Regulatory Agreement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen management oversight. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.
Wood County Village II, Inc. HUD Project No. 042-HD102 Audit Firm: GBQ Partners LLC Audit Period: 07/1/23-06/30/24 CAP Prepared by: Dustin Watkins, CEO A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations. 1. Finding 2024-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – CFDA 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2024 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: The Project did not request tenant assistance payments for the month of April. Criteria: The Regulatory Agreement requires the Project to ensure controls exist to request the appropriate funds for each tenant on a monthly basis. Cause: The Project’s controls over monthly housing assistance payments were not working properly due to lack of management oversight due to turnover during the year. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved Regulatory Agreement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen management oversight. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirements of the HUD Regulatory Agreement and is working with new staff to ensure they receive the proper training on HUD requirements. 2. In August 2024, the April 2024 HAP requests were submitted for payment.
Security deposits assets collected from eligible families and the corresponding liability recorded, did not equal. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place bearing-account security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause of Condition: The Project experienced a fire in June 2024 that caused a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation and transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD Handbook. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) - Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period - Year ended June 30, 2024 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Significant Deficiency Over Compliance: Special Tests and Provisions Statement of Condition: Security deposits assets collected from eligible families and the corresponding liability recorded, did not equal. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place bearing-account security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause of Condition: The Project experienced a fire in June 2024 that caused a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation and transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD Handbook. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.
Wood County Village II, Inc. HUD Project No. 042-HD102 Audit Firm: GBQ Partners LLC Audit Period: 07/1/23-06/30/24 CAP Prepared by: Dustin Watkins, CEO A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations. 2. Finding 2024-002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – CFDA 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2024 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: Security deposits assets collected from eligible families and the corresponding liability recorded, did not equal. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause: The Project experienced a fire in June 2024 that caused a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation and transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This Project was not in compliance with the HUD Handbook. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to maintain security deposit records. 2. Due to the fire and displacement of tenants, the security deposit account has not been fully reconciled subsequent to year.
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2024 — management decision was due July 18, 2024.
Security deposit listing was not updated with the current tenants’ information, including tenants who had moved out, moved in, or changes in the security deposit requirements. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires the owner to utilize and refer to its security deposit records. Cause of Condition: The Project’s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in the improper maintenance of security deposit records of the Project, resulting in possible unidentified noncompliance with HUD regulatory provisions. Identification of Repeat Finding: None Recommendation: We recommend that the Project strengthen its internal control review function over security deposits to ensure the security deposit listing is properly maintained. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to maintain security deposit records. In August 2023, the management company reconciled the account and has put in place measures to ensure that tenant security deposit account is maintained moving forward.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2023 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Significant Deficiency Over Compliance: Special Tests and Provisions Statement of Condition: Security deposit listing was not updated with the current tenants’ information, including tenants who had moved out, moved in, or changes in the security deposit requirements. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires the owner to utilize and refer to its security deposit records. Cause of Condition: The Project’s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in the improper maintenance of security deposit records of the Project, resulting in possible unidentified noncompliance with HUD regulatory provisions. Identification of Repeat Finding: None Recommendation: We recommend that the Project strengthen its internal control review function over security deposits to ensure the security deposit listing is properly maintained. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to maintain security deposit records. In August 2023, the management company reconciled the account and has put in place measures to ensure that tenant security deposit account is maintained moving forward.
Wood County Village II, Inc. HUD Project No. 042-HD102 Audit Firm: GBQ Partners LLC Audit Period: 07/1/22-06/30/23 CAP Prepared by: Donna Jablonski, CEO A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations. 1. Finding 2023-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – CFDA 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2023 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: Security deposit listing was not updated with the current tenants’ information, including tenants who had moved out, moved in, or changes in the security deposit requirements. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires the owner to utilize and refer to its security deposit records. Cause: The Project’s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in the improper maintenance of security deposit records of the Project, resulting In possible unidentified noncompliance with HUD regulatory provisions. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor strengthen its internal control review function over security deposits to ensure the security deposit listing is properly maintained. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to maintain security deposit records. 2. In August 2023, the management company reconciled the account and has put in place measures to ensure that tenant security deposit account is maintained moving forward.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2023 — management decision was due July 8, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2021 — management decision was due March 30, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2021 — management decision was due July 5, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2019 — management decision was due April 30, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on November 8, 2018 — management decision was due May 8, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2018 — management decision was due September 28, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2017 — management decision was due July 29, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.